Energy Objectives for the United States Department of Defense

Abstract : The United States Department of Defense (DoD) has identified energy as a key vulnerability and has made substantial moves to improve its energy profile in the last decade, including establishing a new Assistant Secretary of Defense position for Operational Energy Plans and Programs and integrating energy considerations into its large and complex acquisition process. As part of this process, each military service and the DoD as a whole have issued documents outlining strategic goals and objectives relative to energy. In addition, the Congress and both the Bush and Obama administrations have issued relevant strategic guidance. The strategic guidance conveys the importance and urgency of changing DoD s energy profile. The documents specify a wide range of objectives, which only partially overlap. Moreover, although some terms (e.g., energy security) occur frequently, they are defined in many distinct ways. This points to a need for specific efforts to operationalize the strategic guidance so that DoD decision makers at all levels can implement it effectively. In this report, we analyze strategy and policy documents from DoD and related organizations, in order to determine an appropriate framework of objectives for energy decisions. We identify and explicitly define a comprehensive set of common objectives and note the language in each document that expresses the pursuit of each objective. This set of objectives and associated definitions clarifies relationships among the strategic documents, and is intended to help communication horizontally (e.g., across services) and vertically, across hierarchical levels. In addition, the objectives we define suggest possible metrics that may be measurable and comparable across services, and may be possible to aggregate across organizational levels.

[1]  Gregory J Lengyel Department of Defense Energy Strategy. Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks (Walker Paper, Number 10) , 2008 .

[2]  Robert F. Bordley,et al.  Multiattribute Preference Analysis with Performance Targets , 2004, Oper. Res..

[3]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  A Multiple-Objective Decision Analysis of Stakeholder Values to Identify Watershed Improvement Needs , 2005, Decis. Anal..

[4]  Patrick J Sweeney,et al.  The Proposed Change Strategy to Embed Energy Stewardship into the Army's Culture , 2012 .

[5]  swright National Security Strategy , 2015 .

[6]  Alvin L. Alm,et al.  More Capable Warfighting Through Reduced Fuel Burden , 1998 .

[7]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[8]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Common Mistakes in Making Value Trade-Offs , 2002, Oper. Res..

[9]  Bruce R. Pirnie,et al.  An Objectives-Based Approach to Military Campaign Analysis , 1996 .

[10]  Ronald O'Rourke,et al.  Department of Defense Energy Initiatives: Background and Issues for Congress , 2012 .

[11]  Measuring Military Capability , .

[12]  Thomas D Crowley,et al.  Transforming the Way DOD Looks at Energy. An Approach to Establishing an Energy Strategy , 2007 .

[13]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Advances in Decision Analysis: Developing Objectives and Attributes , 2007 .

[14]  James L. Corner,et al.  Perspective on Decision Analysis Applications, 1990 - 2001 , 2004, Decis. Anal..

[15]  Jerry M. Sollinger,et al.  Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age: Analyst's Handbook , 2000 .

[16]  th Congress,et al.  National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 , 1999 .

[17]  Salvador Trinxet National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 , 2014 .