Scalar implicatures and downward entailment in child Mandarin

This study aims to test whether or not the computation of scalar implicatures in child Mandarin is influenced by the entailment properties of linguistic contexts. Experiment 1 compared adults’ and children’s interpretations of the scalar term huozhe ‘or’, when it appeared in the two arguments of the universal quantifier mei ‘every’. The results showed that Mandarin-speaking adults accepted huozhe as compatible with he ‘and’ in the (downward entailing) restrictor of mei, but not in the (non-downward entailing) nuclear scope of mei, indicating that adults’ calculation of scalar implicatures is sensitive to the influence of entailment patterns. Unlike adults, 4–5-year-old Mandarin-speaking children persistently interpreted huozhe as compatible with he in both contexts. Two further experiments confirmed that children were insensitive to scalar implicatures related to huozhe in non-downward entailing contexts (Experiment 2), unless alternative sentences containing the scalar terms huozhe and he were explicitly presented (Experiment 3). Taken together with previous child studies, the experimental findings suggest that scalar implicatures are not derived in downward entailing contexts. In addition, young children do not spontaneously compute scalar implicatures to the same extent as adults do in non-downward entailing contexts. In both cases, then, young children appear to interpret disjunction as its meaning in classical logic, i.e., inclusive-or.

[1]  Stephen Crain,et al.  The Emergence of Meaning , 2012 .

[2]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[3]  A. Papafragou From scalar semantics to implicature: children's interpretation of aspectuals , 2006, Journal of Child Language.

[4]  Thomas H. C. Lee Studies on quantification in Chinese , 1986 .

[5]  S. Crain,et al.  Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures , 2005 .

[6]  Bradley J. Morris Logically Speaking: Evidence for Item-Based Acquisition of the Connectives AND & OR , 2008 .

[7]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Children's interpretation of disjunction in the scope of ‘before’: a comparison of English and Mandarin , 2011, Journal of Child Language.

[8]  Stephen Crain,et al.  The Interpretation of Disjunction in Universal Grammar , 2008, Language and speech.

[9]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  Interface Strategies : Optimal and Costly Computations , 2006 .

[10]  D. Barner,et al.  Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference , 2011, Cognition.

[11]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Phonological, lexical and syntactic components of language development. Preface. , 2008, Language and speech.

[12]  S. Crain,et al.  The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures , 2001 .

[13]  Rosalind Thornton,et al.  Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics , 1998 .

[14]  J. Maat Grice, Herbert Paul , 2009 .

[15]  Jo-wang Lin,et al.  Distributivity in Chinese and its Implications , 1998 .

[16]  S. Crain,et al.  At the Semantics / Pragmatics Interface in Child Language , 2001 .

[17]  B. Partee,et al.  Mathematical Methods in Linguistics , 1990 .

[18]  A. Papafragou,et al.  Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2003, Cognition.

[19]  S. Crain,et al.  The Logic Instinct , 2010 .

[20]  Adriana Belletti,et al.  Structures and beyond , 2004 .

[21]  I. Noveck,et al.  Experimental Pragmatics: a Gricean turn in the study of language , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  A. Papafragou,et al.  Children's Computation of Implicatures , 2004 .

[23]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[24]  C. Clifton,et al.  On the role of entailment patterns and scalar implicatures in the processing of numerals. , 2009, Journal of Memory and Language.

[25]  Maria Teresa Guasti,et al.  Semantic and Pragmatic Competence in Children’s and Adults’ Comprehension of Or , 2004 .

[26]  D. Bishop,et al.  Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature , 2011, Cognition.

[27]  L. Cheng On dou-quantification , 1995 .

[28]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in 5-year-olds: evidence from real-time spoken language comprehension. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[29]  S. Crain,et al.  Children's knowledge of disjunction and universal quantification in mandarin Chinese , 2013 .

[30]  Elizabeth Hughes,et al.  Proceedings of the 21th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 1997 .

[31]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Downward entailment in child Mandarin. , 2012, Journal of child language.

[32]  I. Noveck,et al.  A Developmental Investigation of Processing Costs in Implicature Production , 2007 .

[33]  Denis Delfitto,et al.  Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2001 .

[34]  S. Crain,et al.  Is Logic Innate? , 2007, Biolinguistics.

[35]  Paul Portner Topicality and (Non‐)Specificity in Mandarin , 2002, J. Semant..

[36]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Linguistic-pragmatic factors in interpreting disjunctions , 2002 .

[37]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  On the semantic properties of logical operators in english' reproduced by the indiana university lin , 1972 .

[38]  I. Noveck When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature , 2001, Cognition.

[39]  Cheng-Teh James Huang,et al.  Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar , 1998 .