Modeling the effects of dispersion and pulsatility of blood flow in pulsed arterial spin labeling

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a method of using MRI to image cerebral perfusion. For the measurement to be calibrated, a model is required describing the kinetics of the flow of the inverted blood from the labeling region to the imaging region. It is common to assume plug‐flow, but alternatives such as a Gaussian distribution of arrival times have also been suggested. In this study a physiologically based model for dispersion is developed and compared to existing models when fit to experimental data. The model is based on the assumption of parabolic flow in the major arteries, and also allows inclusion of cardiac pulsatility. It was found that fitting using the proposed model leads to higher perfusion estimates, with the difference becoming more pronounced in regions where the dispersion is greater. This suggests that current models may underestimate perfusion in these areas. However, fitting using the proposed model also leads to high uncertainties in parameter estimates due to non‐orthogonality of the parameters. Effects due to pulsatility are expected to be observable, but when no cardiac‐gating is used the mean curve over several cardiac cycles is predicted to closely match the curve which assumes constant flow. Magn Reson Med 60:53–63, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  D. S. Williams,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Perfusion imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  L Bolinger,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of human brain perfusion at 1.5 T using steady-state inversion of arterial water. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  R. Ordidge,et al.  Frequency offset corrected inversion (FOCI) pulses for use in localized spectroscopy , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Correction for vascular artifacts in cerebral blood flow values measured by using arterial spin tagging techniques , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  R. Buxton,et al.  Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II) , 1998 .

[7]  S Warach,et al.  A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  P. Bandettini,et al.  QUIPSS II with thin‐slice TI1 periodic saturation: A method for improving accuracy of quantitative perfusion imaging using pulsed arterial spin labeling , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Multislice perfusion imaging in human brain using the C‐FOCI inversion pulse: Comparison with hyperbolic secant , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  J A Frank,et al.  Effect of restricted water exchange on cerebral blood flow values calculated with arterial spin tagging: A theoretical investigation , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Piero Tortoli,et al.  Interaction between secondary velocities, flow pulsation and vessel morphology in the common carotid artery. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  Fernando Calamante,et al.  Estimation of bolus dispersion effects in perfusion MRI using image-based computational fluid dynamics , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  Michael Erb,et al.  Comparison of longitudinal metabolite relaxation times in different regions of the human brain at 1.5 and 3 Tesla , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J Hrabe,et al.  Two analytical solutions for a model of pulsed arterial spin labeling with randomized blood arrival times. , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[15]  D. Holdsworth,et al.  Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms in the normal internal carotid and vertebral arteries , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[16]  Peter Jezzard,et al.  Quantitative perfusion measurements using pulsed arterial spin labeling: Effects of large region‐of‐interest analysis , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Esben Thade Petersen,et al.  Model‐free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  W.-C. Wu,et al.  The Effects of Flow Dispersion and Cardiac Pulsation in Arterial Spin Labeling , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.