Learning through inquiry: student difficulties with online course-based Material

This study investigates the case-based learning experience of 133 undergraduate veterinarian science students. Using qualitative methodologies from relational Student Learning Research, variation in the quality of the learning experience was identified, ranging from coherent, deep, quality experiences of the cases, to experiences that separated significant aspects, such as the online case histories, laboratory test results, and annotated images emphasizing symptoms, from the meaning of the experience. A key outcome of this study was that a significant percentage of the students surveyed adopted a poor approach to learning with online resources in a blended experience even when their overall learning experience was related to cohesive conceptions of veterinary science, and that the difference was even more marked for less successful students. The outcomes from the study suggest that many students are unsure of how to approach the use of online resources in ways that are likely to maximise benefits for learning in blended experiences, and that the benefits from case-based learning such as authenticity and active learning can be threatened if issues closely associated with qualitative variation arising from incoherence in the experience are not addressed.

[1]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[2]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[3]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[4]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[5]  R. Calvo,et al.  Learning Through Discussions in Blended Environments , 2004 .

[6]  Michael Prosser,et al.  The “How” and “What” of learning physics , 1989 .

[7]  Robert Ward,et al.  Active, collaborative and case-based learning with computer-based case scenarios , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Martin Hall,et al.  Evaluating the use of synchronous communication in two blended courses , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[9]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[10]  Ron Oliver,et al.  Student responses to collaborating and learning in a web-based environment , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[11]  Imogen Taylor,et al.  The challenge of problem-based learning , 1997 .

[12]  D. Bligh.  Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[13]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[14]  Chris Cope,et al.  Educationally Critical Aspects of the Concept of an Information System , 2002, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[15]  F. Marton,et al.  On qualitative differences in learning , 2013 .

[16]  D. Schoen.  Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[17]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[18]  Robert A. Ellis,et al.  University student approaches to learning science through writing , 2004 .

[19]  D. Jonassen.  Evaluating constructivistic learning , 1991 .

[20]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Mechanisms of common ground in case-based web discussions in teacher education , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  D. Boud,et al.  The challenge of problem-based learning 2nd ed , 1997 .

[22]  P. Peplow,et al.  Attitudes and Examination Performance of Female and Male Medical Students in an Active, Case-Based Learning Programme in Anatomy. , 1998 .

[23]  Jackie Nicholas,et al.  Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university , 1994 .

[24]  Chris Cope,et al.  Educationally critical aspects of a deep understanding of the concept of an information system , 2000, ACSE '00.