The U.S. Pollution Prevention Act: A policy implementation analysis

Abstract Over a decade after enactment, this paper examines the implementation of the U.S. Pollution Prevention Act to identify those factors related to implementation that contributed to, or detracted from, the achievement of policy success. Implementation is analyzed in the context of a conceptual framework which builds on existing policy implementation literature by merging top-down and bottom-up considerations [Najam, A. (1995). Learning from the literature on policy implementation: A synthesis perspective (Working Paper WP-95-61). Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis]. This model connects the variables affecting implementation, allowing them to be analyzed in relation to each other. Strategic use of these linkages may also help overcome the policy “implementation gap.” The nature of the case study and findings are examined in relation to one another towards refinement of the model and conceptual generalizations based on use of the analytical framework.

[1]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  Industrial Pollution Prevention : A Critical Review , 1992 .

[2]  Kenneth Hanf,et al.  Regulatory Structures: Enforcement as Implementation , 1982 .

[3]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Studying the implementation of public programs , 1980 .

[4]  Michael Hill,et al.  Implementing public policy , 2002 .

[5]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[6]  Carl E. Van Horn,et al.  The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework , 1975 .

[7]  Daniel A. Mazmanian,et al.  THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC POLICY: A FRAMEWORK OF ANALYSIS* , 1980 .

[8]  W. Grant.  Autos, Smog and Pollution Control: The Politics of Air Quality Management in California , 1995 .

[9]  Daniel A. Mazmanian,et al.  Effective policy implementation , 1981 .

[10]  A. Farrell.  SUSTAINABILITY AND DECISION‐MAKING: , 2005 .

[11]  B. Rabe,et al.  Comparative Analyses of Canadian and American Environmental Policy: An Introduction to the Symposium , 1999 .

[12]  Eugene Bardach,et al.  The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. , 1977 .

[13]  Eugene Bardach,et al.  The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes Law. , 1977 .

[14]  G. Hoberg,et al.  It's Not Easy Being Green: The Politics of Canada's Green Plan , 1994 .

[15]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions , 1979 .

[16]  A. Najam.  Learning from the Literature on Policy Implementation: A Synthesis Perspective , 1995 .

[17]  Miles L. Burnett.  The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990: A Policy Whose Time Has Come or Symbolic Legislation? , 1998, Environmental management.

[18]  Robert A. Corbitt,et al.  Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering , 1989 .

[19]  J. Tropman,et al.  Studying implementation: Methodological and administrative issues, by Walter Williams et al. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1982. No price given , 1983 .

[20]  V. Maclaren,et al.  Voluntary Corporate Environmental Initiatives: A Typology and Preliminary Investigation , 1998 .

[21]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Revisiting old friends: networks, implementation structures and the management of inter-organizational relations , 1992 .