Stereoscopically observed deformations of a compliant abdominal aortic aneurysm model.

A new experimental setup has been implemented to precisely measure the deformations of an entire model abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This setup addresses a gap between the computational and experimental models of AAA that have aimed at improving the limited understanding of aneurysm development and rupture. The experimental validation of the deformations from computational approaches has been limited by a lack of consideration of the large and varied deformations that AAAs undergo in response to physiologic flow and pressure. To address the issue of experimentally validating these calculated deformations, a stereoscopic imaging system utilizing two cameras was constructed to measure model aneurysm displacement in response to pressurization. The three model shapes, consisting of a healthy aorta, an AAA with bifurcation, and an AAA without bifurcation, were also evaluated with computational solid mechanical modeling using finite elements to assess the impact of differences between material properties and for comparison against the experimental inflations. The device demonstrated adequate accuracy (surface points were located to within 0.07 mm) for capturing local variation while allowing the full length of the aneurysm sac to be observed at once. The experimental model AAA demonstrated realistic aneurysm behavior by having cyclic strains consistent with reported clinical observations between pressures 80 and 120 mm Hg. These strains are 1-2%, and the local spatial variations in experimental strain were less than predicted by the computational models. The three different models demonstrated that the asymmetric bifurcation creates displacement differences but not cyclic strain differences within the aneurysm sac. The technique and device captured regional variations of strain that are unobservable with diameter measures alone. It also allowed the calculation of local strain and removed rigid body motion effects on the strain calculation. The results of the computations show that an asymmetric aortic bifurcation created displacement differences but not cyclic strain differences within the aneurysm sac.

[1]  Katia Genovese,et al.  A video-optical system for time-resolved whole-body measurement on vascular segments , 2009 .

[2]  M J Fagan,et al.  A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  M. Walsh,et al.  Experimental modelling of aortic aneurysms: novel applications of silicone rubbers. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  M. Walsh,et al.  Identification of rupture locations in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms using experimental and computational techniques. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  L Niu,et al.  Steady flow in an aneurysm model: correlation between fluid dynamics and blood platelet deposition. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  Shmuel Einav,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  Itthi Chatnuntawech,et al.  A Framework for the Automatic Generation of Surface Topologies for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Models , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  Yannis Papaharilaou,et al.  A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Jonathan P Vande Geest,et al.  A Biomechanics‐Based Rupture Potential Index for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risk Assessment , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Prokop,et al.  Dynamics of the aorta before and after endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review. , 2009, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[12]  D. Vorp,et al.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Elena S. Di Martino,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  C. Kleinstreuer,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction effects on sac-blood pressure and wall stress in a stented aneurysm. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  Laurence Rouet,et al.  Compliance of abdominal aortic aneurysms evaluated by tissue Doppler imaging: correlation with aneurysm size. , 2005, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  P R Hoskins,et al.  Fluid—structure interaction in axially symmetric models of abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[17]  Elena S. Di Martino,et al.  Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  Ender A. Finol,et al.  Compliant biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A fluid-structure interaction study , 2007 .

[19]  Khalil Khanafer,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction analysis of turbulent pulsatile flow within a layered aortic wall as related to aortic dissection. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Raad H. Mohiaddin,et al.  Fluid–solid interaction simulation of flow and stress pattern in thoracoabdominal aneurysms: A patient-specific study , 2008 .

[21]  M L Raghavan,et al.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  V. Deplano,et al.  Flow behaviour in an asymmetric compliant experimental model for abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  P. Faries,et al.  Use of cine magnetic resonance angiography in quantifying aneurysm pulsatility associated with endoleak. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[25]  S M Lessner,et al.  Strain field measurements on mouse carotid arteries using microscopic three-dimensional digital image correlation. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[26]  B J B M Wolters,et al.  A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[27]  H. Scarton,et al.  Geometric anatomy of the aortic--common iliac bifurcation. , 1978, Journal of anatomy.

[28]  David E. Schmidt,et al.  The Effects of Anisotropy on the Stress Analyses of Patient-Specific Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Madhavan L Raghavan,et al.  Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Ender A. Finol,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometry , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Jonathan H. Gillard,et al.  Association Between Aneurysm Shoulder Stress and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study , 2010, Circulation.

[32]  M. L. Raghavan,et al.  Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: Demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  George Wolberg,et al.  Digital image warping , 1990 .

[34]  David A. Vorp,et al.  In Vivo Three-Dimensional Surface Geometry of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Alexander D. Shkolnik,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness , 2005, Biomedical engineering online.

[36]  A Karac,et al.  Validation of a fluid-structure interaction numerical model for predicting flow transients in arteries. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  N. Cheshire,et al.  Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models , 2006, Biomedical engineering online.

[38]  Ender A Finol,et al.  Semiautomatic vessel wall detection and quantification of wall thickness in computed tomography images of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2010, Medical physics.

[39]  W. R. Taylor,et al.  Arteries Respond to Independent Control of Circumferential and Shear Stress in Organ Culture , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  V. Nováček,et al.  Identification of viscoelastic properties of artificial materials simulating vascular wall , 2005 .

[41]  M. Webster,et al.  Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[42]  L Speelman,et al.  Initial stress and nonlinear material behavior in patient-specific AAA wall stress analysis , 2009 .

[43]  V. Deplano,et al.  Influence of Wall Compliance on Hemodynamics in Models of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.