Less head motion during MRI under task than resting-state conditions

ABSTRACT Head motion reduces data quality of neuroimaging data. In three functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) experiments we demonstrate that people make less head movements under task than resting‐state conditions. In Experiment 1, we observed less head motion during a memory encoding task than during the resting‐state condition. In Experiment 2, using publicly shared data from the UCLA Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics LA5c Study, we again found less head motion during several active task conditions than during a resting‐state condition, although some task conditions also showed comparable motion. In the healthy controls, we found more head motion in men than in women and more motion with increasing age. When comparing clinical groups, we found that patients with a clinical diagnosis of bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia, move more compared to healthy controls or patients with ADHD. Both these experiments had a fixed acquisition order across participants, and we could not rule out that a first or last scan during a session might be particularly prone to more head motion. Therefore, we conducted Experiment 3, in which we collected several task and resting‐state fMRI runs with an acquisition order counter‐balanced. The results of Experiment 3 show again less head motion during several task conditions than during rest. Together these experiments demonstrate that small head motions occur during MRI even with careful instruction to remain still and fixation with foam pillows, but that head motion is lower when participants are engaged in a cognitive task. These finding may inform the choice of functional runs when studying difficult‐to‐scan populations, such as children or certain patient populations. Our findings also indicate that differences in head motion complicate direct comparisons of measures of functional neuronal networks between task and resting‐state fMRI because of potential differences in data quality. In practice, a task to reduce head motion might be especially useful when acquiring structural MRI data such as T1/T2‐weighted and diffusion MRI in research and clinical settings. HIGHLIGHTSResting‐state conditions are associated with more head motion.Task conditions are associated with less head motion.Older adults and men move more during MRI acquisition.Bipolar or schizophrenia patients move more than healthy controls.Cognitive tasks can reduce head motion for improved MRI data quality.

[1]  B T Thomas Yeo,et al.  Reconfigurable task-dependent functional coupling modes cluster around a core functional architecture , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  M. Lindquist,et al.  Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data: current and future directions. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[3]  Caroline A. Montojo,et al.  Disrupted working memory circuitry and psychotic symptoms in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[4]  Cedric E. Ginestet ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis , 2011 .

[5]  Oluwasanmi Koyejo,et al.  Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: the OpenfMRI project , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[6]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[7]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Steen Moeller,et al.  ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  Tamara Vanderwal,et al.  Inscapes: A movie paradigm to improve compliance in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2015, NeuroImage.

[10]  Gregory L. Stuart,et al.  Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[11]  Charles Lance,et al.  State and Trait Components of Turnover Intentions , 2017 .

[12]  J. Giedd,et al.  Subtle in‐scanner motion biases automated measurement of brain anatomy from in vivo MRI , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Vivek Prabhakaran,et al.  The effect of resting condition on resting-state fMRI reliability and consistency: A comparison between resting with eyes open, closed, and fixated , 2013, NeuroImage.

[14]  Michael F. Green,et al.  Social cognition in 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome: Relevance to psychosis? , 2012, Schizophrenia Research.

[15]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .

[16]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Using Big Data to Understand the Human Condition: The Kavli HUMAN Project , 2015, Big Data.

[17]  Zhang Qi-hong Improved Optimization for Simplex Method Based on Matrix Calculation , 2006 .

[18]  H. Yamasue,et al.  Head Motion and Correction Methods in Resting-state Functional MRI , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[19]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  Monique M. B. Breteler,et al.  The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update , 2015, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[21]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[22]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Studying variability in human brain aging in a population-based German cohort—rationale and design of 1000BRAINS , 2014, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[23]  G H Glover,et al.  Motion Artifacts in fMRI: Comparison of 2DFT with PR and Spiral Scan Methods , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[25]  Maxim Zaitsev,et al.  Prospective motion correction in functional MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[26]  D. Hu,et al.  Neurobiological basis of head motion in brain imaging , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[28]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.

[29]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[30]  Michael W. Weiner,et al.  2014 Update of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of papers published since its inception , 2015, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[31]  Eliza Congdon,et al.  Decreasing Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Activity During Sequential Risk-Taking: An fMRI Investigation of the Balloon Analog Risk Task , 2012, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[32]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics , 2013, NeuroImage.

[34]  Ed X. Wu,et al.  Long-term, passive exposure to non-traumatic acoustic noise induces neural adaptation in the adult rat medial geniculate body and auditory cortex , 2015, NeuroImage.

[35]  M. Tsolaki,et al.  Computerized Cognitive Testing for Older Adults , 2015, American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.

[36]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: Relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth , 2012, NeuroImage.

[38]  K. Saleh,et al.  Comprehensive assessment. , 2012, Nursing older people.

[39]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[40]  G. Northoff,et al.  Rest-stimulus interaction in the brain: a review , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  Christina Malamateniou,et al.  Resting State fMRI in the moving fetus: A robust framework for motion, bias field and spin history correction , 2014, NeuroImage.

[42]  Reisa A. Sperling,et al.  Harvard Aging Brain Study: Dataset and accessibility , 2017, NeuroImage.

[43]  Reisa A. Sperling,et al.  The Encoding/Retrieval Flip: Interactions between Memory Performance and Memory Stage and Relationship to Intrinsic Cortical Networks , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  OpenfMRI: Open sharing of task fMRI data , 2017, NeuroImage.

[45]  Tyrone D. Cannon,et al.  Predicting risky choices from brain activity patterns , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Mixed blocked/event-related designs separate transient and sustained activity in fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[47]  M. Goldhacker,et al.  Spurious correlations in simultaneous EEG-fMRI driven by in-scanner movement , 2016, NeuroImage.

[48]  M. Zaitsev,et al.  Motion artifacts in MRI: A complex problem with many partial solutions , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[49]  Linda Geerligs,et al.  State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  P. Matthews,et al.  Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[52]  M. Dylan Tisdall,et al.  Head motion during MRI acquisition reduces gray matter volume and thickness estimates , 2015, NeuroImage.

[53]  P. Fransson How default is the default mode of brain function? Further evidence from intrinsic BOLD signal fluctuations , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  M. Dylan Tisdall,et al.  Prospective motion correction with volumetric navigators (vNavs) reduces the bias and variance in brain morphometry induced by subject motion , 2016, NeuroImage.

[55]  Geoffrey A Kerchner,et al.  Cross-species translation of the Morris maze for Alzheimer's disease. , 2016, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[56]  Jarrad Harford,et al.  Author ' s Accepted Manuscript Bond Market Access and Investment , 2015 .

[57]  Thorsten Feiweier,et al.  Reducing sensitivity losses due to respiration and motion in accelerated echo planar imaging by reordering the autocalibration data acquisition , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[58]  Tyrone D. Cannon,et al.  Phenomics: the systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale , 2009, Neuroscience.

[59]  Eliza Congdon,et al.  Neural activation during response inhibition in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Preliminary findings on the effects of medication and symptom severity , 2014, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[60]  Heath R. Pardoe,et al.  Motion and morphometry in clinical and nonclinical populations , 2016, NeuroImage.