Effect of Inorganic Nutrients on Relative Contributions of Fungi and Bacteria to Carbon Flow from Submerged Decomposing Leaf Litter

The relative contributions of fungi and bacteria to carbon flow from submerged decaying plant litter at different levels of inorganic nutrients (N and P) were studied. We estimated leaf mass loss, fungal and bacterial biomass and production, and microbial respiration and constructed partial carbon budgets for red maple leaf disks precolonized in a stream and then incubated in laboratory microcosms at two levels of nutrients. Patterns of carbon flow for leaf disks colonized with the full microbial assemblage were compared with those colonized by bacteria but in which fungi were greatly reduced by placing leaf disks in colonization chambers sealed with membrane filters to exclude aquatic hyphomycete conidia but not bacterial cells. On leaves colonized by the full microbial assemblage, elevated nutrient concentrations stimulated fungi and bacteria to a similar degree. Peak fungal and bacterial biomass increased by factors of 3.9 and 4.0; cumulative production was 3.9 and 5.1 times higher in the high nutrient in comparison with the low nutrient treatment, respectively. Fungi dominated the total microbial biomass (98.4 to 99.8%) and cumulative production (97.3 and 96.5%), and the fungal yield coefficient exceeded that of bacteria by a factor of 36 and 27 in low- and high-nutrient treatments, respectively. Consequently, the dominant role of fungi in leaf decomposition did not change as a result of nutrient manipulation. Carbon budgets indicated that 8% of leaf carbon loss in the low-nutrient treatment and 17% in the high-nutrient treatment were channeled to microbial (essentially fungal) production. Nutrient enrichment had a positive effect on rate of leaf decomposition only in microcosms with full microbial assemblages. In treatments where fungal colonization was reduced, cumulative bacterial production did not change significantly at either nutrient level and leaf decomposition rate was negatively affected (high nutrients), suggesting that bacterial participation in carbon flow from decaying leaf litter is low regardless of the presence of fungi and nutrient availability. Moreover, 1.5 and 2.3 times higher yield coefficients of bacteria in the reduced fungal treatments at low and high nutrients, respectively (percentage of leaf carbon loss channeled to bacterial production), suggest that bacteria are subjected to strong competition with fungi for resources available in leaf litter.

[1]  C. Shearer.  The Role of Woody Debris , 1992 .

[2]  G. Minshall,et al.  Effects of nutrient enrichment and leaf quality on the breakdown of leaves in a hardwater stream , 2001 .

[3]  S. Fisher,et al.  Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics during leaf decay in nutrient‐enriched stream microecosystems , 1976 .

[4]  D. Wicklow,et al.  The fungal community : its organization and role in the ecosystem , 1995 .

[5]  V. Gulis,et al.  Interactions between stream fungi and bacteria associated with decomposing leaf litter at different levels of nutrient availability , 2003 .

[6]  A. Chamier,et al.  Pectinases in Leaf Degradation by Aquatic Hyphomycetes: the Enzymes and Leaf Maceration , 1982 .

[7]  K. Sridhar,et al.  Initial Colonization, Nutrient Supply, and Fungal Activity on Leaves Decaying in Streams , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[8]  T. J. Breen,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (2nd ed.). , 1986 .

[9]  M. Gessner,et al.  Microbial dynamics associated with leaves decomposing in the mainstem and floodplain pond of a large river , 2002 .

[10]  V. Gulis,et al.  Leaf litter decomposition and microbial activity in nutrient‐enriched and unaltered reaches of a headwater stream , 2003 .

[11]  S. Hamilton,et al.  A Cross-System Comparison of Bacterial and Fungal Biomass in Detritus Pools of Headwater Streams , 2002, Microbial Ecology.

[12]  M. Pace,et al.  Regulation of Planktonic Microbial Communities by Nutrients and Herbivores , 1991 .

[13]  Keller Suberkropp,et al.  Interactions with invertebrates , 1992 .

[14]  M. Gessner,et al.  Nutrient addition accelerates leaf breakdown in an alpine springbrook , 2000, Oecologia.

[15]  S. Y. Newell,et al.  Fundamental Procedures for Determining Ergosterol Content of Decaying Plant Material by Liquid Chromatography , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[16]  M. Gessner,et al.  CONTRIBUTION OF STREAM DETRIVORES, FUNGI, AND BACTERIA TO LEAF BREAKDOWN BASED ON BIOMASS ESTIMATES , 2002 .

[17]  J. Meyer,et al.  Landscape variation in phosphorus concentration and effects on detritus‐based tropical streams , 2002 .

[18]  K. Suberkropp,et al.  Effects of nutrient enrichment on yellow poplar leaf decomposition and fungal activity in streams , 2001, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[19]  N. K. Kaushik,et al.  fate of the dead leaves that fall into streams , 1971 .

[20]  A. Chamier,et al.  Pectinases in leaf degradation by aquatic hyphomycetes I: the field study , 2004, Oecologia.

[21]  G A McFeters,et al.  Survival of coliform bacteria in natural waters: field and laboratory studies with membrane-filter chambers. , 1972, Applied microbiology.

[22]  J. Newbold,et al.  Continuous ammonium enrichment of a woodland stream: uptake kinetics, leaf decomposition, and nitrification , 1983 .

[23]  Felix Bärlocher,et al.  Effects of leaf size and decay rate on colonization by aquatic hyphomycetes , 1983 .

[24]  S. Findlay,et al.  Microbial growth and detritus transformations during decomposition of leaf litter in a stream , 1989 .

[25]  M. Gessner,et al.  Towards a budget of leaf litter decomposition in a first-order woodland stream , 1997 .

[26]  T. Cuffney,et al.  Experimental evidence quantifying the role of benthic invertebrates in organic matter dynamics of headwater streams , 1990 .

[27]  K. Suberkropp.  Relationships between growth and sporulation of aquatic hyphomycetes on decomposing leaf litter , 1991 .

[28]  K. Suberkropp.  The influence of nutrients on fungal growth, productivity, and sporulation during leaf breakdown in streams , 1995 .

[29]  F. Azam,et al.  Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria , 1989 .

[30]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Microbial production, enzyme activity, and carbon turnover in surface sediments of the Hudson River estuary , 1995, Microbial Ecology.

[31]  M. Gessner,et al.  Ergosterol-to-Biomass Conversion Factors for Aquatic Hyphomycetes , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[32]  A. Chamier.  Cell‐wall‐degrading enzymes of aquatic hyphomycetes: a review , 1985 .

[33]  K. Suberkropp,et al.  Fungal and Bacterial Production during the Breakdown of Yellow Poplar Leaves in 2 Streams , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[34]  K. Suberkropp,et al.  Application of fungal and bacterial production methodologies to decomposing leaves in streams , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[35]  É. Chauvet,et al.  Temperature and Sporulation of Aquatic Hyphomycetes , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[36]  M. Gessner,et al.  Bacteria, fungi and the breakdown of leaf litter in a large river , 1995 .

[37]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[38]  M. Klug,et al.  The maceration of deciduous leaf litter by aquatic hyphomycetes , 1980 .

[39]  K. Suberkropp.  Effect of dissolved nutrients on two aquatic hyphomycetes growing on leaf litter , 1998 .

[40]  J. Newbold,et al.  The Limiting Role of Phosphorus in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: Effects of P Enrichment on Leaf Decomposition and Primary Producers , 1981 .

[41]  D. Caron,et al.  Seasonal variation of phosphorus limitation of bacterial growth in a small lake , 2001 .