Achieve Research Continuity During Social Distancing by Rapidly Implementing Individual and Group Videoconferencing with Participants: Key Considerations, Best Practices, and Protocols

The novel coronavirus has upended many traditional research procedures as universities and other research entities have closed to activate social distancing. Some social and behavioral research activities (e.g. data analysis, manuscript preparation) can be continued from other environments with appropriate security protocols in place. For studies involving in-person interactions, continuity may be more difficult. Phone-based interactions provide a low-tech solution that may suffice in some cases. Yet, videoconferencing platforms can nearly replicate in-person interactions, activating both auditory and visual senses and potentially resulting in more substantial engagement. Staff can meet with participants individually or in groups, each seeing and hearing one another in real time. This paper provides guidance for researchers transitioning in-person assessments and interventions to a synchronous videoconferencing platform. Best practices, key considerations, examples from the field, and sample protocols are presented to ease transition for ongoing studies and maximize the potential of videoconferencing—and social distancing.

[1]  S. Marhefka,et al.  Understanding Women's Willingness to Use e-Health for HIV-Related Services: A Novel Application of the Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model to a Highly Stigmatized Medical Condition. , 2019, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[2]  Eric R Buhi,et al.  Effectiveness of healthy relationships video-group-A videoconferencing group intervention for women living with HIV: preliminary findings from a randomized controlled trial. , 2014, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[3]  M. Chiasson,et al.  Quantification of HIV-1 RNA Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Using an At-Home Self-Collected Dried Blood Spot Specimen: Feasibility Study , 2018, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[4]  J. Day,et al.  Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003 , 2005 .

[5]  S. Marhefka,et al.  Willingness of MSM Living with HIV to Take Part in Video-Groups: Application of the Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model , 2019, AIDS and Behavior.

[6]  S. Marhefka,et al.  Meeting Our Patients “Where They Are”: Video‐Group Smoking Cessation for People Living With HIV , 2017, The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC.

[7]  S. Marhefka,et al.  Internet-based video-group delivery of Healthy Relationships – A “prevention with positives” intervention: Report on a single group pilot test among women living with HIV , 2013, AIDS care.

[8]  Patricia Gilliam,et al.  Interest in, Concerns About, and Preferences for Potential Video-Group Delivery of an Effective Behavioral Intervention Among Women Living With HIV , 2012, AIDS and Behavior.

[9]  B. Leurent,et al.  Early HIV-1 Diagnosis Using In-House Real-Time PCR Amplification on Dried Blood Spots for Infants in Remote and Resource-Limited Settings , 2008, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[10]  A. Wilder-Smith,et al.  Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak , 2020, Journal of travel medicine.

[11]  M. M. Dolcini,et al.  Social Determinants of Potential eHealth Engagement Among People Living with HIV Receiving Ryan White Case Management: Health Equity Implications from Project TECH , 2019, AIDS and Behavior.

[12]  S. Marhefka,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages for receiving Internet-based HIV/AIDS interventions at home or at community-based organizations , 2015, AIDS care.