Event Count Models for International Relations: Generalizations and Applications

International relations theorists tend to think in terms of continuous processes. Yet we observe only discrete events, such as wars or alliances, and summarize them in terms of the frequency of occurrence. As such, most empirical analyses in international relations are based on event count variables. Unfortunately, analysts have generally relied on statistical techniques that were designed for continuous data. This mismatch between theory and method has caused bias, inefficiency, and numerous inconsistencies in both theoretical arguments and empirical findings throughout the literature. This article develops a much more powerful approach to modeling and statistical analysis based explicitly on estimating continuous processes from observed event counts. T o demonstrate this class of models, I present several new statistical techniques developed for and applied to different areas of international relations. These include the influence of international alliances on the outbreak of war, the contagious process of multilateral economic sanctions, and reciprocity in superpower conflict. I also show how one can extract considerably more information from existing data and relate substantive theory to empirical analyses more explicitly with this approach.

[1]  H. Houweling,et al.  Do Outbreaks of War Follow a Poisson-Process? , 1984 .

[2]  Pat McGowan,et al.  Alliance Behavior in Balance of Power Systems: Applying a Poisson Model to Nineteenth-Century Europe , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[3]  J. Mullahy Specification and testing of some modified count data models , 1986 .

[4]  P. Holgate Estimation for the bivariate Poisson distribution , 1964 .

[5]  Gary King,et al.  Statistical Models for Political Science Event Counts: Bias in Conventional Procedures and Evidence for the Exponential Poisson Regression Model , 1988 .

[6]  Jack E. Vincent WEIS vs. COPDAB: Correspondence Problems , 1983 .

[7]  R. Carroll,et al.  Variance Function Estimation , 1987 .

[8]  Robert T. Holden,et al.  Time Series Analysis of a Contagious Process , 1987 .

[9]  Randolph M. Siverson,et al.  Power, Alliance, and the Escalation of International Conflict, 1815-1965 , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[10]  S. Walt Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power , 1985 .

[11]  B. Russett An Empirical Typology of International Military Alliances , 1971 .

[12]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Reciprocity in international relations , 1986, International Organization.

[13]  C. Gouriéroux,et al.  PSEUDO MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHODS: THEORY , 1984 .

[14]  R. Rosecrance,et al.  Alliance and Structural Balance in the International System , 1985 .

[15]  J. David Singer,et al.  Formal Alliances, 1816-1965: an Extension of the Basic Data , 1969 .

[16]  Llewellyn D. Howell A Comparative Study of the WEIS and COPDAB Data Sets , 1983 .

[17]  K. Elliott,et al.  Economic Sanctions in Support of Foreign Policy Goals , 1983 .

[18]  C. Gourieroux,et al.  Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Applications to Poisson Models , 1984 .

[19]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[20]  Lewis F. Richardson The Distribution of Wars in Time , 1944 .

[21]  Philip A. Schrodt,et al.  The Conditional Probability Analysis of International Events Data , 1988 .

[22]  P. Allison Introducing a Disturbance into Logit and Probit Regression Models , 1987 .

[23]  Michael D. Wallace Alliance Polarization, Cross-Cutting, and International War, 1815-1964 , 1973 .

[24]  Robert Axelrod,et al.  Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions , 1985, World Politics.

[25]  A. Cohen Estimation in the Truncated Poisson Distribution when Zeros and Some Ones are Missing , 1960 .