Stereolithographic (SL) biomodelling in craniofacial surgery.

BACKGROUND Stereolithographic (SL) biomodelling allows 3D CT to be used to generate solid plastic replicas of anatomical structures (biomodels). Case reports in the literature suggest that such biomodels may have a use in craniofacial surgery but no large series or assessment of utility has been reported. A prospective trial to assess the utility of biomodelling in craniofacial surgery has been performed. METHODS Forty patients with complex craniofacial abnormalities were selected and 3D CT scanning performed. The data of interest was used to guide a laser to selectively polymerise photosensitive resin to manufacture SL biomodels. The biomodels were used for patient education, diagnosis and operative planning. An assessment protocol was designed to test the hypothesis that biomodels in addition to standard imaging had greater utility in the surgery performed than the standard imaging alone. RESULTS Anecdotally surgeons found biomodelling useful in 40 complex craniofacial operations. The formal assessment of the first 10 cases suggested biomodels improved operative planning (image 76%, image with biomodel 97%, P < 0.01) and diagnosis (image 82.5%, image with biomodel 99.25%, P < 0.01). Surgeons estimated that the use of biomodels had reduced operating time by a mean of 16% and were cost effective at a mean price of $1100 AUS. CONCLUSION Biomodelling was reported as an intuitive, user-friendly technology that facilitated diagnosis, operative planning and communication between colleagues and patients. Limitations of the technology were manufacturing time and cost.

[1]  D. Hemmy,et al.  CT of dry skulls with craniofacial deformities: accuracy of three-dimensional reconstruction. , 1985, Radiology.

[2]  F W Zonneveld.  A decade of clinical three-dimensional imaging: a review. Part III. Image analysis and interaction, display options, and physical models. , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[3]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[4]  I. Jackson,et al.  New Developments in Three-Dimensional Imaging: Clinical Application of Interactive Surgical Planning for Craniofacial Disorders , 1992 .

[5]  David C. Hemmy,et al.  Craniofacial deformities : atlas of three dimensional reconstruction from computed tomography , 1990 .

[6]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Computer‐Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT‐Based Models , 1986, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  S Yokoi,et al.  Computer-aided interactive surgical simulation for craniofacial anomalies based on 3-D surface reconstruction CT images. , 1988, Radiation medicine.

[8]  M. Vannier,et al.  Facial musculoskeletal asymmetry in hemifacial microsomia. , 1989, The Cleft palate journal.

[9]  D. Hemmy.  Three-dimensional imaging in craniofacial disorders: a brief review. , 1987, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[10]  M. Vannier,et al.  The “Third” Dimension in Craniofacial Surgery , 1983, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  N J Mankovich,et al.  Stereolithographic models for surgical planning: preliminary report. , 1992, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  M W Vannier,et al.  Craniosynostosis: diagnostic value of three-dimensional CT reconstruction. , 1989, Radiology.

[13]  M W Vannier,et al.  The anatomy of the cranio-orbital deformities of craniosynostosis: insights from 3-D images of CT scans. , 1987, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[14]  T M Barker,et al.  Technical note: maxillofacial biomodelling--preliminary result. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  P. Koltai,et al.  Three Dimensional CT Reconstruction for the Evaluation and Surgical Planning of Facial Fractures , 1986, Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery.

[16]  G. Herman,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of craniofacial deformity using computed tomography. , 1983, Neurosurgery.

[17]  Michael W. Vannier,et al.  Three dimensional computer graphics for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation , 1983, SIGGRAPH.

[18]  A. M. Purves,et al.  The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research , 1997, Pain.

[19]  J. Hunter,et al.  Evaluation of craniosynostosis with three-dimensional CT imaging. , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  M W Vannier,et al.  Applications of computer graphics in craniofacial surgery. , 1986, Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

[21]  F Bookstein,et al.  Computer-aided planning and evaluation of facial and orthognathic surgery. , 1986, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[22]  F Brix,et al.  Individual skull model fabrication for craniofacial surgery. , 1990, The Cleft palate journal.

[23]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient-observer agreement. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  J. Bill,et al.  Stereolithography in oral and maxillofacial operation planning. , 1995, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[25]  Three-dimensional computed tomography of complex craniofacial fractures. , 1991, European journal of radiology.

[26]  R. Simes,et al.  Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment for cancer. , 1986, British medical journal.