Thinking about Space-Time Connections: Spatiotemporal Scheduling of Individual Activities

This article presents a spatiotemporal model for scheduling applications that is driven by the events and activities individuals plan and manage every day. The framework is presented using an ontological approach where ontologies at different levels of generalization, e.g. domain, application, and task ontologies, are linked together through participation and inheritance relationships. S_Events are entered into a schedule as a new S_Entry, or modifications can be made to existing entries including reschedule, postpone, change location, and delete as schedules vary over time. These schedule updates are formalized through changes to planned start and end times and the planned locations of S_Entries are expressed using SWRL, a semantic web rule language. SWRL is also used for reasoning about schedule changes and the space-time conflicts that can occur. The sequence of entries in a schedule gives rise to S_trajectories representing the locations that individuals plan to visit in order to carry out their schedule, adding an additional spatial element to the framework. A prototype Geoscheduler application maps S_Entries against a timeline, offering a spatiotemporal visualization of scheduled activities showing the evolution of a schedule over space-time and affecting spatiotemporal accessibility for individuals.

[1]  Liping Yang,et al.  A navigation ontology for outdoor-indoor space: (work-in-progress) , 2011, ISA '11.

[2]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  Trajectory Ontologies and Queries , 2008 .

[3]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Dealing with Timing and Synchronization in Opportunities for Joint Activity Participation: Opportunities for Joint Activity Participation , 2010 .

[4]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  A knowledge infrastructure for intelligent query answering in location-based services , 2010, GeoInformatica.

[5]  Agnès Voisard,et al.  Using ontologies in personalized mobile applications , 2004, GIS '04.

[6]  John W. Polak,et al.  Utility of Schedules: Theoretical Model of Departure-Time Choice and Activity-Time Allocation with Application to Individual Activity Schedules , 2004 .

[7]  Marc J. van Kreveld,et al.  Finding REMO - Detecting Relative Motion Patterns in Geospatial Lifelines , 2004, SDH.

[8]  Hongbo Yu,et al.  A GIS-based time-geographic approach of studying individual activities and interactions in a hybrid physical–virtual space , 2009 .

[9]  James F. Allen Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals , 1983, CACM.

[10]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Accessibility in space and time: A theme in spatially integrated social science , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[11]  Wei Tu,et al.  A multi-objective approach to scheduling joint participation with variable space and time preferences and opportunities , 2011 .

[12]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Towards a taxonomy of movement patterns , 2008, Inf. Vis..

[13]  Stephanie Duce,et al.  Towards an Ontology for Reef Islands , 2009, GeoS.

[14]  Shih-Lung Shaw,et al.  Exploring potential human activities in physical and virtual spaces: a spatio‐temporal GIS approach , 2008, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Modeling household activity travel behavior: Examples of state of the art modeling approaches and research agenda , 2009 .

[16]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Measuring Space‐Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures , 1999 .

[17]  Hongbo Yu,et al.  Potential effects of ICT on face-to-face meeting opportunities: a GIS-based time-geographic approach , 2011 .

[18]  Nigel Thrift,et al.  Timing Space and Spacing Time , 1975 .

[19]  Naicong Li,et al.  Conceptual Framework for Modeling Dynamic Paths from Natural Language Expressions , 2009 .

[20]  Hongbo Yu,et al.  Spatio-temporal GIS Design for Exploring Interactions of Human Activities , 2006 .

[21]  William Ribarsky,et al.  Visual Analytics Science and Technology , 2008, Inf. Vis..

[22]  Nobuaki Ohmori,et al.  Meeting Appointment and Waiting Behavior with Mobile Communications , 2006 .

[23]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  My space or your space? Towards a measure of joint accessibility , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[24]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Arranging place and time: A GIS toolkit to assess person-based accessibility of urban opportunities , 2010 .

[25]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Task taxonomies for knowledge content , 2004 .