Viewing the hand prior to movement improves accuracy of pointing performed toward the unseen contralateral hand

Abstract It is now well established that the accuracy of pointing movements to visual targets is worse in the full open loop condition (FOL; the hand is never visible) than in the static closed loop condition (SCL; the hand is only visible in static position prior to movement onset). In order to account for this result, it is generally admitted that viewing the hand in static position (SCL) improves the movement planning process by allowing a better encoding of the initial state of the motor apparatus. Interestingly, this wide-spread interpretation has recently been challenged by several studies suggesting that the effect of viewing the upper limb at rest might be explained in terms of the simultaneous vision of the hand and target. This result is supported by recent studies showing that goal-directed movements involve different types of planning (egocentric versus allocentric) depending on whether the hand and target are seen simultaneously or not before movement onset. The main aim of the present study was to test whether or not the accuracy improvement observed when the hand is visible before movement onset is related, at least partially, to a better encoding of the initial state of the upper limb. To address this question, we studied experimental conditions in which subjects were instructed to point with their right index finger toward their unseen left index finger. In that situation (proprioceptive pointing), the hand and target are never visible simultaneously and an improvement of movement accuracy in SCL, with respect to FOL, may only be explained by a better encoding of the initial state of the moving limb when vision is present. The results of this experiment showed that both the systematic and the variable errors were significantly lower in the SCL than in the FOL condition. This suggests: (1) that the effect of viewing the static hand prior to motion does not only depend on the simultaneous vision of the goal and the effector during movement planning; (2) that knowledge of the initial upper limb configuration or position is necessary to accurately plan goal-directed movements; (3) that static proprioceptive receptors are partially ineffective in providing an accurate estimate of the limb posture, and/or hand location relative to the body; and (4) that static visual information significantly improves the representation provided by the static proprioceptive channel.

[1]  J Paillard,et al.  A proprioceptive contribution to the spatial encoding of position cues for ballistic movements. , 1974, Brain research.

[2]  R B Welch,et al.  An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  J. Sanes,et al.  Motor control in humans with large-fiber sensory neuropathy. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[6]  B. Stein,et al.  Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  R. Haase,et al.  Multivariate analysis of variance. , 1987 .

[8]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[9]  S. Lehman The Neural and Behavioural Organization of Goal‐Directed Movements , 1990, Neurology.

[10]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[11]  C Ghez,et al.  Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[12]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Discrete vs. continuous visual control of manual aiming , 1991 .

[13]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Computations underlying the execution of movement: a biological perspective. , 1991, Science.

[14]  N. Hogan,et al.  Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? , 1992, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[15]  G. Loeb Past the equilibrium point , 1992 .

[16]  P. Cavallari From neuron to hypothesis , 1992 .

[17]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  F. A. Mussa-lvaldi,et al.  Convergent force fields organized in the frog's spinal cord , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  B. Stein,et al.  The Merging of the Senses , 1993 .

[20]  Luc Proteau,et al.  Static visual information and the learning and control of a manual aiming movement , 1993 .

[21]  Michel Desmurget,et al.  The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  J. Gordon,et al.  Learning a visuomotor transformation in a local area of work space produces directional biases in other areas. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Representation of hand position prior to movement and motor variability. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[25]  G. M. Redding,et al.  Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.