Robots mediating interactions between animals for interspecies collective behaviors

Robots socially integrated into groups of honeybees and zebrafish located in different cities, allowing the species to share decisions. Self-organized collective behavior has been analyzed in diverse types of gregarious animals. Such collective intelligence emerges from the synergy between individuals, which behave at their own time and spatial scales and without global rules. Recently, robots have been developed to collaborate with animal groups in the pursuit of better understanding their decision-making processes. These biohybrid systems make cooperative relationships between artificial systems and animals possible, which can yield new capabilities in the resulting mixed group. However, robots are currently tailor-made to successfully engage with one animal species at a time. This limits the possibilities of introducing distinct species-dependent perceptual capabilities and types of behaviors in the same system. Here, we show that robots socially integrated into animal groups of honeybees and zebrafish, each one located in a different city, allowing these two species to interact. This interspecific information transfer is demonstrated by collective decisions that emerge between the two autonomous robotic systems and the two animal groups. The robots enable this biohybrid system to function at any distance and operates in water and air with multiple sensorimotor properties across species barriers and ecosystems. These results demonstrate the feasibility of generating and controlling behavioral patterns in biohybrid groups of multiple species. Such interspecies connections between diverse robotic systems and animal species may open the door for new forms of artificial collective intelligence, where the unrivaled perceptual capabilities of the animals and their brains can be used to enhance autonomous decision-making, which could find applications in selective “rewiring” of ecosystems.

[1]  Robert Brodschneider,et al.  Honeybee Colony Thermoregulation – Regulatory Mechanisms and Contribution of Individuals in Dependence on Age, Location and Thermal Stress , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[3]  B. Reed,et al.  Guidance on the housing and care of zebrafish Danio rerio. , 2011 .

[4]  F Mondada,et al.  Social Integration of Robots into Groups of Cockroaches to Control Self-Organized Choices , 2007, Science.

[5]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Investigation of Collective Behaviour and Electrocommunication in the Weakly Electric Fish, Mormyrus rume, through a biomimetic Robotic Dummy Fish , 2016, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[6]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  How to Blend a Robot within a Group of Zebrafish: Achieving Social Acceptance through Real-time Calibration of a Multi-level Behavioural Model , 2018, Living Machines.

[7]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Identifying influential neighbors in animal flocking , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  P. Backwell,et al.  Experiments with robots explain synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs , 2008, Current Biology.

[9]  Joseph T. Lizier,et al.  JIDT: An Information-Theoretic Toolkit for Studying the Dynamics of Complex Systems , 2014, Front. Robot. AI.

[10]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems , 1999 .

[11]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Real-Time Feedback-Controlled Robotic Fish for Behavioral Experiments With Fish Schools , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Interactive robots in experimental biology. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S12 Table S1 Full Reference List , 2022 .

[14]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Evolving robot controllers for a bio-hybrid system , 2018 .

[15]  Nikolaus Correll,et al.  Social Control of Herd Animals by Integration of Artificially Controlled Congeners , 2008, SAB.

[16]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Autonomously shaping natural climbing plants: a bio-hybrid approach , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[17]  Pieter Hintjens,et al.  ZeroMQ: Messaging for Many Applications , 2013 .

[18]  R. Solé Synthetic transitions: towards a new synthesis , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  D. H. Owings,et al.  Ground squirrels use an infrared signal to deter rattlesnake predation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish , 2018, Science Robotics.

[21]  Yvon Le Maho,et al.  Rovers minimize human disturbance in research on wild animals , 2014, Nature Methods.

[22]  V. Braitenberg Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology , 1984 .

[23]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  How mimetic should a robotic fish be to socially integrate into zebrafish groups? , 2018, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[24]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Closed-loop control of zebrafish behaviour in three dimensions using a robotic stimulus , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[25]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Dynamics of Collective Decision Making of Honeybees in Complex Temperature Fields , 2013, PloS one.

[26]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Towards a New Synthesis , 1980, Canadian Theatre Review.

[27]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome , 2013, Nature.

[28]  V Goedseels,et al.  Image analysis to measure activity index of animals. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[29]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Design of a modular robotic system that mimics small fish locomotion and body movements for ethological studies , 2017 .

[30]  Serge Kernbach,et al.  Developmental Collective Robotics: Advantages and Challenges of Unbounded Self-Development , 2013 .

[31]  Laure Bally-Cuif,et al.  Adult zebrafish as a model organism for behavioural genetics , 2010, BMC Neuroscience.

[32]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  A General Methodology for the Control of Mixed Natural Artificial Societies , 2013 .

[33]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Building an organic computing device with multiple interconnected brains , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Nicole Abaid,et al.  Fish in a ring: spatio-temporal pattern formation in one-dimensional animal groups , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[35]  Jie Sun,et al.  Inference of Causal Information Flow in Collective Animal Behavior , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[36]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[37]  A. Dussutour,et al.  Key Factors for the Emergence of Collective Decision in Invertebrates , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[38]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Coordination of collective behaviours in spatially separated agents , 2015, ECAL.

[39]  M. Dawkins,et al.  Optical flow patterns in broiler chicken flocks as automated measures of behaviour and gait , 2009 .

[40]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Noam Miller,et al.  From Schooling to Shoaling: Patterns of Collective Motion in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) , 2012, PloS one.

[42]  Stjepan Bogdan,et al.  A robotic system for researching social integration in honeybees , 2017, PloS one.

[43]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Informative and misinformative interactions in a school of fish , 2017, Swarm Intelligence.

[44]  Viola Priesemann,et al.  Measuring Information-Transfer Delays , 2013, PloS one.

[45]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Closed-loop interactions between a shoal of zebrafish and a group of robotic fish in a circular corridor , 2018, Swarm Intelligence.

[46]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[47]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Governing the swarm: Controlling a bio-hybrid society of bees & robots with computational feedback loops , 2017, 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).

[48]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  RoboFish: increased acceptance of interactive robotic fish with realistic eyes and natural motion patterns by live Trinidadian guppies , 2016, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[49]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Multi-robot control and tracking framework for bio-hybrid systems with closed-loop interaction , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[50]  G. Gerlach,et al.  The behaviour and ecology of the zebrafish, Danio rerio , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[51]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  Behavior modulation of rats to a robotic rat in multi-rat interaction , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[52]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Evidence for mutual allocation of social attention through interactive signaling in a mormyrid weakly electric fish , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  A. Pérez-Escudero,et al.  idTracker: tracking individuals in a group by automatic identification of unmarked animals , 2014, Nature Methods.

[54]  Serge Kernbach,et al.  Handbook of Collective Robotics: Fundamentals and Challenges , 2013 .

[55]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Infiltrating the zebrafish swarm: design, implementation and experimental tests of a miniature robotic fish lure for fish–robot interaction studies , 2016, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[56]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[57]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in honey bee swarms , 2006 .