Competing at Home to Win Abroad: Evidence from Japanese Industry

The study explores the influence of domestic competition on international trade performance, using data from a broad sample of Japanese industries. Domestic rivalry is measured directly using market-share instability rather than employing structural variables such as seller concentration. We find robust evidence that domestic rivalry has a positive and significant relationship with trade performance measured by world export share, particularly when R&D intensity reveals opportunities for dynamic improvement and innovation. Conversely, trade protection reduces export performance. These findings support the view that local competitionnot monopoly, collusion, or a sheltered home market pressures dynamic improvement that leads to international competitiveness.

[1]  Mariko Sakakibara,et al.  Formation of R&D consortia: industry and company effects , 2002 .

[2]  Andreas F. Grein,et al.  Integration and Responsiveness: Marketing Strategies of Japanese and European Automobile Manufacturers , 2001 .

[3]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Nihon no Kyōsō Senryaku [Can Japan Compete?] , 2000 .

[4]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Can Japan Compete , 2000 .

[5]  P. Geroski,et al.  Changes in Concentration, Turbulence, and the Dynamics of Market Shares , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  The Dynamics of Industrial Competition: A North American Perspective , 1995 .

[7]  Paul M. Patterson,et al.  Further Evidence on Competition in the US Grain Export Trade , 1994 .

[8]  W. Shughart,et al.  Advertising, Competition, and Market-Share Instability , 1993 .

[9]  John Sutton,et al.  Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising, and the Evolution of Concentration , 1992 .

[10]  A. Dick The competitive consequences of Japan's Export Cartel Associations☆ , 1992 .

[11]  J. Markusen Productivity, competitiveness, trade performance and real income: The nexus among four concepts , 1992 .

[12]  Nelson R. Kellogg,et al.  The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st-Century Capitalism by Robert B. Reich (review) , 1993, Technology and Culture.

[13]  John Mutti,et al.  Taxes, Tariffs and Transfer Pricing in Multinational Corporate Decision Making , 1991 .

[14]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[15]  Karel van Wolferen The Enigma of Japanese Power: People and Politics in a Stateless Nation , 1990 .

[16]  Akira Goto,et al.  R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries , 1989 .

[17]  B. Balassa,et al.  The changing comparative advantage of Japan and the United States , 1989 .

[18]  Hideki Yamawaki,et al.  Import Share under International Oligopoly with Differentiated Products: Japanese Imports in U.S. Manufacturing , 1988 .

[19]  D. Audretsch,et al.  R&D Rivalry, Industrial Policy, and U.S.-Japanese Trade , 1988 .

[20]  C. Prestowitz,et al.  Trading Places: How We Allowed Japan To Take The Lead , 1988 .

[21]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Industrial policy and U.S.-Japanese trade , 1987 .

[22]  H. Yamawaki Exports, Foreign Market Structure, and Profitability in Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing , 1986 .

[23]  Sherrill Shaffer Does Competition Imply Frequent Rank Turnover , 1986 .

[24]  I. Sheldon,et al.  International trade performance and concentration in British industry , 1984 .

[25]  Alan V. Deardorff Chapter 10 Testing trade theories and predicting trade flows , 1984 .

[26]  S. Urata Factor inputs and Japanese manufacturing trade structure , 1983 .

[27]  P. Krugman,et al.  A ‘reciprocal dumping’ model of international trade , 1983 .

[28]  P. Krugman,et al.  A &Apos;Reciprocal Dumping&Apos; Model of International Trade , 1983 .

[29]  Philip H. Trezise MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925-1975:, Stanford, California: Stanford Univ. Press, 1982. x + 363 pp., index. $28.50 , 1982 .

[30]  W. Goldfrank,et al.  MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. , 1982 .

[31]  R. Lipsey,et al.  Foreign Production and Exports in Manufacturing Industries , 1981 .

[32]  J. Brander,et al.  Intra-Industry Trade in Identical Commodities , 1981 .

[33]  W. Lynk Information, Advertising, and the Structure of the Market , 1981 .

[34]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  Cross-Section Tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem: Comment [Factor Abundance and Comparative Advantage]. , 1981 .

[35]  James E. Anderson Cross-Section Tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem: Comment [Factor Abundance and Comparative Advantage] , 1981 .

[36]  Thomas A. Pugel Foreign Trade and US Market Performance , 1980 .

[37]  Tom Lee,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation , 1980 .

[38]  Glenn C. Loury,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation , 1979 .

[39]  Industriens Utredningsinstitut,et al.  The multinational operations of Swedish firms: An analysis of determinants and effects , 1979 .

[40]  M. Porter,et al.  Market Structure, Oligopoly, and Stability of Market Shares , 1978 .

[41]  S. Rhoades,et al.  Concentration and Firm Stability in Commercial Banking , 1976 .

[42]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  国际贸易与支付 = World trade and payments : an introduction , 1973 .

[43]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[44]  Gary Clyde Hufbauer,et al.  The Impact of National Characteristics & Technology on the Commodity Composition of Trade in Manufactured Goods , 1970 .

[45]  G. Stigler A Theory of Oligopoly , 1964, Journal of Political Economy.

[46]  Michael Gort,et al.  Analysis of Stability and Change in Market Shares , 1963, Journal of Political Economy.

[47]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[48]  Peter Pashigian,et al.  Turnover of Firms As a Measure of Market Behavior , 1962 .

[49]  S. B. Linder,et al.  An essay on trade and transformation , 1964 .

[50]  J. Joskow Structural Indicia: Rank-Shift Analysis as a Supplement to Concentration Ratios , 1960 .

[51]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .