Smart, texture‐sensitive instrument classification for in situ rock and layer analysis

[1] Science missions have limited lifetimes, necessitating an efficient investigation of the field site. The efficiency of onboard cameras, critical for planning, is limited by the need to downlink images to Earth for every decision. Recent advances have enabled rovers to take follow-up actions without waiting hours or days for new instructions. We propose using built-in processing by the instrument itself for adaptive data collection, faster reconnaissance, and increased mission science yield. We have developed a machine learning pixel classifier that is sensitive to texture differences in surface materials, enabling more sophisticated onboard classification than was previously possible. This classifier can be implemented in a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) for maximal efficiency and minimal impact on the rest of the system's functions. In this paper, we report on initial results from applying the texture-sensitive classifier to three example analysis tasks using data from the Mars Exploration Rovers.

[1]  Tara A. Estlin,et al.  AEGIS Automated Science Targeting for the MER Opportunity Rover , 2012, TIST.

[2]  Trent M. Hare,et al.  Topography and geomorphology of the Huygens landing site on Titan , 2007 .

[3]  James B. Garvin,et al.  Venus - The nature of the surface from Venera panoramas , 1984 .

[4]  Daniel M. Tartakovsky,et al.  Delineation of geologic facies with statistical learning theory , 2004 .

[5]  Tara A. Estlin,et al.  Oasis: Onboard autonomous science investigation system for opportunistic rover science , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[6]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site , 1986 .

[7]  David R. Thompson,et al.  Autonomous science during large‐scale robotic survey , 2011, J. Field Robotics.

[8]  R. E. Arvidson,et al.  Supporting Online Material , 2003 .

[9]  David R. Thompson,et al.  AEGIS automated targeting for MER opportunity rover , 2012 .

[10]  E. Mjolsness,et al.  Strategies for autonomous rovers at Mars , 2000 .

[11]  A. F. C. Haldemann,et al.  Assessment of Mars Exploration Rover landing site predictions , 2005, Nature.

[12]  Richard J. Greenberg,et al.  Astypalaea Linea: A Large-Scale Strike-Slip Fault on Europa , 1999 .

[13]  Nicolas Thomas,et al.  Distribution of Mid-Latitude Ground Ice on Mars from New Impact Craters , 2009, Science.

[14]  G. Neukum,et al.  Cassini Observes the Active South Pole of Enceladus , 2006, Science.

[15]  Mark A. Ruzon,et al.  Autonomous image analyses during the 1999 Marsokhod rover field test , 2001 .

[16]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  Semantic texton forests for image categorization and segmentation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Nathalie A. Cabrol,et al.  Life in the Atacama: Science autonomy for improving data quality , 2007 .

[18]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[19]  Xiaojin Gong,et al.  Rock detection via superpixel graph cuts , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.