Terminal attack trajectories of peregrine falcons are described by the proportional navigation guidance law of missiles

Significance Renowned as nature’s fastest predators, peregrines are famous for their high-speed stooping and swooping attack behaviors. We used miniature GPS receivers to track peregrines attacking dummy targets thrown by a falconer or towed by a drone and fitted a simulation describing the dynamics of the guidance system used in interception. We collected onboard video giving a falcon’s-eye view of the attacks and used this to validate our conclusions for attacks on live targets. Remarkably, we find that the terminal attack trajectories of peregrines are described by the same feedback law used by visually guided missiles, but with a tuning appropriate to their lower flight speed. Our findings have application to drones designed to remove other drones from protected airspace. The ability to intercept uncooperative targets is key to many diverse flight behaviors, from courtship to predation. Previous research has looked for simple geometric rules describing the attack trajectories of animals, but the underlying feedback laws have remained obscure. Here, we use GPS loggers and onboard video cameras to study peregrine falcons, Falco peregrinus, attacking stationary targets, maneuvering targets, and live prey. We show that the terminal attack trajectories of peregrines are not described by any simple geometric rule as previously claimed, and instead use system identification techniques to fit a phenomenological model of the dynamical system generating the observed trajectories. We find that these trajectories are best—and exceedingly well—modeled by the proportional navigation (PN) guidance law used by most guided missiles. Under this guidance law, turning is commanded at a rate proportional to the angular rate of the line-of-sight between the attacker and its target, with a constant of proportionality (i.e., feedback gain) called the navigation constant (N). Whereas most guided missiles use navigation constants falling on the interval 3 ≤ N ≤ 5, peregrine attack trajectories are best fitted by lower navigation constants (median N < 3). This lower feedback gain is appropriate at the lower flight speed of a biological system, given its presumably higher error and longer delay. This same guidance law could find use in small visually guided drones designed to remove other drones from protected airspace.

[1]  J. H. Enderson,et al.  OVER--OCEAN HUNTING BY PEREGRINE FALCONS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA , 2008 .

[2]  P. S. Krishnaprasad,et al.  Steering laws for motion camouflage , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  M. F. Land,et al.  Chasing and pursuit in the dolichopodid fly Poecilobothrus nobilitatus , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  S. Kane,et al.  When hawks attack: animal-borne video studies of goshawk pursuit and prey-evasion strategies , 2015, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[5]  Todd J. Pitlik,et al.  Hawk Eyes I: Diurnal Raptors Differ in Visual Fields and Degree of Eye Movement , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  S. Zhang,et al.  Visual tracking of moving targets by freely flying honeybees , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[7]  Andreas F. Haselsteiner,et al.  Tiger beetles pursue prey using a proportional control law with a delay of one half-stride , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  Christophe Ley,et al.  Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median , 2013 .

[9]  N. A. Shneydor,et al.  Missile guidance and pursuit , 1998 .

[10]  E. W. Anderson Navigational Principles as Applied to Animals , 1982 .

[11]  T. Poggio,et al.  3-D Analysis of the Flight Trajectories of Flies (Drosophila melanogaster) , 1980 .

[12]  Rajat Acharya Understanding Satellite Navigation , 2014 .

[13]  T. Wardill,et al.  A Novel Interception Strategy in a Miniature Robber Fly with Extreme Visual Acuity , 2017, Current Biology.

[14]  V. Tucker,et al.  Curved flight paths and sideways vision in peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus). , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  V. Tucker The deep fovea, sideways vision and spiral flight paths in raptors. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  T. Collett,et al.  Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[17]  T. Collett,et al.  How hoverflies compute interception courses , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[18]  Andrew A Biewener,et al.  Through the eyes of a bird: modelling visually guided obstacle flight , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Tracking and chasing in houseflies (Musca) , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Strategies for active camouflage of motion , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Visual fixation and tracking by flies: Mathematical properties of simple control systems , 1981, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  C. Gilbert Visual control of cursorial prey pursuit by tiger beetles (Cicindelidae) , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  Anthony Leonardo,et al.  Internal models direct dragonfly interception steering , 2014, Nature.

[24]  B S Lanchester,et al.  Pursuit and prediction in the tracking of moving food by a teleost fish (Acanthaluteres spilomelanurus). , 1975, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  Surya P. N. Singh,et al.  Biologically inspired interception: A comparison of pursuit and constant bearing strategies in the presence of sensorimotor delay , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[26]  Suzanne Amador Kane,et al.  Falcons pursue prey using optical flow cues: new perspectives from animal-borne cameras , 2014 .

[27]  S. Kane,et al.  Falcons pursue prey using visual motion cues: new perspectives from animal-borne cameras , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  W. Cresswell,et al.  Surprise as a winter hunting strategy in Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, Peregrines Falco peregrinus and Merlins F. columbarius , 1996 .

[29]  T. Collett,et al.  Visual control of flight behaviour in the hoverflySyritta pipiens L. , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[30]  Cynthia F Moss,et al.  Echolocating Bats Use a Nearly Time-Optimal Strategy to Intercept Prey , 2006, PLoS biology.

[31]  R. Olberg,et al.  Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[32]  Andrew R. JENKINSz Hunting mode and success of African Peregrines Falco peregrinus minor, does nesting habitat quality affect foraging efficiency? , 2008 .

[33]  R. Olberg,et al.  Visual control of prey-capture flight in dragonflies , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  R. Olberg,et al.  Eye movements and target fixation during dragonfly prey-interception flights , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.