PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK EFFECTS IN TRAINING: THE ROLE OF PERCEIVED CONTROLLABILITY

A field experiment with 86 employees tested whether performance feedback that attributes past performance to factors within trainees' control would result in heightened software efficacy, goal commitment, positive mood, and learning, compared to feedback that attributes past performance to factors outside trainees' control. In addition, we assessed whether the use of feedback would produce a Galatea effect, or gain in trainees' performance that is the result of a boost in their self-efficacy. The results show that trainees who received feedback that attributed their performance to factors within their control had higher software efficacy. Software efficacy was positively related to learning (both declarative knowledge and compilation). Contrary to our expectations, feedback did not influence goal commitment or positive mood. Further, a statistically significant Galatea effect was not obtained; however, feedback that attributes performance to factors outside trainees' control was related to a decrease in software efficacy.

[1]  M J Burke,et al.  Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress? , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  F. Försterling,et al.  Attributional retraining: a review. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  E. Salas,et al.  Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. , 1993 .

[4]  L. James,et al.  Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation. , 1984 .

[5]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Self-regulation through goal setting , 1991 .

[6]  J. C. Wofford,et al.  Effects of feedback on cognitive processing and choice of decision style. , 1990 .

[7]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE TRAINING METHODS ON SELF-EFFICACY AND PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING , 1989 .

[8]  H. Anisman,et al.  Stress and cancer. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  P. Ackerman.  Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. , 1987 .

[10]  D. Eden,et al.  Self-efficacy training to speed reemployment: Helping people to help themselves. , 1993 .

[11]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory of self-regulation☆ , 1991 .

[12]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[13]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  P. Elias,et al.  Acquisition of word-processing skills by younger, middle-age, and older adults. , 1987, Psychology and aging.

[15]  A. Bandura,et al.  Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  C. Sansone,et al.  Effects of instruction on intrinsic interest: the importance of context. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management , 1987 .

[18]  Mark E. Tubbs,et al.  An empirical comparison of self-report and discrepancy measures of goal commitment , 1991 .