Tight-and-Cheap Conic Relaxation for the AC Optimal Power Flow Problem

The classical alternating current optimal power flow problem is highly nonconvex and generally hard to solve. Convex relaxations, in particular semidefinite, second-order cone, convex quadratic, and linear relaxations, have recently attracted significant interest. The semidefinite relaxation is the strongest among them and is exact for many cases. However, the computational efficiency for solving large-scale semidefinite optimization is lower than for second-order cone optimization. We propose a conic relaxation obtained by combining semidefinite optimization with the reformulation-linearization technique, commonly known as RLT. The proposed relaxation is stronger than the second-order cone relaxation and nearly as tight as the standard semidefinite relaxation. Computational experiments using standard test cases with up to 6515 buses show that the time to solve the new conic relaxation is up to one order of magnitude lower than for the chordal relaxation, a semidefinite relaxation technique that exploits the sparsity of power networks.

[1]  Katsuki Fujisawa,et al.  Exploiting sparsity in semidefinite programming via matrix completion II: implementation and numerical results , 2003, Math. Program..

[2]  R. Jabr,et al.  A Conic Quadratic Format for the Load Flow Equations of Meshed Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Jean Charles Gilbert,et al.  Application of the Moment-SOS Approach to Global Optimization of the OPF Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Jesse T. Holzer,et al.  Implementation of a Large-Scale Optimal Power Flow Solver Based on Semidefinite Programming , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Network flow and copper plate relaxations for AC transmission systems , 2015, 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[6]  Steffen Rebennack,et al.  Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey II , 2012, Energy Systems.

[7]  Martin S. Andersen,et al.  Reduced-Complexity Semidefinite Relaxations of Optimal Power Flow Problems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  K. Fujisawa,et al.  Semidefinite programming for optimal power flow problems , 2008 .

[9]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Polynomial SDP cuts for Optimal Power Flow , 2015, 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[10]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow—Part I: Formulations and Equivalence , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[11]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Positive definite completions of partial Hermitian matrices , 1984 .

[13]  Samuel Burer,et al.  Computable representations for convex hulls of low-dimensional quadratic forms , 2010, Math. Program..

[14]  Kurt M. Anstreicher,et al.  Institute for Mathematical Physics Semidefinite Programming versus the Reformulation–linearization Technique for Nonconvex Quadratically Constrained Quadratic Programming Semidefinite Programming versus the Reformulation-linearization Technique for Nonconvex Quadratically Constrained , 2022 .

[15]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Strengthening the SDP Relaxation of AC Power Flows With Convex Envelopes, Bound Tightening, and Valid Inequalities , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Daniel K. Molzahn,et al.  Moment/Sum-of-Squares Hierarchy for Complex Polynomial Optimization , 2015, 1508.02068.

[17]  R. Jabr Exploiting Sparsity in SDP Relaxations of the OPF Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  S. Low,et al.  Zero Duality Gap in Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Steven H. Low,et al.  Convex Relaxation of Optimal Power Flow—Part II: Exactness , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[20]  Steffen Rebennack,et al.  Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey I , 2012, Energy Systems.

[21]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Graph Implementations for Nonsmooth Convex Programs , 2008, Recent Advances in Learning and Control.

[22]  Alper Atamtürk,et al.  A spatial branch-and-cut method for nonconvex QCQP with bounded complex variables , 2016, Math. Program..

[23]  Santanu S. Dey,et al.  Strong SOCP Relaxations for the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2015, Oper. Res..

[24]  Gregor Verbic,et al.  Tight LP approximations for the optimal power flow problem , 2016, 2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[25]  M. B. Cain,et al.  History of Optimal Power Flow and Formulations , 2012 .

[26]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[27]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  AC-Feasibility on Tree Networks is NP-Hard , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  R. Jabr Radial distribution load flow using conic programming , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[29]  Abhinav Verma,et al.  Power grid security analysis: an optimization approach , 2010 .

[30]  Jean Maeght,et al.  AC Power Flow Data in MATPOWER and QCQP Format: iTesla, RTE Snapshots, and PEGASE , 2016, 1603.01533.

[31]  Thomas J. Overbye,et al.  Grid Structural Characteristics as Validation Criteria for Synthetic Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[32]  Garth P. McCormick,et al.  Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs: Part I — Convex underestimating problems , 1976, Math. Program..

[33]  C. Helmberg Semidefinite Programming for Combinatorial Optimization , 2000 .

[34]  Kazuo Murota,et al.  Exploiting Sparsity in Semidefinite Programming via Matrix Completion I: General Framework , 2000, SIAM J. Optim..

[35]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Convex quadratic relaxations for mixed-integer nonlinear programs in power systems , 2016, Mathematical Programming Computation.