Competition, Cooperation, and Pricing: How Mobile Operators Respond to the Challenge of Over-The-Top

Considering the threats from OTT (Over-The-Top) services, this paper examines whether the mobile operator should charge OTT services access fees and how to. By using a dynamic-gaming process, we find that: 1) under non-cooperative strategy, the mobile operator would charge OTT a mobile Internet access fee, which is positively correlated to OTT platform’s future commercial value and the price of direct communication service, and negatively correlated to the indirect communication service price. 2) under cooperative strategy, the OTT service price that the joint venture charges end users is negatively correlated to OTT platform’s future commercial value. 3) despite choosing cooperative or non-cooperative strategy, the pricing of mobile operator’s direct communication service has a negative correlation with OTT platform’s future value and a positive correlation with the platform’s quality; while the pricing of the indirect communication service is positively correlated to platform’s future value and negatively correlated with the platform quality.

[1]  Steven M. Shugan,et al.  Managing Channel Profits , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[2]  J. Laffont,et al.  Network Competition: I. Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing , 1998 .

[3]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[4]  Martin Peitz,et al.  Asymmetric access price regulation in telecommunications markets , 2005 .

[5]  M. Armstrong The theory of access pricing and interconnection , 2001 .

[6]  I. Vogelsang,et al.  Handbook of telecommunications economics, volume I. structure, regulation & competition. Cave, M., Majumdar , 2010 .

[7]  Pio Baake,et al.  Vertical product differentiation, network externalities, and compatibility decisions , 2001 .

[8]  J. Laffont,et al.  Competition in telecommunications , 1999 .

[9]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[10]  ChiangWei-yu Kevin,et al.  Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design , 2003 .

[11]  Baohong Sun,et al.  Product Strategy for Innovators in Markets with Network Effects , 2004 .

[12]  Dale A. Stirling,et al.  Information rules , 2003, SGMD.

[13]  Richard Staelin,et al.  An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[14]  G. Cai,et al.  Channel Selection and Coordination in Dual-Channel Supply Chains , 2010 .

[15]  Ingo Vogelsang,et al.  Price Regulation of Access to Telecommunications Networks , 2003 .

[16]  J. Peppard,et al.  From value chain to value network: Insights for mobile operators , 2006 .

[17]  M. Shubik,et al.  Market structure and behavior , 1982 .

[18]  Ming Fan,et al.  A supply chain model with direct and retail channels , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Noël Crespi,et al.  A few myths about telco and OTT models , 2011, 2011 15th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks.

[20]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Boiling Frogs: Pricing Strategies for a Manufacturer Adding a Direct Channel that Competes with the Traditional Channel , 2006 .

[21]  M. Peitz,et al.  Access regulation and the adoption of VoIP , 2009 .