Motor and Linguistic Linking of Space and Time in the Cerebellum

Background Recent literature documented the presence of spatial-temporal interactions in the human brain. The aim of the present study was to verify whether representation of past and future is also mapped onto spatial representations and whether the cerebellum may be a neural substrate for linking space and time in the linguistic domain. We asked whether processing of the tense of a verb is influenced by the space where response takes place and by the semantics of the verb. Principal Findings Responses to past tense were facilitated in the left space while responses to future tense were facilitated in the right space. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right cerebellum selectively slowed down responses to future tense of action verbs; rTMS of both cerebellar hemispheres decreased accuracy of responses to past tense in the left space and to future tense in the right space for non-verbs, and to future tense in the right space for state verbs. Conclusions The results suggest that representation of past and future is mapped onto spatial formats and that motor action could represent the link between spatial and temporal dimensions. Right cerebellar, left motor brain networks could be part of the prospective brain, whose primary function is to use past experiences to anticipate future events. Both cerebellar hemispheres could play a role in establishing the grammatical rules for verb conjugation.

[1]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of premotor mirror neuron activity during observation of unpredictable grasping movements , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  An effect of spatial–temporal association of response codes: Understanding the cognitive representations of time , 2008, Cognition.

[3]  Carlo Tagliavini,et al.  Lessico di frequenza della lingua Italiana contemporanea , 1972 .

[4]  Giacomo Koch,et al.  Relativistic Compression and Expansion of Experiential Time in the Left and Right Space , 2008, PloS one.

[5]  Emanuele Lo Gerfo,et al.  Cortical networks of procedural learning: Evidence from cerebellar damage , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  D. Schacter,et al.  Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  F. Frassinetti,et al.  Prismatic Lenses Shift Time Perception , 2009, Psychological science.

[8]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation , 2001, Neuroreport.

[9]  D. Eagleman Human time perception and its illusions , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  D. Kemmerer The spatial and temporal meanings of English prepositions can be independently impaired , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  M. Molinari,et al.  The cerebellum contributes to linguistic production , 1994, Neurology.

[12]  Carlo Caltagirone,et al.  Optokinetic stimulation affects temporal estimation in healthy humans , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[13]  A. Nobre,et al.  Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  Julio Santiago,et al.  Time (also) flies from left to right , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  The Role of the Striatum in Processing Language Rules: Evidence from Word Perception in Huntington's Disease , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  D. Schacter,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Increased variability of paced finger tapping accuracy following repetitive magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum in humans , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  A Blueprint for Target Motion: fMRI Reveals Perceived Sequential Complexity to Modulate Premotor Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Sequence Learning in Patients with Parkinson's Disease or Cerebellar Lesions , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  I Know What You Are Doing A Neurophysiological Study , 2001, Neuron.

[22]  S. Petersen,et al.  Impaired non-motor learning and error detection associated with cerebellar damage. A single case study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Predicting Perceptual Events Activates Corresponding Motor Schemes in Lateral Premotor Cortex: An fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  R. Schubotz,et al.  Dynamic patterns make the premotor cortex interested in objects: influence of stimulus and task revealed by fMRI. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[27]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Neural substrates of envisioning the future , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Giacomo Koch,et al.  Spatial–temporal interactions in the human brain , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  The influence of rTMS over prefrontal and motor areas in a morphological task: Grammatical vs. semantic effects , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  The role of the striatum in rule application: the model of Huntington's disease at early stage. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  D Yves von Cramon,et al.  Sequences of Abstract Nonbiological Stimuli Share Ventral Premotor Cortex with Action Observation and Imagery , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  C. Davis Time in mind. , 2005, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[33]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  S. Pinker,et al.  A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Repetitive TMS of cerebellum interferes with millisecond time processing , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Alana T. Wong,et al.  Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Emanuele Lo Gerfo,et al.  Representation of time intervals in the right posterior parietal cortex: Implications for a mental time line , 2009, NeuroImage.

[38]  Sara Torriero,et al.  The What and How of Observational Learning , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  L. Boroditsky,et al.  Time in the mind: Using space to think about time , 2008, Cognition.

[40]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  All Talk and No Action: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study of Motor Cortex Activation during Action Word Production , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Candidi,et al.  Mapping Implied Body Actions in the Human Motor System , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.