Virtual communities of practice: investigating motivations and constraints in the processes of knowledge creation and transfer

With accelerated market volatility, faster response times and increased globalization, business environments are going through a major transformation and firms have intensified their search for strategies which can give them competitive advantage. This requires that companies continuously innovate, to think of new ideas that can be transformed or implemented as products, processes or services, generating value for the firm. Innovative solutions and processes are usually developed by a group of people, working together. A grouping of people that share and create new knowledge can be considered as a Community of Practice (CoP). CoP’s are places which provide a sound basis for organizational learning and encourage knowledge creation and acquisition. Virtual Communities of Practice (VCoP's) can perform a central role in promoting communication and collaboration between members who are dispersed in both time and space. Nevertheless, it is known that not all CoP's and VCoP's share the same levels of performance or produce the same results. This means that there are factors that enable or constrain the process of knowledge creation. With this in mind, we developed a case study in order to identify both the motivations and the constraints that members of an organization experience when taking part in the knowledge creating processes of VCoP's. Results show that organizational culture and professional and personal development play an important role in these processes. No interviewee referred to direct financial rewards as a motivation factor for participation in VCoPs. Most identified the difficulty in aligning objectives established by the management with justification for the time spent in the VCoP. The interviewees also said that technology is not a constraint.

[1]  Line Dubé,et al.  Towards a Typology of Virtual Communities of Practice , 2006 .

[2]  Sue Newell,et al.  An Analysis of Trust Among Globally Distributed Work Teams in an Organizational Setting , 2007 .

[3]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Elayne W. Coakes,et al.  Developing communities of innovation by identifying innovation champions , 2007 .

[5]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[6]  H. Saint‐Onge,et al.  Leveraging Communities of Practice for Strategic Advantage , 2002 .

[7]  A. Correia,et al.  Comunidades de prática: factores críticos de sucesso para a inovação e a partilha de conhecimento , 2008 .

[8]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Identifying Challenges for Facilitation in Communities of Practice , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[9]  J. Preece,et al.  Online communities: focusing on sociability and usability , 2002 .

[10]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Creation and recreation: motivating collaboration to generate knowledge capital in online communities , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  M. Sharratt,et al.  Understanding Knowledge-Sharing in Online Communities of Practice , 2003 .

[13]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  E-survey methodology , 2007 .

[14]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Online communities of practice in education , 2007 .

[15]  Simon Grand,et al.  From economic theory towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm: Conceptual building blocks , 2002 .

[16]  E. Wenger,et al.  cultivating communities of practice , 2002 .