In Pursuit of a Cross‐lingual References Structure of Personality Traits: Comparisons among Five Languages

Data sets from five original trait taxonomies from different languages, Dutch, Italian, Hungarian, American English, and German, are used for a cross‐cultural study. Factor structures, presumably Big‐Five structures, within these languages, based on ratings from about 400–800 subjects on approximately 500 trait variables per language, are used for comparison. The five five‐factor structures are pairwise compared. To enable these comparisons, the best one‐to‐one translations of trait terms between the languages are used. These translations yielded subsets of the data for direct comparisons. Congruence coefficients were calculated for the corresponding factors in the different languages, based on their independent positions, on their positions after target rotations, and on their positions after simultaneous rotations. The congruences show replicability of the first three factors of the Big Five across the five languages, and replicability of the fourth factor among Dutch, Italian, and Hungarian. Relatively high congruences between all five factors were found between Italian and Dutch. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. Cattell.  INTERPRETATION OF THE TWELVE PRIMARY PERSONALITY FACTORS , 1944 .

[2]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  THE PRIMARY PERSONALITY FACTORS IN WOMEN COMPARED WITH THOSE IN MEN , 1948 .

[3]  M. Bond,et al.  Universality and Distinctiveness in Dimensions of Japanese Person Perception , 1975 .

[4]  M. Bond.  Dimensions Used in Perceiving Peers: Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Hong Kong, Japanese, American and Filipino University Students , 1979 .

[5]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  B. de Raad,et al.  Towards a refined structure of personality traits , 1992 .

[7]  L. Tucker.  A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS STUDIES , 1951 .

[8]  Robert R. McCrae,et al.  Openness to Experience: Expanding the boundaries of Factor V , 1994 .

[9]  D. Peabody,et al.  Selecting representative trait adjectives. , 1987 .

[10]  B. D. Raad,et al.  The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word‐classes of the Dutch language , 1992 .

[11]  B. D. Raad.  An expedition in search of a fifth universal factor: Key issues in the lexical approach , 1994 .

[12]  R. Cattell.  The description of personality. I. Foundations of trait measurement. , 1943 .

[13]  L. R. Goldberg.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[14]  S. Briggs,et al.  Assessing the five-factor model of personality description. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[15]  G. Āllport,et al.  Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. , 1936 .

[16]  Fritz Ostendorf,et al.  The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research , 1988 .

[17]  R. E. Christal,et al.  Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[18]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[19]  J. Block.  A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Sprache und Persoenlichkeitsstruktur : zur Validitaet des Fuenf-Faktoren-Modells der Persoenlichkeit , 1989 .

[21]  George M. Guthrie,et al.  Cultural Differences in Implicit Personality Theory , 1971 .

[22]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  The Description of Personality: Principles and Findings in a Factor Analysis , 1945 .

[23]  B. Deraad,et al.  THE SEARCH FOR THE (BIG-5) IN A NON-INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGE - THE HUNGARIAN TRAIT STRUCTURE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE EPQ AND THE PTS , 1994 .

[24]  B. de Raad,et al.  Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits , 1994 .

[25]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  Confirmation and clarification of primary personality factors , 1947, Psychometrika.

[26]  Lawrence A. Pervin,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Current Trait Theory , 1994 .

[27]  F. Ostendorf,et al.  Quantity and quality of trait‐descriptive type nouns , 1996 .

[28]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[29]  W. McDougall.  THE PRINCIPLE UNDERLYING FECHNER'S ‘PARADOXICAL EXPERIMENT’ AND THE PREDOMINANCE OF CONTOURS IN THE STRUGGLE OF THE TWO VISUAL FIELDS , 1904 .

[30]  L. Wittgenstein.  Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus , 2021, Nordic Wittgenstein Review.

[31]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[32]  D. W. Fiske.  Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sour sources. , 1949, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[33]  J. Berge,et al.  Orthogonal procrustes rotation for two or more matrices , 1977 .

[34]  Marco Perugini,et al.  Personality described by adjectives: The generalizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context , 1994 .

[35]  B. D. Raad,et al.  A psycholexical route to content coverage in personality assessment , 1997 .

[36]  O. John.  The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. , 1990 .

[37]  W. T. Norman,et al.  2800 PERSONALITY TRAIT DESCRIPTORS--NORMATIVE OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS FOR A UNIVERSITY POPULATION. , 1967 .

[38]  R. Cattell.  The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters. , 1943 .

[39]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[40]  Frank Bernhard Brokken,et al.  The language of personality , 1978 .

[41]  J. Loevinger.  Has Psychology Lost Its Conscience , 1994 .

[42]  A. Ralph Hakstian.  PROCEDURES FOR THE FACTOR ANALYTIC TREATMENT OF MEASURES OBTAINED ON DIFFERENT OCCASIONS , 1973 .

[43]  Professor Ross,et al.  Linguistic descriptors of personality in the Spanish language: a first taxonomic study , 1996 .

[44]  N. Waller,et al.  The Big Seven Factor Model of Personality Description: Evidence for Its Cross-Cultural Generality in a Spanish Sample , 1995 .

[45]  M. Perugini,et al.  Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: comparisons among Italian and between Italian and Germanic Languages , 1998 .

[46]  D. McAdams,et al.  The five-factor model in personality: a critical appraisal. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[47]  Chris Brand,et al.  Open to experience—closed to intelligence: Why the ‘Big Five’ are really the ‘Comprehensive Six’ , 1994 .

[48]  H. Kiers,et al.  A Comparison of Big‐Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German , 1997 .