Impervious surface impact on water quality in the process of rapid urbanization in Shenzhen, China

Urbanization has accelerated rapidly over the last century, which has caused surfaces in natural ecosystems to shift to impervious surfaces. As a result, urban watershed ecosystems show altered physical, chemical and ecological process. As an important part of watershed management, urbanization has become one of the key issues involved in the deterioration of water quality. Impervious surface area (ISA) has been recognized as a key indicator of the effects of non-point runoff and water quality within a particular watershed. Numerous case studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between urbanization and water quality in different study areas. However, there is still a lack of understanding regarding quantitative analysis of the threshold between urbanization and water quality indicators. This study was conducted to improve the understanding of how to quantify a threshold between urbanization and water quality, taking the rapid urbanization zone of Shenzhen, China as a case study. To accomplish this, ISA was extracted from the Landsat™ image using a linear spectral mixture method to quantify the urbanization. The relationship between water quality indicators and ISA was then analyzed by nonlinear regression, and the threshold between ISA and the chemical indicators of water quality was investigated using the statistical segment approach method. The results indicate that the water quality indicators and ISA are significantly correlated, and that, with the exception of Zn, Pb, and CN, the water quality indicators had R2 values greater than 0.45. Furthermore, with the exception of Zn, F−, Pb and oils, water quality indicators were found to have an ISA threshold of 36.9–52.9 %, indicating that it is important to control the ISA below 36.9 % in urbanization watersheds to enable effective urban watershed management.

[1]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems , 2002, Aquatic Sciences.

[2]  Scott Goetz,et al.  Urbanization and the Loss of Resource Lands in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed , 2005, Environmental management.

[3]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .

[4]  Tenley M. Conway,et al.  Impervious surface as an indicator of pH and specific conductance in the urbanizing coastal zone of New Jersey, USA. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  D. Lu,et al.  Assessing the effects of land use and land cover patterns on thermal conditions using landscape metrics in city of Indianapolis, United States , 2007, Urban Ecosystems.

[6]  D. Roberts,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping of urban land cover using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis: Manaus, Brazil , 2007 .

[7]  V. Muggeo Estimating regression models with unknown break‐points , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Changshan Wu,et al.  Normalized spectral mixture analysis for monitoring urban composition using ETM+ imagery , 2004 .

[9]  A. Huryn,et al.  Impervious Surface Area as a Predictor of the Effects of Urbanization on Stream Insect Communities in Maine, U.S.A. , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[10]  Qihao Weng,et al.  A sub-pixel analysis of urbanization effect on land surface temperature and its interplay with impervious surface and vegetation coverage in Indianapolis, United States , 2008, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[11]  Luna B. Leopold,et al.  Hydrology for urban land plan-ning-a guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use , 1968 .

[12]  Expanding the bridging capability of landscape ecology , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis , 2003 .

[14]  H. Johnson,et al.  Chapter D. Effects of Urbanization on Stream Ecosystems in the Willamette River Basin and Surrounding Area, Oregon and Washington , 2008 .

[15]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LINKING WATERSHED LAND COVER TO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN STREAMS , 2005 .

[16]  T. Schueler The importance of imperviousness , 1995 .

[17]  D. Arscott,et al.  Landscape template of New York City's drinking-water-supply watersheds , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[18]  R. Klein URBANIZATION AND STREAM QUALITY IMPAIRMENT , 1979 .

[19]  Shakeel Ahmed,et al.  GIS-based impact assessment of land-use changes on groundwater quality: study from a rapidly urbanizing region of South India , 2011 .

[20]  M. Alberti,et al.  The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems: An empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins , 2007 .

[21]  Daniel N. Weber,et al.  Relationships Between Impervious Surfaces within a Watershed and Measures of Reproduction in Fathead Minnows (Pimephales Promelas) , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[22]  Elizabeth Brabec,et al.  Impervious Surfaces and Water Quality: A Review of Current Literature and Its Implications for Watershed Planning , 2002 .

[23]  S. Goetz,et al.  Watersheds at Risk to Increased Impervious Surface Cover in the Conterminous United States , 2009 .

[24]  C. Jackson,et al.  URBANIZATION OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS: DEGRADATION THRESHOLDS, STORMWATER DETECTION, AND THE LIMITS OF MITIGATION 1 , 1997 .

[25]  T. Wade,et al.  Linking Land Cover and Water Quality in New York City’S Water Supply Watersheds , 2005, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[26]  George Xian,et al.  An analysis of urban development and its environmental impact on the Tampa Bay watershed. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  M. Ridd Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities , 1995 .