Prediction of candidates for seminal tract reconstructive surgery among patients with clinically suspected idiopathic or inflammatory obstructive azoospermia

Background and AimWe reviewed the findings of scrotal exploration, histological examination and clinical parameters in patients with clinically suspected idiopathic or inflammatory obstructive azoospermia without confirmation by isolated testis biopsy in advance.MethodsThe present study included 27 patients who underwent scrotal exploration for the purpose of vasoepididymostomy with simultaneous testicular sperm extraction.ResultsSperm in the epididymis was proven in 11 patients (40.7%). In two of these patients, the vas deferens was obstructed on the seminal vesicle side. Histologically, normal spermatogenesis was seen in all patients. The 16 (59.2%) patients with no sperm in the epididymis included two with normal spermatogenesis. Serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were significantly higher in men with no sperm in the epididymis in contrast to those in men with sperm proven in the epididymis (P = 0.0057). By using a cut-off point of 6.02 mIU/mL, serum FSH can predict the existence of sperm in the epididymis, with a sensitivity of 81.8%, a specificity of 81.2% and a positive predictive value of 75.0%.ConclusionNo more than a third of the patients in the present study who had clinically suspected obstructive azoospermia were actual candidates for vasoepidydimostomy. A serum FSH level cut-off point of 6.02 mIU/mL might be useful to determine its indication.

[1]  T. Tsukamoto,et al.  Is seminal vesiculitis a discrete disease entity? Clinical and microbiological study of seminal vesiculitis in patients with acute epididymitis. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[2]  C. Niederberger,et al.  Male infertility. , 2006, Reviews in urology.

[3]  J. Overstreet,et al.  Best practice policies for male infertility. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[4]  J. Overstreet,et al.  Best practice policies for male infertility. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  Philip S Li,et al.  Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[6]  C. Niederberger,et al.  The role of testicular biopsy in the modern management of male infertility. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[7]  S. Katsuno,et al.  Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy with sperm cryopreservation for future assisted reproduction , 2000, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[8]  J. Marmar Modified vasoepididymostomy with simultaneous double needle placement, tubulotomy and tubular invagination. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[9]  K. Jarvi,et al.  Outcome of microsurgical reconstruction in men with suspected epididymal obstruction. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[10]  E. Nieschlag,et al.  Serum FSH and testicular morphology in male infertility. , 1994, Clinical endocrinology.

[11]  T. Matsuda,et al.  Obstructive azoospermia of unknown origin: sites of obstruction and surgical outcomes. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[12]  C. Niederberger,et al.  Microsurgical epididymovasostomy: predictors of success. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[13]  E. Nieschlag,et al.  Variations in semen parameters from fathers. , 1991, Human Reproduction.