Superficial amygdala and hippocampal activity during affective music listening observed at 3 T but not 1.5 T fMRI

The purpose of this study was to compare 3 T and 1.5 T fMRI results during emotional music listening. Stimuli comprised of psychoacoustically balanced instrumental musical pieces, with three different affective expressions (fear, neutral, joy). Participants (N=32) were split into two groups, one subjected to fMRI scanning using 3 T and another group scanned using 1.5 T. Whole brain t-tests (corrected for multiple comparisons) compared joy and fear in each of the two groups. The 3 T group showed significant activity differences between joy and fear localized in bilateral superficial amygdala, bilateral hippocampus and bilateral auditory cortex. The 1.5 T group showed significant activity differences between joy and fear localized in bilateral auditory cortex and cuneus. This is the first study to compare results obtained under different field strengths with regard to affective processes elicited by means of auditory/musical stimulation. The findings raise concern over false negatives in the superficial amygdala and hippocampus in affective studies conducted under 1.5 T and caution that imaging improvements due to increasing magnetic field strength can be influenced by region-specific characteristics.

[1]  Alison R Preston,et al.  Comparison of spiral-in/out and spiral-out BOLD fMRI at 1.5 and 3 T , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  G. Glover,et al.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  G Lohmann,et al.  LIPSIA--a new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[5]  M. Tian,et al.  Frightening Music Triggers Rapid Changes in Brain Monoamine Receptors: A Pilot PET Study , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Joseph E LeDoux Emotion Circuits in the Brain , 2000 .

[7]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[8]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Comparison of fMRI activation at 3 and 1.5 T during perceptual, cognitive, and affective processing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex: compensation of susceptibility-induced gradients in the readout direction , 2007, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[10]  Petri Toiviainen,et al.  MIR In Matlab: The MIDI Toolbox , 2004, ISMIR.

[11]  Yuehui Tao,et al.  A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research , 2012, European Radiology.

[12]  J. Duyn,et al.  EPI‐BOLD fMRI of human motor cortex at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Sensitivity dependence on echo time and acquisition bandwidth , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  R Turner,et al.  Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  Tom Johnstone,et al.  Motion correction and the use of motion covariates in multiple‐subject fMRI analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Andreas Schulze-Bonhage,et al.  Anatomical specificity of functional amygdala imaging of responses to stimuli with positive and negative emotional valence , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Functional centrality of amygdala, striatum and hypothalamus in a “small‐world” network underlying joy: An fMRI study with music , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Matthias J. Wieser,et al.  Auditory cortex activation is modulated by emotion: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  E. Murray The amygdala, reward and emotion , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Juraj Kukolja,et al.  Selective processing of social stimuli in the superficial amygdala , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Deep and Superficial Amygdala Nuclei Projections Revealed In Vivo by Probabilistic Tractography , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  A. Schulze-Bonhage,et al.  Time scales of auditory habituation in the amygdala and cerebral cortex. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  A. Friederici,et al.  Investigating emotion with music: An fMRI study , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  CHAPTER 3 – Modelling brain responses , 2007 .

[24]  T. Talavage,et al.  Effects of combining field strengths on auditory functional MRI group analysis: 1.5T and 3T , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[26]  Thomas Fritz,et al.  Investigating brain response to music: A comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes , 2011, NeuroImage.

[27]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  Magnetic field strength increase yields significantly greater contrast-to-noise ratio increase: Measured using BOLD contrast in the primary visual area. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[28]  H. Critchley,et al.  fMRI Scanner Noise Interaction with Affective Neural Processes , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Bruce S. McEwen,et al.  Stress, memory and the amygdala , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[31]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Functional connectivity of the human amygdala using resting state fMRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[32]  Andreas Schulze-Bonhage,et al.  Response Properties of Human Amygdala Subregions: Evidence Based on Functional MRI Combined with Probabilistic Anatomical Maps , 2007, PloS one.

[33]  K. Amunts,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps , 2005, Anatomy and Embryology.

[34]  M N Yongbi,et al.  Simultaneous BOLD/perfusion measurement using dual-echo FAIR and UNFAIR: sequence comparison at 1.5T and 3.0T. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[35]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Attention modulates activity in the primary and the secondary auditory cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  Lukas Scheef,et al.  Functional 3.0-T MR assessment of higher cognitive function: are there advantages over 1.5-T imaging? , 2005, Radiology.

[37]  P. Juslin,et al.  Emotional expression in music. , 2003 .

[38]  Gabriele Lohmann,et al.  The multiple comparison problem in fMRI a new method based on anatomical priors , 2008 .

[39]  I. Peretz,et al.  Universal Recognition of Three Basic Emotions in Music , 2009, Current Biology.

[40]  K. Luan Phan,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Emotion Activation Studies in PET and fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[41]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  The roles of superficial amygdala and auditory cortex in music-evoked fear and joy , 2013, NeuroImage.

[42]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Functional MR imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T: a practical review. , 2006, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[43]  W. Heindel,et al.  fMRI studies of sensitivity and habituation effects within the auditory cortex at 1.5 T and 3 T , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[44]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Compensation of Susceptibility-Induced BOLD Sensitivity Losses in Echo-Planar fMRI Imaging , 2001, NeuroImage.

[45]  P. Holland,et al.  Amygdala–frontal interactions and reward expectancy , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[46]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters , 2005, NeuroImage.

[47]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  The emotional power of music: How music enhances the feeling of affective pictures , 2006, Brain Research.

[48]  S. Koelsch Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[49]  D. Västfjäll,et al.  Emotional responses to music: the need to consider underlying mechanisms. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[50]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Brain and Music , 2012 .

[51]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotional arousal and activation of the visual cortex: an fMRI analysis. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[52]  E. Brattico,et al.  Music and Emotions in the Brain: Familiarity Matters , 2011, PloS one.