External quality assessment schemes for inorganic elements in the clinical laboratory: Lessons from the OELM scheme.

Measurements of inorganic elements in clinical laboratories produce results used for the diagnosis, the treatment and the monitoring of deficiencies or overloads. The main objective of External Quality Assessment Schemes is to verify, on a regular frequency, that clinical laboratory results correspond to the quality requirement for patient care. Therefore, External Quality Assessment Schemes represent an essential component of a laboratory's quality management system. However, External Quality Assessment Schemes within the same analytical field remain heterogeneous for different reasons such as samples, determination of assigned value, acceptable limits, content of the reports. The aim of this review was to describe and illustrate some major critical aspects of External Quality Assessment Schemes based on Occupational and Environmental Laboratory Medicine external quality assessment scheme experience.

[1]  T. Badrick,et al.  Finding best practice in internal quality control procedures using external quality assurance performance , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[2]  S. Hays,et al.  Biomonitoring Equivalents for selenium. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[3]  Tony Badrick,et al.  Can a combination of average of normals and “real time” External Quality Assurance replace Internal Quality Control? , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[4]  J. González-Revaldería,et al.  Biological variation of Zn, Cu, and Mg in serum of healthy subjects. , 1990, Clinical chemistry.

[5]  L. Johnson,et al.  Short-Term and Long-TermVariabilityof IndicesRelated to NutritionalStatus . I : Ca , Cu , Fe , Mg , and Zn , 2022 .

[6]  Wei Wang,et al.  Uncertainty evaluation in clinical chemistry, immunoassay, hematology and coagulation analytes using only external quality assessment data , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[7]  J. Arnaud,et al.  Quality specifications for the determination of copper, zinc, and selenium in human serum or plasma: evaluation of an approach based on biological and analytical variation. , 2008, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Setting analytical performance specifications based on outcome studies – is it possible? , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[9]  P. Parsons,et al.  Instability of mercury in specimens of human urine for external quality assessment , 2009 .

[10]  Johanna E. Camara,et al.  IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Assessing Commutability Part 2: Using the Difference in Bias between a Reference Material and Clinical Samples. , 2018, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  D. Bandura,et al.  Determination of total mercury in urine by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP - MS) , 2005 .

[12]  Andrew Taylor.  Quality assessment of measurement. , 2011, Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements.

[13]  P. Meijer,et al.  Interpretation of EQA results and EQA-based trouble shooting , 2017, Biochemia medica.

[14]  C. Thomson,et al.  Assessment of requirements for selenium and adequacy of selenium status: a review , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[15]  M. Plebani,et al.  An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[16]  Joy Mammen,et al.  Analytical performance specifications for external quality assessment – definitions and descriptions , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[17]  M. Plebani,et al.  External quality assessment programs in the context of ISO 15189 accreditation , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[18]  M. Noble.  Does external evaluation of laboratories improve patient safety? , 2007, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[19]  W. Baeyens,et al.  Biomonitoring of total mercury in urine: method validation and sample stability , 2018, Biomonitoring.

[20]  The central role of external quality assurance in harmonisation and standardisation for laboratory medicine , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[21]  G. Lippi,et al.  Biological variation: back to basics , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[22]  J. Arnaud,et al.  Traceable assigned values in external quality assessment schemes compared to those obtained by alternative procedure: a case study for Cu, Se and Zn in serum , 2015 .

[23]  B. Lalère,et al.  Approaches to uncertainty evaluation based on proficiency testing schemes in chemical measurements , 2008 .

[24]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[25]  Elvar Theodorsson,et al.  Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: revolution or evolution? , 2016, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[26]  P. H. Petersen,et al.  Desirable standards for laboratory tests if they are to fulfill medical needs. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[27]  C G Fraser,et al.  General strategies to set quality specifications for reliability performance characteristics. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[28]  Michael Thompson,et al.  Uncertainty functions, a compact way of summarising or specifying the behaviour of analytical systems , 2011 .

[29]  H. V. van Houwelingen,et al.  Long-term analytical performance of hemostasis field methods as assessed by evaluation of the results of an external quality assessment program for antithrombin. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[30]  Thomas Streichert,et al.  Optimizing the use of the “state-of-the-art” performance criteria , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[31]  Sverre Sandberg,et al.  A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[32]  Variations in plasma zinc in older men and women , 1994, Biological Trace Element Research.

[33]  M. Carroll,et al.  Estimate of biological variation of laboratory analytes based on the third national health and nutrition examination survey. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.

[34]  Cas Weykamp,et al.  Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[35]  Bertil Magnusson,et al.  Handbook for Calculation of Measurement Uncertainty in Environmental Laboratories Version 3 January 2008 , 2003 .

[36]  Mauro Panteghini,et al.  Standardization and analytical goals for glycated hemoglobin measurement , 2013, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[37]  R. Cartier,et al.  Uncertainty in measurement for 43 biochemistry, immunoassay, and hemostasis routine analytes evaluated by a method using only external quality assessment data , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[38]  Graham R.D. Jones,et al.  Analytical performance specifications for EQA schemes – need for harmonisation , 2015 .

[39]  F. Ceriotti,et al.  Harmonization of External Quality Assessment Schemes and their role – clinical chemistry and beyond , 2018, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[40]  J. Angerer,et al.  Comparison of procedures for evaluating laboratory performance in external quality assessment schemes for lead in blood and aluminum in serum demonstrates the need for common quality specifications. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[41]  Göran Nilsson,et al.  IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Assessing Commutability Part 1: General Experimental Design. , 2018, Clinical chemistry.

[42]  J. Hesketh,et al.  Selenium in human health and disease. , 2011, Antioxidants & redox signaling.

[43]  W Greg Miller,et al.  Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external quality assessment (proficiency testing) schemes. , 2003, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[44]  M. Rayman.  Selenium and human health , 2012, The Lancet.

[45]  Cas Weykamp,et al.  IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Assessing Commutability Part 3: Using the Calibration Effectiveness of a Reference Material. , 2018, Clinical chemistry.