On the temporal course of gap-filling during comprehension of verbal passives

The work presented in this paper examines the time course of antecedent reactivation following movement gaps found in passive sentences. Using a cross-modal lexical priming technique, (re) activation of the subject noun phrase (NP) was examined at various critical points following the verb (near the posited gap) for verbal passive sentences and for active (control) sentences. Subjects made lexical decisions to visual targets that were presented at three locations during auditory sentence comprehension: immediately after the matrix verb, 500 msec after the verb, or 1000 msec after the verb. Responses to targets related to the subject NP were faster than those to controls during passive sentences (gap sentences), but not during active sentences (no-gap sentences), thus indicating that reactivation of the matrix subject did occur in the passive cases. Furthermore, the magnitude of the priming increased with distance and time from the verb, going from a nonsignificant trend at the verb to a highly significant effect at 1000 msec following the verb. These results are discussed in terms of both formal and processing models of language.

[1]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns , 1990 .

[2]  M. MacDonald Priming effects from gaps to antecedents , 1989 .

[3]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. , 1983 .

[4]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[5]  J. Nicol Coreference processing during sentence comprehension , 1988 .

[6]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Phrase Structure Grammar , 1982 .

[7]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[8]  C. Carrithers,et al.  The Psychological Reality of NP-Trace , 1990 .

[9]  D. Swinney,et al.  Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[12]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[13]  T. Bever,et al.  Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension , 1988 .

[14]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Lexical structure in parsing long-distance dependencies , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  F. R. Chang Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension: Clause effects and pronominal reference , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[17]  S. N. Trevino,et al.  Analysis of Present-Day English , 1940 .

[18]  T. Bever,et al.  The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps , 1989 .

[19]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[20]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse , 1988 .