Subjective Time: Cognitive and Physical Secondary Tasks Affect Timing Differently

Humans were trained on a temporal discrimination to make one response when the stimulus duration was short (2 s) and a different response when the stimulus duration was long (8 s). They were then tested with stimulus durations in between to determine the bisection point. In Experiment 1, we examined the effect of a secondary cognitive task (counting backwards by threes) on the bisection point when participants were trained without a cognitive load and were tested with a cognitive load or the reverse (relative to appropriate controls). When the cognitive load increased from training, the psychophysical function plotting long responses against the increase in stimulus duration shifted to the right (as if the internal clock slowed down), and when the cognitive load decreased from training the psychophysical function shifted to the left (as if the internal clock speeded up). In Experiment 2, when the secondary task consisted of exerting continuous force on a transducer (a physically effortful task), it had the opposite effect. When the required force increased from training, the psychophysical function shifted to the left (as if the internal clock speeded up), and when the required force decreased from training, the psychophysical function shifted to the right (as if the internal clock slowed down). The results support an attentional view of the subjective passage of time. A cognitive secondary task appears to decrease attention to temporal cues, resulting in the underestimation of the passage of time, whereas a force requirement appears to increase attention to temporal cues, resulting in the overestimation of the passage of time.

[1]  Mental strategies and the perception of effort of marathon runners. , 1986 .

[2]  T. Zentall,et al.  Required pecking and refraining from pecking alter judgments of time by pigeons , 2008, Learning & behavior.

[3]  D. Zakay Time Estimation Methods—Do They Influence Prospective Duration Estimates? , 1993, Perception.

[4]  Gershon Tenenbaum,et al.  Perceived effort — Can it be considered gestalt? , 2006 .

[5]  Scott W. Brown Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  J. Wearden,et al.  Stimulus Range Effects in Temporal Bisection by Humans , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  R N Haber,et al.  Comparison of Nine Methods of Indicating the Direction to Objects: Data from Blind Adults , 1993, Perception.

[8]  J. Gibbon The Structure Of Subjective Time: How Time Flies , 1986 .

[9]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  Interference in Immediate Spatial Memory: Shifts of Spatial Attention or Central executive Involvement? , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  M Migliore,et al.  A model of the effects of cognitive load on the subjective estimation and production of time intervals. , 2000, Bio Systems.

[11]  Maximizing Athletic Performance in Endurance Events: A Comparison of Cognitive Strategies1 , 1989 .

[12]  Françoise Macar,et al.  Dividing Attention between Temporal and Nontemporal Tasks: A Performance Operating Characteristic -POC- Analysis , 1992 .

[13]  J R Platt,et al.  Bisection of temporal intervals by pigeons. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[14]  R. Church,et al.  Bisection of temporal intervals. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  S. Grondin,et al.  Benefits and limits of explicit counting for discriminating temporal intervals. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[16]  P A Hancock,et al.  Time estimation performance before, during, and following physical activity. , 1989, Journal of human ergology.

[17]  R. Church A concise introduction to scalar timing theory. , 2003 .

[18]  T. Zentall,et al.  Required pecking alters judgments of the passage of time by pigeons , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Donald Voet,et al.  Time flies when you're having fun , 2009, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[20]  Temporal Bisection in Humans with Longer Stimulus Durations , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[21]  W. Meck,et al.  How emotions colour our perception of time , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Time estimation: The effect of cortically mediated attention , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  John H. Wearden,et al.  Changing Sensitivity to Duration in Human Scalar Timing: An Experiment, a Review, and Some Possible Explanations , 1997 .

[24]  V. Tammen Elite middle and long distance runners associative/dissociative coping , 1996 .

[25]  Tim Pitt,et al.  Physiology of Sport and Exercise , 2004 .

[26]  R. Block,et al.  An Attentional · Gate Model of Prospective Time Estimation , 2022 .

[27]  F Richard Ferraro,et al.  Duration Ratings as an Index of Processing Resources Required for Cognitive Tasks. , 1997, The Journal of general psychology.

[28]  Michael E Young,et al.  Stimulus dynamics and temporal discrimination: implications for pacemakers. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[29]  Lorraine G. Allan,et al.  The Internal Clock Revisited , 1992 .

[30]  John H. Wearden,et al.  Do humans possess an internal clock with scalar timing properties , 1991 .

[31]  J. Wearden,et al.  Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans. , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.