Empirical angle-dependent Biot and MBA models for acoustic anisotropy in cancellous bone

The Biot and the modified Biot-Attenborough (MBA) models have been found useful to understand ultrasonic wave propagation in cancellous bone. However, neither of the models, as previously applied to cancellous bone, allows for the angular dependence of acoustic properties with direction. The present study aims to account for the acoustic anisotropy in cancellous bone, by introducing empirical angle-dependent input parameters, as defined for a highly oriented structure, into the Biot and the MBA models. The anisotropy of the angle-dependent Biot model is attributed to the variation in the elastic moduli of the skeletal frame with respect to the trabecular alignment. The angle-dependent MBA model employs a simple empirical way of using the parametric fit for the fast and the slow wave speeds. The angle-dependent models were used to predict both the fast and slow wave velocities as a function of propagation angle with respect to the trabecular alignment of cancellous bone. The predictions were compared with those of the Schoenberg model for anisotropy in cancellous bone and in vitro experimental measurements from the literature. The angle-dependent models successfully predicted the angular dependence of phase velocity of the fast wave with direction. The root-mean-square errors of the measured versus predicted fast wave velocities were 79.2 m s(-1) (angle-dependent Biot model) and 36.1 m s(-1) (angle-dependent MBA model). They also predicted the fact that the slow wave is nearly independent of propagation angle for angles about 50 degrees , but consistently underestimated the slow wave velocity with the root-mean-square errors of 187.2 m s(-1) (angle-dependent Biot model) and 240.8 m s(-1) (angle-dependent MBA model). The study indicates that the angle-dependent models reasonably replicate the acoustic anisotropy in cancellous bone.

[1]  S. Lang,et al.  Elastic Coefficients of Animal Bone , 1969, Science.

[2]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The Anisotropic Hooke's Law for Cancellous Bone and Wood , 1998, Journal Of Elasticity.

[3]  K. Wear,et al.  Anisotropy of ultrasonic backscatter and attenuation from human calcaneus: implications for relative roles of absorption and scattering in determining attenuation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  A. Hosokawa,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Hosokawa,et al.  Acoustic anisotropy in bovine cancellous bone. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Maurice A. Biot,et al.  Generalized Theory of Acoustic Propagation in Porous Dissipative Media , 1962 .

[7]  P. Laugier,et al.  Phase and group velocities of fast and slow compressional waves in trabecular bone. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P R White,et al.  Ultrasonic propagation in cancellous bone: a new stratified model. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  K. Wear The effect of trabecular material properties on the frequency dependence of backscatter from cancellous bone. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  K. Attenborough Acoustical characteristics of rigid fibrous absorbents and granular materials , 1983 .

[11]  M. Mohamed,et al.  Propagation of ultrasonic waves through demineralized cancellous bone , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  M. Biot Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid‐Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low‐Frequency Range , 1956 .

[13]  S. Yoon,et al.  Acoustic diagnosis for porous medium with circular cylindrical pores. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Suk Wang Yoon,et al.  Acoustic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone: application of the Modified Biot-Attenborough model. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  A Hosokawa Simulation of ultrasound propagation through bovine cancellous bone using elastic and Biot's finite-difference time-domain methods. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  W. Lauriks,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cancellous bone: application of Biot theory. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Michael Schoenberg,et al.  Wave propagation in alternating solid and fluid layers , 1984 .

[18]  S. Boonen,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound and Trabecular Architecture in the Human Calcaneus * , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  C. Langton,et al.  Biot theory: a review of its application to ultrasound propagation through cancellous bone. , 1999, Bone.

[20]  M. Biot Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid. II. Higher Frequency Range , 1956 .

[21]  Keith Attenborough,et al.  Acoustical characteristics of porous materials , 1982 .

[22]  F Peyrin,et al.  Ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous bone using transmission and backscatter measurements: relationships to density and microstructure. , 2002, Bone.

[23]  Robert D. Stoll,et al.  Wave Attenuation in Saturated Sediments , 1970 .

[24]  J. Williams Ultrasonic wave propagation in cancellous and cortical bone: prediction of some experimental results by Biot's theory. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  S. Palmer,et al.  The interaction of ultrasound with cancellous bone. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  S. Cowin,et al.  Averaging Anisotropic Elastic Constant Data , 1997 .

[27]  Andres Laib,et al.  Comparison of measurements of phase velocity in human calcaneus to Biot theory. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  A. Meunier,et al.  The elastic anisotropy of bone. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Keith A Wear,et al.  The dependencies of phase velocity and dispersion on trabecular thickness and spacing in trabecular bone-mimicking phantoms. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound: Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Status , 1999 .

[32]  S. Yoon,et al.  Comparison of acoustic characteristics predicted by Biot's theory and the modified Biot-Attenborough model in cancellous bone. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  L. Gibson The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  James G. Berryman,et al.  Confirmation of Biot’s theory , 1980 .

[35]  Timothy G Leighton,et al.  Estimation of critical and viscous frequencies for Biot theory in cancellous bone. , 2003, Ultrasonics.