Some physicochemical factors influencing foliar uptake enhancement of glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) by polyoxyethylene surfactants

Structure-concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean (Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled-environment conditions. Candidate surfactants had mean molar ethylene oxide (EO) contents ranging from 5 to 20 and were added at concentrations varying from 0·2 to 10 g litre−-1 to [14C]glyphosate formulations in acetone–water. Rates and total amounts of herbicide uptake from c. 0·2–μl droplet applications of formulations to leaves were influenced by surfactant EO content, surfactant hydrophobe composition, surfactant concentration, glyphosate concentration and plant species, in a complex manner. Surfactant effects were most pronounced at 0·5 g acid equivalent (a.e.) glyphosate litre−-1 where, for both target species, surfactants of high EO content (15–20) were most effective at enhancing herbicide uptake: surfactants of lower EO content (5–10) frequently reduced, or failed to improve, glyphosate absorption. Whereas, at optimal EO content, AM surfactants caused greatest uptake enhancement on wheat, A surfactants gave the best overall performance on field bean; NP surfactants were generally the least efficient class of adjuvants on both species. Threshold concentrations of surfactants needed to increase glyphosate uptake were much higher in field bean than wheat (c. 2 g litre−-1 and < 1 g litre−-1, respectively); less herbicide was taken up by both species at high AM surfactant concentrations. At 5 and 10 g a.e. glyphosate litre−-1, there were substantial increases in herbicide absorption and surfactant addition could cause effects on uptake that were different from those observed at lower herbicide doses. In particular, the influence of EO content on glyphosate uptake was now much less marked in both species, especially with AM surfactants. The fundamental importance of glyphosate concentration for its uptake was further emphasised by experiments using formulations with constant a.i./surfactant weight ratios. Any increased foliar penetration resulting from inclusion of surfactants in 0·5 g litre−-1 [14C]glyphosate formulations gave concomitant increases in the amounts of radiolabel that were translocated away from the site of application. At these low herbicide doses, translocation of absorbed [14C]glyphosate in wheat was c. twice that in field bean; surfactant addition to the formulation did not increase the proportion transported in wheat but substantially enhanced it in field bean.

[1]  W. Phillips,et al.  Effects of Water Quality and Spray Volume on Glyphosate Phytotoxicity , 1979, Weed Science.

[2]  O. Burnside,et al.  Effect of Spray Components on Glyphosate Toxicity to Annual Grasses , 1983, Weed Science.

[3]  C. Mcwhorter,et al.  Translocation of 14C-Glyphosate in Soybeans (Glycine max) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) , 1980, Weed Science.

[4]  H. A. Holt,et al.  Effects of Adjuvants and Environment During Plant Development on Glyphosate Absorption and Translocation in Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) , 1986, Weed Science.

[5]  W. T. Haller,et al.  Influence of surfactants and additives on phytotoxicity of glyphosate to torpedograss. , 1990 .

[6]  M. J. Bukovac,et al.  Studies on octylphenoxy surfactants. Part 1: Effects of oxyethylene content on properties of potential relevance to foliar absorption , 1987 .

[7]  D. Linscott,et al.  Droplet Makeup and the Effect on Phytotoxicity of Glyphosate in Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) , 1990, Weed Science.

[8]  H. A. Holt,et al.  Absorption and Translocation of MON 0818 Adjuvant in Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) , 1986, Weed Science.

[9]  B. WyrillJ,et al.  オオトウワタとhemp dogbane(キョウチクトウ科)へのグリホサート毒性におよぼす界面活性剤の影響 , 1977 .

[10]  J. O'donovan,et al.  Basis for changes in glyphosate phytotoxicity to barley by the non-ionic surfactants Tween 20 and Renex 36 , 1985 .

[11]  C. R. Merritt The influence of form of deposit on the phytotoxicity of difenzoquat applied as individual drops to Avena fatua , 1982 .

[12]  D. Wyse,et al.  Influence of Glyphosate Concentration on Glyphosate Absorption and Translocation in Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) , 1988, Weed Science.

[13]  T. N. Jordan Effects of Diluent Volumes and Surfactant on the Phytotoxicity of Glyphosate to Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) , 1981, Weed Science.

[14]  R. Butler,et al.  Uptake, translocation and phytotoxicity of imazapyr and glyphosate in Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeuschel : effect of herbicide concentration, position of deposit and two methods of direct contact application , 1990 .