Investigating Supervisor Attributions of Subordinate Performance

This field study was conducted to investigate the impact of factors relating to supervisor-subordinate affective relationship and work relationship, supervisor job tenure, and subordinate performance level on supervisor attributions of subordinate performance. The results indicate that the length and nature of supervisor-subordinate work relationship and supervisor job tenure significantly affect supervisor attributions of subordinate performance to internal or external causes. The results for supervisor-subordinate affective relationship and subordinate performance level conflict with previous, predominantly laboratory-based, research. Reasons are discussedfor these results. Implications for practice are also offered.

[1]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory , 1979 .

[2]  D. Wegner,et al.  Observers' focus of attention in the simulation of self-perception. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  G. Salancik,et al.  Observer orientation and actor-observer differences in attributions for failure☆ , 1977 .

[4]  P. Starr,et al.  Self as actor, active observer, and passive observer: Implications for causal attributions. , 1979 .

[5]  D T Regan,et al.  Empathy and attribution: turning observers into actors. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  R. D. Hansen,et al.  Attributes and Attributions: Inferring Stimulus Properties, Actors' Dispositions, and Causes. , 1978 .

[7]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Effects of job experience on supervisor attributions for a subordinate's poor performance. , 1982 .

[8]  R. D. Hansen,et al.  Distinctiveness and consensus: The influence of behavioral information on actors' and observers' attributions. , 1976 .

[9]  G. R. Ferris,et al.  Causal attributions, affect, and expectations for a day's work performance. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[10]  R. Cardy,et al.  Affect and appraisal accuracy: Liking as an integral dimension in evaluating performance. , 1986 .

[11]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[12]  R. D. Hansen,et al.  The power of consensus: Information derived from one's own and others' behavior. , 1977 .

[13]  J. R. Larson.  The performance feedback process: A preliminary model , 1984 .

[14]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[15]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Reactions to Feedback: The Role of Attributions , 1985 .

[16]  L. A. McArthur.  The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. , 1972 .

[17]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[18]  R. Galper,et al.  Turning observers into actors: Differential causal attributions as a function of “empathy” , 1976 .

[19]  G. W. Bradley.  Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[20]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. , 1977 .

[21]  A. Greenwald.  The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. , 1980 .

[22]  M. D. Storms,et al.  Videotape and the attribution process: reversing actors' and observers' points of view. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[24]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[25]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Liking and the attribution process , 1974 .

[26]  Robert E. Wood,et al.  Supervisor's responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model☆ , 1980 .