Implications of integrating electricity supply dynamics into life cycle assessment: a case study of renewable distributed generation

Electricity supply is frequently cited as a significant hot spot in life cycle assessment (LCA) results. Despite its importance, however, LCA research continues to overuse simplified methodologies regarding electricity supply modeling. This work aims to demonstrate the usefulness of electricity trade analysis (proposed model) for integrating the short-term dynamics of electricity supply and refining LCA results. Distributed generation using renewable energy is applied as a case study to demonstrate how electricity trade analysis provides more refined estimates when environmental impact abatements are assessed compared with the conventional (simplified) approaches in LCA. Grid-connected photovoltaic panel (3 kWp mono- and poly-crystalline) and micro-wind turbine (1, 10 and 30 kW) environmental impact abatements are investigated by determining the displaced marginal electricity production on an hourly basis. The results indicate that environmental impact abatements calculated using the developed short-term time horizon approach can be significantly different (up to 200% difference) from those obtained using a simplified approach. Recommendations are provided to LCA practitioners to address this issue of differing results.

[1]  Anders S. G. Andrae,et al.  Attributional and Consequential Environmental Assessment of the Shift to Lead-Free Solders (10 pp) , 2006 .

[2]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production , 2008 .

[3]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Can distributed generation offer substantial benefits in a Northeastern American context? A case study of small-scale renewable technologies using a life cycle methodology , 2010 .

[4]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[5]  B. Weidema.  Market information in life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[6]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology , 2000 .

[7]  J. Kiviluoma,et al.  The complexity and challenges of determining GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions from grid electricity consumption and conservation in LCA (life cycle assessment) – A methodological review , 2011 .

[8]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments , 2009 .

[9]  Leonard L. Grigsby,et al.  Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution , 2007 .

[10]  Edris Pouresmaeil,et al.  Distributed energy resources and benefits to the environment , 2010 .

[11]  Nalanie Mithraratne,et al.  Roof-top wind turbines for microgeneration in urban houses in New Zealand , 2009 .

[12]  B. Mathiesen,et al.  Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA , 2010 .

[13]  P. Jaramillo,et al.  Uncertainty and variability in accounting for grid electricity in life cycle assessment , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[14]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[15]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  C. Harris.  Electricity Markets: Pricing, Structures and Economics , 2006 .

[17]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  A world with CO2 caps , 2008 .

[18]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Photovoltaic (PV) electricity: Comparative analyses of CO2 abatement at different fuel mix scales in the US , 2010 .

[19]  Pierre-Olivier Pineau,et al.  Influence of wind power on hourly electricity prices and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions: Evidence that congestion matters from Ontario zonal data , 2014 .

[20]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Marginal emissions factors for the U.S. electricity system. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Russell Richman,et al.  Hour‐By‐Hour Analysis for Increased Accuracy of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for a Low‐Energy Condominium Design , 2011 .

[22]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Consequential environmental system analysis of expected offshore wind electricity production in Germany , 2008 .

[23]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Electricity trade and GHG emissions: Assessment of Quebec's hydropower in the Northeastern American market (2006–2008) , 2011 .

[24]  R. J. Spiegel,et al.  Emissions reduction data for grid-connected photovoltaic power systems , 2000 .

[25]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories , 2005 .

[26]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment and Grid Electricity , 2010 .

[27]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Critical Review of the Current Research Needs and Limitations Related to ISO-LCA Practice , 2008 .

[28]  H Scott Matthews,et al.  Environmental effects of interstate power trading on electricity consumption mixes. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[30]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[31]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: A review , 2010 .

[32]  Joe Marriott,et al.  Impact of Power Generation Mix on Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Greenhouse Gas Results , 2010 .

[33]  Jesse Jenkins,et al.  Clean energy. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.