Variation in complex olfactory stimuli and its influence on odour recognition

Natural olfactory stimuli are often complex and highly variable. The olfactory systems of animals are likely to have evolved to use specific features of olfactory stimuli for identification and discrimination. Here, we train honeybees to learn chemically defined odorant mixtures that systematically vary from trial to trial and then examine how they generalize to each odorant present in the mixture. An odorant that was present at a constant concentration in a mixture becomes more representative of the mixture than other variable odorants. We also show that both variation and intensity of a complex olfactory stimulus affect the rate of generalization by honeybees to subsequent olfactory stimuli. These results have implications for the way that all animals perceive and attend to features of olfactory stimuli.

[1]  B. Smith,et al.  Different thresholds for detection and discrimination of odors in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). , 2004, Chemical senses.

[2]  T. A. Cleland,et al.  Intensity modulation of olfactory acuity. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  C. Linster,et al.  Configurational and nonconfigurational interactions between odorants in binary mixtures. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[4]  Nathaniel N. Urban,et al.  Lateral inhibition in the olfactory bulb and in olfaction , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[5]  M. Mizunami,et al.  Olfactory discrimination of structurally similar alcohols by cockroaches , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  Gilles Laurent,et al.  Olfactory network dynamics and the coding of multidimensional signals , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Eran Pichersky,et al.  The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defense. , 2002, Current opinion in plant biology.

[8]  J. Pearce.  Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning , 2002, Animal learning & behavior.

[9]  C. Linster,et al.  Intramodal blocking between olfactory stimuli in rats , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[10]  R. Raguso,et al.  Fragrance chemistry and pollinator affinities in Nyctaginaceae. , 2001, Phytochemistry.

[11]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code , 2001, Nature.

[12]  J. Devaud,et al.  Odor Exposure Causes Central Adaptation and Morphological Changes in Selected Olfactory Glomeruli in Drosophila , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  W. Cain,et al.  Psychometrics of odor quality discrimination: method for threshold determination. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[14]  B. H. Smith,et al.  Blocking and the detection of odor components in blends. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  W. Cain,et al.  Quantification of odor quality. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[16]  K. Daly,et al.  Associative olfactory learning in the moth Manduca sexta. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[17]  R. Menzel,et al.  Olfactory discrimination ability and odor structure-activity relationships in honeybees. , 1999, Chemical senses.

[18]  S. Chandra,et al.  An analysis of synthetic processing of odor mixtures in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  B. Smith.  Analysis of Interaction in Binary Odorant Mixtures , 1998, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  G. Laurent,et al.  Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies , 1997, Nature.

[21]  B. Smith,et al.  A computational model of the response of honey bee antennal lobe circuitry to odor mixtures: overshadowing, blocking and unblocking can arise from lateral inhibition , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  M. Laska,et al.  Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and humans. , 1997, Chemical senses.

[23]  R. Menzel,et al.  Odorant intensity as a determinant for olfactory conditioning in honeybees: roles in discrimination, overshadowing and memory consolidation. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[24]  B. Smith,et al.  Olfactory conditioning in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: Effects of odor intensity , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[25]  J. Knudsen,et al.  Floral scents-a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques , 1993 .

[26]  M. Laska,et al.  Ability to discriminate between related odor mixtures , 1992 .

[27]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[28]  R. Mair.  Adaptation of rat olfactory bulb neurones. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  Stephan L. Chorover,et al.  Response plasticity in hamster olfactory bulb: peripheral and central processes , 1976, Brain Research.

[30]  S. Bhatia.  Conditioned Reflexes , 1938, The Indian medical gazette.

[31]  M. B. Wiley,et al.  The relationship between mean and instantaneous structure in turbulent passive scalar plumes , 2002 .

[32]  J. Pearce.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model. , 1994, Psychological review.

[33]  H. E. Dobson,et al.  Floral volatiles in insect biology , 1994 .

[34]  A. Agresti.  An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[35]  Paul Laffort,et al.  Effect of the concentration and nature of olfactory stimuli on the proboscis extension of conditioned honey bees Apis mellifica ligustica , 1989 .

[36]  R. Rescorla.  Behavioral studies of Pavlovian conditioning. , 1988, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  P. Holland,et al.  Behavioral Studies of Associative Learning in Animals , 1982 .