Kinematic and electromyographic changes that occur as a function of learning a time-constrained aiming task.

The present study attempted to examine the changes associated with learning two time-constrained aiming movements at the neuromuscular and behavioral levels of analysis. Electromyographic data and movement kinematics were used to assess changes due to practice. Eight right-handed females were required to perform a 45 degrees horizontal forearm extension in either 200 ms or 500 ms for 100 trials on each of four consecutive days. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in performance and a decrease in within-subject variability in the endpoint response measures, movement trajectory, and myoelectric pattern. With practice, there was a decrease in the amount of cocontraction between the agonist and antagonist muscles during movement execution, which indicated an elimination of unwanted neural activity. For the 200 ms task, the acceleration profile became symmetrical and triphasic myoelectric pattern became evident. The deceleratory phase of the 500 ms task was longer than the acceleratory phase, and a biphasic pattern became apparent. The results suggest that two different control strategies were developed in the execution of the two movements examined. In addition, the relative invariance of the spatial-temporal dependent measures, as compared to the variability of the EMG, led us tot he conclusion that the movement planning hierarchy was concerned with the spatial-temporal domain, whereas the amplitude and timing of muscular activity were planned at a lower level and thus played a subordinate role in movement production.

[1]  R. H. Stetson A motor theory of rhythm and discrete succession: II. , 1905 .

[2]  R. H. Stetson,et al.  Mechanism of the different types of movement. , 1923 .

[3]  J. Basmajian,et al.  Integrated actions and functions of the chief flexors of the elbow: a detailed electromyographic analysis. , 1957, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  A H FUCHS The progression-regression hypotheses in perceptual-motor skill learning. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  R. Pew Acquisition of hierarchical control over the temporal organization of a skill. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  R W Wirta,et al.  Muscle synergies in motor performance. , 1968, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  E. Kamon,et al.  Muscular activity pattern for skilled performance and during learning of a horizontal bar exercise. , 1968, Ergonomics.

[8]  The Harmonies of Movement Recorded Electromyographically , 1970, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  N. J. Patton,et al.  An electromyographic study of reciprocal activity of muscles , 1971, The Anatomical record.

[10]  A. J. Lloyd,et al.  Surface electromyography during sustained isometric contractions. , 1971, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  C. I. Howarth,et al.  The Movement of the Hand towards a Target , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  O. Payton,et al.  Electromyographic evidence of the acquisition of a motor skill. A pilot study. , 1972, Physical therapy.

[13]  M. Hallett,et al.  EMG analysis of stereotyped voluntary movements in man. , 1975, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  Hobart Dj,et al.  Modifications occurring during acquisition of a novel throwing task. , 1975 .

[15]  Abductor digiti quinti shuffleboard: a study in motor learning. , 1976, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Basmajian Jv,et al.  Motor learning and control: a working hypothesis. , 1977 .

[17]  F. R. Wilson,et al.  Multivariate analysis of biomechanical profiles for the coracobrachialis and biceps brachii (caput breve) muscles in humans. , 1978, Ergonomics.

[18]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[19]  P McGrain,et al.  Trends in selected kinematic and myoelectric variables associated with learning a novel motor task. , 1980, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[20]  R. Schmidt 8 On the Theoretical Status of Time in Motor Program Representations , 1980 .

[21]  L. Carlton,et al.  Movement control characteristics of aiming responses. , 1980, Ergonomics.

[22]  B Bigland-Ritchie,et al.  EMG/FORCE RELATIONS AND FATIGUE OF HUMAN VOLUNTARY CONTRACTIONS , 1981, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[23]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Meyer,et al.  Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements. , 1982, Psychological review.

[25]  Louis E. Tremblay,et al.  Modifications occurring in motor programs during learning of a complex task in man , 1982, Brain Research.

[26]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Ludwig EMG changes during acquisition of a motor skill. , 1982, American journal of physical medicine.

[28]  Ronald G. Marteniuk,et al.  Human Movement Organization and Learning As Revealed by Variability of Movement, use of Kinematic Information, and Fourier Analysis , 1983 .

[29]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.