Determining Factors in Innovation of Small Firm Networks: A case of Cross Industry Groups in Japan

We examine the relationship between network characteristics and innovation under different phases of innovation. Based on micro data of cross industry groups, small firm networks for knowledge sharing and R&D cooperation, we show that close-knit networks, represented as dense communication and a high level of commitment among members, are correlated with initiating joint product development. Furthermore, the results show that establishing contact with external sources of knowledge such as public research institutes is important to achieve technical success in innovation. Lastly, engaging in cooperative activities in sales is correlated with commercial success in innovation.

[1]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm , 1998 .

[2]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[3]  Hiro Izushi.  Impact of the length of relationships upon the use of research institutes by SMEs , 2003 .

[4]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  The Firm as an Incentive System , 1994 .

[5]  Enrico Santarelli,et al.  From Which Source Do Small Firms Derive Their Innovative Inputs? Some Evidence from Italian Industry , 1997 .

[6]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[7]  HA Henny Romijn,et al.  Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England , 2002 .

[8]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Julie M. Hite,et al.  The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm , 2001 .

[10]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[12]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[14]  Bernard Yeung,et al.  An empirical investigation of joint venture dynamics: Evidence from U.S.-Japan joint ventures , 1996 .

[15]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  Measuring the impact of US research consortia , 2003 .

[16]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Richard M. Ennis.  Structure and Competition , 1998 .

[18]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[19]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organization. , 1994 .

[20]  K. Mark Weaver,et al.  Outcome quality of small- to medium- sized enterprise-based alliances: The role of perceived partner behaviors , 1998 .

[21]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Why Do Some Strategic Alliances Persist beyond Their Useful Life? , 2001 .

[22]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[23]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  When Do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data , 2000 .

[24]  B. A. Farbey,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs , 1966 .

[25]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  The Stability of American Markets , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[27]  James William Coleman,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society: Reply to Braithwaite , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[29]  Helge Godoe.  Innovation regimes, R&D and radical innovations in telecommunications , 2000 .

[30]  Pamela C. Smith.  An Empirical Investigation of Joint Ventures Between For-Profit and Tax-Exempt Nonprofit Hospitals , 2001 .

[31]  Hiroyuki Okamuro.  Determinants of Successful R & D Cooperation of the Japanese Small Business : Impact of Organizational and Contractual Characteristics , 2004 .

[32]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and recipient firm size , 1994 .

[33]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[34]  W. Hulsink,et al.  Networks in Entrepreneurship: The Case of High-technology Firms , 2001 .

[35]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[36]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[37]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  High Tech R&D Subsidies: Estimating the Effects of Sematech , 1994 .

[38]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[39]  Mariko Sakakibara,et al.  HETEROGENEITY OF FIRM CAPABILITIES AND COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF MOTIVES , 1997 .

[40]  A. Portes,et al.  Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  M. Ruef,et al.  Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation , 2002 .

[42]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[43]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  Norman,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. , 1966 .

[45]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[46]  Scott Shane,et al.  Network Ties, Reputation, and the Financing of New Ventures , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[47]  Mariko Sakakibara.  The Diversity of R&D Consortia and Firm Behavior: Evidence from Japanese Data , 2003 .

[48]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[49]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D , 1990, Small Business Economics.

[50]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Firms size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy , 1996 .

[51]  Hiroyuki Okamuro.  Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: The impact of organizational and contractual characteristics , 2007 .