In vivo quantification of embryonic and placental growth during gestation in mice using micro-ultrasound

BackgroundNon-invasive micro-ultrasound was evaluated as a method to quantify intrauterine growth phenotypes in mice. Improved methods are required to accelerate research using genetically-altered mice to investigate the interactive roles of genes and environments on embryonic and placental growth. We determined (1) feasible age ranges for measuring specific variables, (2) normative growth curves, (3) accuracy of ultrasound measurements in comparison with light microscopy, and (4) weight prediction equations using regression analysis for CD-1 mice and evaluated their accuracy when applied to other mouse strains.MethodsWe used 30–40 MHz ultrasound to quantify embryonic and placental morphometry in isoflurane-anesthetized pregnant CD-1 mice from embryonic day 7.5 (E7.5) to E18.5 (full-term), and for C57Bl/6J, B6CBAF1, and hIGFBP1 pregnant transgenic mice at E17.5.ResultsGestational sac dimension provided the earliest measure of conceptus size. Sac dimension derived using regression analysis increased from 0.84 mm at E7.5 to 6.44 mm at E11.5 when it was discontinued. The earliest measurement of embryo size was crown-rump length (CRL) which increased from 1.88 mm at E8.5 to 16.22 mm at E16.5 after which it exceeded the field of view. From E10.5 to E18.5 (full term), progressive increases were observed in embryonic biparietal diameter (BPD) (0.79 mm to 7.55 mm at E18.5), abdominal circumference (AC) (4.91 mm to 26.56 mm), and eye lens diameter (0.20 mm to 0.93 mm). Ossified femur length was measureable from E15.5 (1.06 mm) and increased linearly to 2.23 mm at E18.5. In contrast, placental diameter (PD) and placental thickness (PT) increased from E10.5 to E14.5 then remained constant to term in accord with placental weight. Ultrasound and light microscopy measurements agreed with no significant bias and a discrepancy of less than 25%. Regression equations predicting gestational age from individual variables, and embryonic weight (BW) from CRL, BPD, and AC were obtained. The prediction equation BW = -0.757 + 0.0453 (CRL) + 0.0334 (AC) derived from CD-1 data predicted embryonic weights at E17.5 in three other strains of mice with a mean discrepancy of less than 16%.ConclusionMicro-ultrasound provides a feasible tool for in vivo morphometric quantification of embryonic and placental growth parameters in mice and for estimation of embryonic gestational age and/or body weight in utero.

[1]  L. Leatherbury,et al.  High-frequency ultrasound database profiling growth, development, and cardiovascular function in C57BL/6J mouse fetuses. , 2004, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  Clive Osmond,et al.  The Fetal and Childhood Growth of Persons Who Develop Type 2 Diabetes , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  T. Nass,et al.  Isofluorane inhibits early mouse embryo development in vitro. , 1988, Fertility and sterility.

[4]  T. Kiserud,et al.  P14.12: Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[5]  M. Kaufman,et al.  The timing of ossification of the limb bones, and growth rates of various long bones of the fore and hind limbs of the prenatal and early postnatal laboratory mouse. , 1995, Journal of anatomy.

[6]  A. Ferguson-Smith,et al.  Developmental Dynamics of the Definitive Mouse Placenta Assessed by Stereology1 , 2004, Biology of reproduction.

[7]  A. González-Bulnes,et al.  Non-invasive ultrasonographic characterization of phenotypic changes during embryo development in non-anesthetized mice of different genotypes. , 2008, Theriogenology.

[8]  J C Birnholz,et al.  Ultrasonic fetal ophthalmology. , 1985, Early human development.

[9]  D J Barker,et al.  Body size at birth and blood pressure among children in developing countries. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  F. Foster,et al.  Biological effects of high-frequency ultrasound exposure during mouse organogenesis. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  J. Hobbins,et al.  Morphometry of fetal growth , 1997, Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). Supplement.

[12]  L. Leatherbury,et al.  Cardiovascular assessment of fetal mice by in utero echocardiography. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  J. Kingdom,et al.  Determinants of adverse perinatal outcome in high-risk women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler images. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  Cecilia W Lo,et al.  Fetal Mouse Imaging Using Echocardiography: A Review of Current Technology , 2006, Echocardiography.

[15]  B. Bromley,et al.  Difficulties in the prenatal diagnosis of microcephaly. , 1995, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[16]  Eugenia K. Pallotto,et al.  Perinatal Outcome and Later Implications of Intrauterine Growth Restriction , 2006, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  S Lee Adamson,et al.  Developmental changes in hemodynamics of uterine artery, utero- and umbilicoplacental, and vitelline circulations in mouse throughout gestation. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[18]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  Quantification of risk from fetal exposure to diagnostic ultrasound. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[19]  J. Rossant,et al.  Placental development: Lessons from mouse mutants , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  S. Gabbe,et al.  Sonographic evaluation of fetal abdominal growth: predictor of the large-for-gestational-age infant in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  S Lee Adamson,et al.  Embryonic and neonatal phenotyping of genetically engineered mice. , 2006, ILAR journal.

[22]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[23]  G. Pilu,et al.  Biometry of early pregnancy with transvaginal sonography , 1993, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[24]  U. Gabbay,et al.  The development of the fetal eye: In utero ultrasonographic measurements of the vitreous and lens , 1995, Prenatal diagnosis.

[25]  E. Chérin,et al.  A new ultrasound instrument for in vivo microimaging of mice. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  J. Khosravi,et al.  Elevated circulating insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 is sufficient to cause fetal growth restriction. , 2006, Endocrinology.

[27]  A. Ferguson-Smith,et al.  Genomic imprinting, growth control and the allocation of nutritional resources: consequences for postnatal life. , 2007, Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity.

[28]  K. Michels,et al.  Intrauterine factors and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Ultrasound diagnosis of mouse pregnancy and gestational staging. , 2006, Comparative medicine.

[30]  F Stuart Foster,et al.  In vivo imaging of embryonic development in the mouse eye by ultrasound biomicroscopy. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  Pinchas Cohen,et al.  The role of the insulin-like growth factor system in prenatal growth. , 2005, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[32]  S. Tez,et al.  Growth of the fetal lens and orbit , 2002, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[33]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Multimodal imaging of mouse development: Tools for the postgenomic era , 2006, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[34]  S. Yakar,et al.  The somatomedin hypothesis: 2001. , 2001, Endocrine reviews.

[35]  F. Foster,et al.  Ultrasonic detection and developmental changes in calcification of the placenta during normal pregnancy in mice. , 2005, Placenta.

[36]  C. Levy-marchal,et al.  Impact of fetal growth restriction on body composition and hormonal status at birth in infants of small and appropriate weight for gestational age. , 2007, European journal of endocrinology.

[37]  C. Pennell,et al.  The impact of murine strain and sex on postnatal development after maternal dietary restriction during pregnancy , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  P. Tonella,et al.  Regulation of fetal growth: consequences and impact of being born small. , 2008, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.