Contour‐based registration technique to differentiate between task‐activated and head motion‐induced signal variations in fMRI

Data acquired using functional magnetic resonance imaging are often contaminated by head motion. As a result, optimal information regarding task‐induced (or resting‐state) signal changes cannot be extracted. Intensity‐based registration methods, including intensity correlation or minimum intensity variance techniques, are widely used to register two or more images. It is shown here that intensity‐based registration cannot accurately register two or more images in the presence of local intensity changes arising from functional magnetic resonance, fMRI, signals. In this paper, we present a contour‐based technique that can be used not only for a more robust registration, but also to help differentiate between task‐induced and motion‐induced signal changes. Results obtained using both phantom and human brain images demonstrate advantages of this technique compared with a conventional intensity registration technique.

[1]  M. Viergever,et al.  Medical image matching-a review with classification , 1993, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[2]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Automatic registration of CT and MR brain images using correlation of geometrical features , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  L Junck,et al.  Correlation methods for the centering, rotation, and alignment of functional brain images. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Accurate Three‐Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Retrospective geometric correlation of MR, CT, and PET images. , 1988, Radiology.

[7]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  A contour-based approach to multisensor image registration , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Raimondo Schettini,et al.  Image registration by recognition of corresponding structures , 1990 .

[11]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Brain parenchyma motion: measurement with cine echo-planar MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[13]  Lyndon S. Hibbard,et al.  Objective image alignment for three-dimensional reconstruction of digital autoradiograms , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Reduction of physiological fluctuations in fMRI using digital filters , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  B. Rosen,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Science.

[16]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Hajnal,et al.  Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.