Identifying Opportunities for Valuable Encounters: Toward Context-Aware Social Matching Systems

Mobile social matching systems have the potential to transform the way we make new social ties, but only if we are able to overcome the many challenges that exist as to how systems can utilize contextual data to recommend interesting and relevant people to users and facilitate valuable encounters between strangers. This article outlines how context and mobility influence people's motivations to meet new people and presents innovative design concepts for mediating mobile encounters through context-aware social matching systems. Findings from two studies are presented. The first, a survey study (n = 117) explored the concept of contextual rarity of shared user attributes as a measure to improve desirability in mobile social matches. The second, an interview study (n = 58) explored people's motivations to meet others in various contexts. From these studies we derived a set of novel context-aware social matching concepts, including contextual sociability and familiarity as an indicator of opportune social context; contextual engagement as an indicator of opportune personal context; and contextual rarity, oddity, and activity partnering as an indicator of opportune relational context. The findings of these studies establish the importance of different contextual factors and frame the design space of context-aware social matching systems.

[1]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[2]  Rebeca P. Díaz Redondo,et al.  Recommender Systems for the Social Web , 2012, Recommender Systems for the Social Web.

[3]  John Riedl,et al.  GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews , 1994, CSCW '94.

[4]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1989, Theoretical Sociology.

[5]  Albert Bandura,et al.  The Psychology of Chance Encounters and Life Paths , 1982 .

[6]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[7]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[8]  Sophie Ahrens,et al.  Recommender Systems , 2012 .

[9]  Michael Roberts,et al.  Activity-based serendipitous recommendations with the Magitti mobile leisure guide , 2008, CHI.

[10]  R. Sykes.  INITIAL INTERACTION BETWEEN STRANGERS AND ACQUAINTANCES A Multivariate Analysis of Factors Affecting Choice of Communication Partners , 1983 .

[11]  L. Festinger.  Social pressures in informal groups : a study of human factors in housing / by Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter and Kurt Back , 1950 .

[12]  Jacquie D. Vorauer,et al.  Who's Going to Make the First Move? Pluralistic Ignorance as an Impediment to Relationship Formation , 1996 .

[13]  Darren Leigh,et al.  Social net: using patterns of physical proximity over time to infer shared interests , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  L. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 1962 .

[15]  Joyce Ho,et al.  Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices , 2005, CHI.

[16]  Yasuyuki Sumi,et al.  C-MAP: Building a Context-Aware Mobile Assistant for Exhibition Tours , 1998, Community Computing and Support Systems.

[17]  Michael Sunnafrank.  Predicted Outcome Value During Initial Interactions A Reformulation of Uncertainty Reduction Theory , 1986 .

[18]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management , 2008, TCHI.

[19]  Sukeshini A. Grandhi,et al.  Sharing the big apple: a survey study of people, place and locatability , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[20]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  Putting systems into place: a qualitative study of design requirements for location-aware community systems , 2004, CSCW.

[21]  Xingshe Zhou,et al.  Supporting Context-Aware Media Recommendations for Smart Phones , 2006, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[22]  J R Eiser,et al.  Adolescent health behaviour and similarity-attraction: friends share smoking habits (really), but much else besides. , 1991, The British journal of social psychology.

[23]  F. Zijlstra,et al.  Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities , 1999 .

[24]  Marian M. Morry,et al.  The attraction–similarity model and dating couples: Projection, perceived similarity, and psychological benefits , 2011 .

[25]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[26]  Per Persson,et al.  Nokia sensor: from research to product , 2005, DUX '05.

[27]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Social serendipity: mobilizing social software , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[28]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Context-aware recommender systems , 2008, RecSys '08.

[29]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Predicting user interests from contextual information , 2009, SIGIR.

[30]  Sukeshini A. Grandhi,et al.  Hello Stranger! A Study of Introductory Communication Structure and Social Match Success , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[31]  Bart Selman,et al.  Referral Web: combining social networks and collaborative filtering , 1997, CACM.

[32]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Collaborative filtering via gaussian probabilistic latent semantic analysis , 2003, SIGIR.

[33]  Paul C. Castro,et al.  Building Context-Aware Applications with Context Weaver , 2004 .

[34]  Andy Hopper,et al.  The active badge location system , 1992, TOIS.

[35]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[36]  Rathindra Sarathy,et al.  Understanding Situational Online Information Disclosure as a Privacy Calculus , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[37]  L. Verbrugge.  The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices , 1977 .

[38]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[39]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Understanding and Using Context , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[40]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Experiences of developing and deploying a context-aware tourist guide: the GUIDE project , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[41]  Charles R. Berger,et al.  Plans and the Initiation of Social Relationships , 1988 .

[42]  Jin H. Im,et al.  Privacy , 2002, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.

[43]  Sukeshini A. Grandhi,et al.  Technology-mediated interruption management , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[44]  Tao Li,et al.  MEET: a generalized framework for reciprocal recommender systems , 2012, CIKM.

[45]  Georg Groh,et al.  Social Recommender Systems , 2012, Recommender Systems for the Social Web.

[46]  Donn Byrne,et al.  Behavioral Indicators of Interpersonal Attraction1 , 1971 .

[47]  F. Moghaddam,et al.  Similarity and attraction among majority and minority groups in a multicultural context , 1997 .

[48]  S. Milgram,et al.  The Individual In A Social World: Essays and Experiments , 1992 .

[49]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  The prediction of interpersonal attraction , 1956 .

[50]  Cristian Borcea,et al.  GDC: Group Discovery Using Co-location Traces , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[51]  Panagiotis Symeonidis,et al.  Feature-Weighted User Model for Recommender Systems , 2007, User Modeling.

[52]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..

[53]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[54]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness , 1999, HUC.

[55]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Attitude and activity preference similarity: Differential bases of interpersonal attraction for low and high self-monitors. , 1987 .

[56]  Bill N. Schilit,et al.  Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts , 1994, IEEE Network.

[57]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Similarity of Activity Preferences among Friends: Those Who Play Together Stay Together. , 1979 .

[58]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Interpersonal attraction as a function of social interaction. , 1977 .

[59]  Lise Getoor,et al.  Using Probabilistic Relational Models for Collaborative Filtering , 1999 .

[60]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Location-Based Services for Mobile Telephony: a Study of Users' Privacy Concerns , 2003, INTERACT.

[61]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study , 2003, CHI '03.

[62]  R. Levine,et al.  The Kindness of Strangers People's willingness to help someone during a chance encounter on a city street varies considerably around the world , 2016 .

[63]  Kara A. Latorella,et al.  The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in Human-Computer Interaction Design , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[64]  Douglas B. Terry,et al.  Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry , 1992, CACM.

[65]  D. Byrne,et al.  ATTRACTION AS A LINEAR FUNCTION OF PROPORTION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTS. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  Greg Linden,et al.  Amazon . com Recommendations Item-to-Item Collaborative Filtering , 2001 .

[67]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Social matching: A framework and research agenda , 2005, TCHI.

[68]  Susan B. Shimanoff.  Communication Rules: Theory and Research , 1980 .

[69]  Richard P. Schuler,et al.  Towards an understanding of social inference opportunities in social computing , 2012, GROUP.

[70]  David Heckerman,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering , 1998, UAI.

[71]  F. Allport,et al.  Students' attitudes; a report of the Syracuse University reaction study. , 1931 .

[72]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Make new friends, but keep the old: recommending people on social networking sites , 2009, CHI.

[73]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[74]  Eric Paulos,et al.  The familiar stranger: anxiety, comfort, and play in public places , 2004, CHI.

[75]  Richard P. Schuler,et al.  Common attributes in an unusual context: predicting the desirability of a social match , 2010, RecSys '10.

[76]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Cyberguide: A mobile context‐aware tour guide , 1997, Wirel. Networks.

[77]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The Experience Sampling Method , 2014 .

[78]  L. Perlow.  The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time , 1999 .

[79]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  R. Horton,et al.  Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity , 2008 .

[81]  John Kelley,et al.  WhozThat? evolving an ecosystem for context-aware mobile social networks , 2008, IEEE Network.

[82]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design , 1994, CSCW '94.

[83]  E. Goffman.  Behavior in Public Places , 1963 .

[84]  Martha Larson,et al.  Mining mood-specific movie similarity with matrix factorization for context-aware recommendation , 2010 .

[85]  Ioannis Konstas,et al.  On social networks and collaborative recommendation , 2009, SIGIR.

[86]  Chris Schmandt,et al.  Giving the caller the finger: collaborative responsibility for cellphone interruptions , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[87]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[88]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[89]  Markus Endler,et al.  Defining Situated Social Context for pervasive social computing , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops).

[90]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[91]  Pasquale Lops,et al.  Content-based Recommender Systems: State of the Art and Trends , 2011, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[92]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[93]  Sihem Amer-Yahia,et al.  Relevance and ranking in online dating systems , 2010, SIGIR.

[94]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation , 1997, CACM.

[95]  Judy Kay,et al.  RECON: a reciprocal recommender for online dating , 2010, RecSys '10.

[96]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Understanding inverse document frequency: on theoretical arguments for IDF , 2004, J. Documentation.

[97]  Terry C. Blum,et al.  HETEROGENEITY AND INTERMARRIAGE , 1982 .

[98]  Deborah Davis,et al.  Implications for interaction versus effectance as mediators of the similarity-attraction relationship , 1981 .