The Effects of Thin and Heavy Media Images on Overweight and Underweight Consumers: Social Comparison Processes and Behavioral Implications

This study examines how advertisements containing thin or heavy models influence the self-esteem of overweight, normal, and underweight consumers. Previous research has mainly examined the influences of variations of the comparison standard on self-evaluative outcomes, whereas we examine how the relative position of the self on the comparison dimension may moderate these effects. Three studies manipulated the size (thin vs. heavy) and extremity of the size (moderate vs. extreme) of advertising models and exposed these images to individuals differing in Body Mass Index (BMI) levels. Our findings indicate that social comparison processes and subsequent self-evaluative and behavioral outcomes are different for individuals differing in their BMI. (c) 2009 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..

[1]  J. Förster Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: how global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Camille S. Johnson,et al.  When nothing compares to me : How defensive motivations and similarity shape social comparison effects , 2007 .

[3]  D T Gilbert,et al.  When comparisons arise. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  M. Tovée,et al.  Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study , 2005 .

[5]  Comparative Judgment Processes: The Effects of Task Objectives and Time Delay on Product Evaluations , 2002 .

[6]  D A Stapel,et al.  Let’s Not Forget the Past When We Go to the Future: On Our Knowledge of Knowledge Accessibility , 2001 .

[7]  E. Stice,et al.  The Skinny on Body Dissatisfaction: A Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Girls and Boys , 2006, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[8]  Stephen M. Nowlis,et al.  The Effects of Reduced Food Size and Package Size on the Consumption Behavior of Restrained and Unrestrained Eaters , 2008 .

[9]  Jennifer S. Mills,et al.  Effects of Exposure to Thin Media Images: Evidence of Self-Enhancement among Restrained Eaters , 2002 .

[10]  Lambert Adolphe Jacques Quetelet,et al.  A Treatise on Man and the Development of his Faculties: OF THE INFLUENCE OF DISTURBING CAUSES ON MORTALITY , 1968 .

[11]  M. Kuhn,et al.  An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. , 1954 .

[12]  Kai Epstude,et al.  What you feel is how you compare: how comparisons influence the social induction of affect. , 2009, Emotion.

[13]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[14]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  “I” Value Freedom, but “We” Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment , 1999 .

[15]  Leonard M. Lodish,et al.  Comparing Dynamic Consumer Choice in Real and Computer-simulated Environments , 1992 .

[16]  S. Grabe,et al.  Ethnicity and body dissatisfaction among women in the United States: a meta-analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  E. Stice,et al.  Adverse effects of the media portrayed thin-ideal on women and linkages to bulimic symptomatology. , 1994 .

[18]  D. Prelec,et al.  Contrast Effects in Consumer Judgments : Changes in Mental Representations or in the Anchoring of Rating Scales ? , 2007 .

[19]  T. Mussweiler,et al.  The man who wasn't there: Subliminal social comparison standards influence self-evaluation ☆ , 2004 .

[20]  J. Polivy,et al.  Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. , 1983 .

[21]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information , 2006 .

[22]  E.,et al.  Self-Discrepancy : A Theory Relating Self and Affect , 2022 .

[23]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[24]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[25]  L. M. Ward,et al.  The role of the media in body image concerns among women: a meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  F. Siero,et al.  On models and vases: body dissatisfaction and proneness to social comparison effects. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Method matters: effects of explicit versus implicit social comparisons on activation, behavior, and self-views. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  M. Tiggemann,et al.  Person x situation interactions in body dissatisfaction. , 2001, The International journal of eating disorders.

[30]  F. Strack,et al.  The "relative self": informational and judgmental consequences of comparative self-evaluation. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  D. Mick Introduction: The Moment and Place for a Special Issue , 2008 .

[32]  Lysann Damisch,et al.  Going back to Donald: how comparisons shape judgmental priming effects. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Pierre Chandon,et al.  The Biasing Health Halos of Fast Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimates and Higher Side-Dish Consumption Intentions , 2007 .

[34]  T. Mussweiler Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences. , 2003, Psychological review.

[35]  Marika Tiggemann,et al.  Idealized media images and adolescent body image: "comparing" boys and girls. , 2004, Body image.

[36]  K J Rothman,et al.  BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity , 2008, International Journal of Obesity.

[37]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/ exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment , 1992 .

[38]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  Consequences of Social Comparison , 2000 .

[39]  P. Herr,et al.  On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects , 1983 .

[40]  James E. Burroughs,et al.  Television's Cultivation of Material Values , 2005 .

[41]  Nira Liberman,et al.  The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  L. Johnston,et al.  Behavioral Mimicry and Stigmatization , 2002 .

[43]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  ‘Seek and ye shall find’: antecedents of assimilation and contrast in social comparison , 2001 .

[44]  S. Paxton,et al.  Why do adolescent girls watch their weight? An interview study examining sociocultural pressures to be thin. , 1997, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[45]  M. Häfner,et al.  How Dissimilar Others May Still Resemble the Self: Assimilation and Contrast after Social Comparison , 2004 .

[46]  G. Fitzsimons Death to Dichotomizing , 2008 .

[47]  N. Mandel,et al.  The Sweet Escape: Effects of Mortality Salience on Consumption Quantities for High- and Low-Self-Esteem Consumers , 2008 .

[48]  James E. Mosimann,et al.  Cultural expectations of thinness in women: An update. , 1992 .

[49]  Viren Swami,et al.  Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: a cross-cultural study. , 2005, Body image.

[50]  Kai Epstude,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES The Ups and Downs of Social Comparison: Mechanisms of Assimilation and Contrast , 2022 .

[51]  G. Bray Definition, measurement, and classification of the syndromes of obesity. , 1978, International journal of obesity.

[52]  Brent McFerran,et al.  I’ll Have What She’s Having: Effects of Social Influence and Body Type on the Food Choices of Others , 2010 .

[53]  W Koomen,et al.  Distinctness of others, mutability of selves: their impact on self-evaluations. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  D. Granberg,et al.  Dove-hawk placements in the 1968 election: Application of social judgment and balance theories. , 1974 .

[55]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Elastic Body Image: The Effect of Television Advertising and Programming on Body Image Distortions in Young Women , 1992 .

[56]  P. B. Eveleth,et al.  Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee , 1996 .

[57]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  A. R. Frisancho Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry , 1996, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[59]  J. Emery,et al.  The estimation of body mass index and physical attractiveness is dependent on the observer's own body mass index , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[61]  J. Polivy,et al.  Causes of eating disorders. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[62]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Superstars and me : Predicting the impact of role models on the self , 1997 .

[63]  R. Collins For Better or Worse: The Impact of Upward Social Comparison on Self-Evaluations , 1996 .

[64]  Hart Blanton,et al.  From seeing to being: subliminal social comparisons affect implicit and explicit self-evaluations. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Marika Tiggemann,et al.  Thin ideals in music television: a source of social comparison and body dissatisfaction. , 2004, The International journal of eating disorders.

[66]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. , 1998 .

[67]  M. Tiggemann,et al.  Body Image Concerns in Young Girls: The Role of Peers and Media Prior to Adolescence , 2006 .

[68]  N. Mandel,et al.  Positive and Negative Media Image Effects on the Self , 2006 .

[69]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change , 1966 .

[70]  Marsha L. Richins Social Comparison and the Idealized Images of Advertising , 1991 .