Having your cake and eating it too: discourses of transcendence and their role in organizational change dynamics

Purpose – Previous work on paradox and contradiction has argued for management approaches that transcend dilemmas through a kind of creative synthesis. The purpose of this paper is to investigate empirically how change leaders' efforts to transcend contradictions emerge, evolve and contribute to organizational change.Design/methodology/approach – The paper analyses three case studies in different sectors drawing on interviews, documents and observations.Findings – It is found that discourses of transcendence emerge as leaders bring new elements to the debate and supply a rationale that creatively bridges opposite poles of a dilemma. The credibility of the discourse is enhanced when it is embedded in extant institutional ideas, when stakeholders' interests and values appear to be accommodated and when leaders are viewed as legitimate. However, inherent contradictions tend to resurface over time, suggesting that while transcendence offers a powerful stimulus for change, its range and lifetime may be transit...

[1]  Marianne W. Lewis Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[2]  D. Angus,et al.  Sustainable health care for Canada. , 1995, Leadership in health services = Leadership dans les services de sante.

[3]  E. Eisenberg Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication , 1984 .

[4]  I. Janis Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[5]  Jeffrey D. Ford,et al.  Logics of Identity, Contradiction, and Attraction in Change , 1994 .

[6]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[7]  R. H. Waterman,et al.  In Search of Excellence , 1983 .

[8]  Kenneth Wm. Kury,et al.  Institutional Logics and Institutional Change in Organizations: Transformation in Accounting, Architecture, and Publishing , 2005 .

[9]  Leslie A. Perlow,et al.  Time to Change: Temporal Shifts as Enablers of Organizational Change , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[10]  D. Light Institutional change and healthcare organizations: from professional dominance to managed care , 2002, International Journal of Integrated Care.

[11]  Frans Prenkert,et al.  A theory of organizing informed by activity theory : The locus of paradox, sources of change, and challenge to management , 2006 .

[12]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[13]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[14]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[15]  S. Clegg,et al.  Management Paradoxes: A Relational View , 2002 .

[16]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[17]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[18]  Charles Hampden-Turner,et al.  Maps of the mind , 1981 .

[19]  J. Kenneth Benson,et al.  Organizations: A Dialectical View. , 1977 .

[20]  Peter Woolliams,et al.  A new framework for managing change across cultures , 2002 .

[21]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[22]  I. Mitroff The age of paradox , 1994 .

[23]  J. Glidewell,et al.  A Dialectical Analysis of Organizational Conflict , 1975 .

[24]  A. Langley,et al.  The Dynamics of Collective Leadership and Strategic Change in Pluralistic Organizations , 2001 .

[25]  Robert MacIntosh,et al.  Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations , 2004 .

[26]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[27]  T. Reay,et al.  The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta , 2005 .

[28]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[29]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames , 2007 .

[30]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism , 2008 .

[31]  M. Glynn When Cymbals Become Symbols: Conflict Over Organizational Identity Within a Symphony Orchestra , 2000 .

[32]  Lotte S. Luscher,et al.  Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox , 2008 .

[33]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Capitalizing on Paradox: The Role of Language in Transforming Organizational Identities , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Lotte S. Luscher,et al.  The social construction of organizational change paradoxes , 2006 .

[35]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .