A brush stimulator for functional brain imaging

OBJECTIVE To describe a novel non-magnetic hand-held device to stimulate various parts of the skin and to evaluate its performance in magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings. METHODS The hand-held part of the device consists of an optic fiber bundle that forms a small brush. Half of the fibers emit modulated red light and the other half detect the reflected light from the skin so that the brush-to-skin contact is detected by means of reflectance. RESULTS Light tapping of the back of the hand at the innervation area of the radial nerve elicited clear responses in all 10 subjects studied, with the main deflections peaking 40-70 ms after the stimulus. The earliest responses, obtained with a higher number of averaged trials, peaked 27-28 ms after the tap to the left hand dorsum. Source analysis of the MEG signals indicated neuronal sources at the primary somatosensory (SI) cortex, with a clear somatotopical order for face vs. hand. CONCLUSIONS The device seems feasible for both MEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments to address functional anatomy of the human somatosensory system with a real-life like stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE Non-magnetic and artefact-free tactile stimulator with a selective stimulus offers new possibilities for experimental designs to study the human mechanoreceptor system.

[1]  N Forss,et al.  Functional overlap of finger representations in human SI and SII cortices. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Nikolaus M. Szeverenyi,et al.  Fingertip Representation in the Human Somatosensory Cortex: An fMRI Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[3]  R. Hari,et al.  Magnetoencephalography in the study of human somatosensory cortical processing. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[5]  R Salmelin,et al.  Comparison of somatosensory evoked fields to airpuff and electric stimuli. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  Bernd Lütkenhöner,et al.  Efficient neuromagnetic determination of landmarks in the somatosensory cortex , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Human cortical representation of virtual auditory space: differences between sound azimuth and elevation , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Somatosensory evoked fields to large-area vibrotactile stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Matti Kajola,et al.  Neuromagnetic Somatosensory Responses to Natural Moving Tactile Stimulation , 2003, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[10]  I. Hashimoto,et al.  Input-output relation of the somatosensory system for mechanical air-puff stimulation of the index finger in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  R. Hari,et al.  Functional Organization of the Human First and Second Somatosensory Cortices: a Neuromagnetic Study , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[12]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Common cortical network for first and second pain , 2005, NeuroImage.