Anatomy of Knowledge Bases Used in Design Science Research - A Literature Review

Several papers have addressed the theory foundation of DSR. While researchers usually emphasize that the existence of such a knowledge base (KB) is essential for high quality design science research (DSR), opinions depart what kind of knowledge comprises such a knowledge base and which qualitative requirements apply regarding the knowledge leveraged. Some researchers demand that DSR is based on descriptive formal theories, while other scholars extend the width of the knowledge base also to unverified empirical evidence, conceptual knowledge and prescriptive knowledge. In order to provide some guidance for practical DSR, we apply literature review methodology on recent DSR articles to determine the common practice regarding the use and development of knowledge bases in previous projects. Based on this investigation, we discuss current issues, derive implications for future research and suggest measures to strengthen the role of the knowledge base in DSR.

[1]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project , 2008 .

[2]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[3]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[4]  Raymond Y. K. Lau,et al.  Automatic Domain Ontology Extraction for Context-Sensitive Opinion Mining , 2009, ICIS.

[5]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Designing enterprise integration solutions: effectively , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Paul Golding,et al.  A Design Science Approach for Creating Mobile Applications , 2009, ICIS.

[7]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[8]  Gerold Riempp,et al.  Towards a Strategic Positioning Method for IT Management , 2009, ICIS.

[9]  Markus Nüttgens,et al.  Web 2.0 in SME Networks - A Design Science Approach Considering Multi-perspective Requirements , 2009, AMCIS/SIGeBIZ.

[10]  Stefan Seidel,et al.  Toward Process Modeling in Creative Domains , 2009, AMCIS.

[11]  J. Aken.  Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management , 2005 .

[12]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Value Creation in E-Business Management. 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2009, SIGeBIZ track, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 6-9, 2009. Selected Papers , 2009, AMCIS/SIGeBIZ.

[13]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Formalizing Theory Development in IS Design Science Research: Learning from Qualitative Research , 2009, AMCIS.

[14]  David P. Hale,et al.  Towards a Reference Architecture of Intent for Information Systems Strategic Alignment , 2008, AMCIS.

[15]  Douglas A. Druckenmiller,et al.  Engineering Dialectical Inquiry: Lessons Learned from Lab Explorations , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[17]  Thomas A. Horan,et al.  Process Improvement and Consumer-Oriented Design of an Inter-Organizational Information System for Emergency Medical Response , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Walter Brenner,et al.  Service Consumer Model: Understanding and Describing Consumers for New Service Development , 2008, AMCIS.

[19]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  What design science is not , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Karen Vizecky,et al.  A Design Theory for Knowledge Transfer in Business Intelligence , 2011, AMCIS.

[21]  Lakshmi S. Iyer,et al.  Secure activity resource coordination: empirical evidence of enhanced security awareness in designing secure business processes , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Jens Vykoukal,et al.  Portfolio Performance Measurement Based on Service-Oriented Grid Computing: Developing a Prototype from a Design Science Perspective , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Jue Xie,et al.  Sustaining Quality Assessment Processes in User-Centred Health Information Portals , 2009, AMCIS.

[24]  Lawrence A. Machi,et al.  The literature review : six steps to success , 2009 .

[25]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  A Deontological Approach to Designing Ethical Collaboration , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[27]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Jiexun Li,et al.  Complex Problem Solving: Identity Matching Based on Social Contextual Information , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  Design of emerging digital services: a taxonomy , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[31]  Katarina Stanoevska-Slabeva,et al.  Generic Business Model Types for Enterprise Mashup Intermediaries , 2009, AMCIS/SIGeBIZ.

[32]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  Taxonomy development in information systems: Developing a taxonomy of mobile applications , 2009, ECIS.

[33]  Tzu-Liang Tseng,et al.  Extracting Business Intelligence from Online Product Reviews: An Experiment of Automatic Rule-Induction , 2010, ICIS.

[34]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Developing a Business Process Modeling Language for the Banking Sector - A Design Science Approach , 2009, AMCIS.

[36]  Daniel D. Mittleman.  Planning and Design Considerations for Computer Supported Collaboration Spaces , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Martin Böhringer,et al.  Towards a design theory for applying web 2.0 patterns to organisations , 2011, ECIS.

[38]  Maria L. Gini,et al.  Flexible decision support in dynamic interorganizational networks ∗ , 2009 .

[39]  Xiaojun Zhang,et al.  Designing Collaborative Systems to Enhance Team Performance , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Katja Thoring,et al.  Understanding Artifact Knowledge in Design Science: Prototypes and Products as Knowledge Repositories , 2011, AMCIS.

[41]  Florian Matthes,et al.  Utilizing Patterns in Developing Design Theories , 2010, ICIS.

[42]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  A Design Theory for Secure Information Systems Design Methods , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Alok Gupta,et al.  GIST: A Model for Design and Management of Content and Interactivity of Customer-Centric Web Sites , 2004, MIS Q..

[44]  Bernd Heinrich,et al.  Automated Planning of Process Models: The Constructions of Exclusive Choices , 2009, ICIS.

[45]  Alexander Maedche,et al.  Enabling End-user-driven Data Interoperability - A Design Science Research Project , 2011, AMCIS.

[46]  Raymond Y. K. Lau,et al.  Leveraging the web context for context-sensitive opinion mining , 2009, 2009 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology.

[47]  Nils Urbach,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) Summer 10-6-2011 DESIGNING A REFERENCE FRAMEWORK OF IT / IS OUTSOURCING STEERING PROCESSES , 2017 .

[48]  Sue S. Feldman,et al.  Development of a Disability Employment Information System: An Information Systems Design Theory Approach , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[49]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[50]  Peter Baloh,et al.  The Role of Fit in Knowledge Management Systems: Tentative Propositions of the KMS Design , 2007, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[51]  Gerold Riempp,et al.  Knowledge Centers in Professional Services Firms: Design and Empirical Evidence , 2010, AMCIS.

[52]  Matthias Boehm,et al.  An Integrated Approach for Teaching Professionals IT Management and IT Consulting , 2011, AMCIS.

[53]  Judith Weedman,et al.  Client as designer in collaborative design science research projects: what does social science design theory tell us? , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[55]  Estela Lizabeth Munoz Andrade,et al.  Enhanced Learning Using Mutimedia-Interactive Systems: An Experimental Study , 2009 .

[56]  George M. Kasper,et al.  A Theory of Decision Support System Design for User Calibration , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Ofer Arazy,et al.  A Theory-Driven Design Framework for Social Recommender Systems , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[59]  Natalie M. Steiger,et al.  Decision Support as Knowledge Creation: An Information System Design Theory , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[60]  Lakshmi S. Iyer,et al.  A Semantic Approach to Secure Collaborative Inter-Organizational eBusiness Processes (SSCIOBP) , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Tobias Conte,et al.  Towards Objectives-Based Process Redesign , 2010, AMCIS.

[62]  Rafael A. Gonzalez,et al.  Validation of Crisis Response Simulation within the Design Science Framework , 2009, ICIS.

[63]  Robert Wayne Gregory,et al.  Design Science Research and the Grounded Theory Method: Characteristics, Differences, and Complementary Uses , 2010, ECIS.

[64]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[65]  Julie Fisher,et al.  E-Commerce Research in Australia: Inviting a Comparative Analysis , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Information Systems Research Cycle , 2003, Computer.

[68]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[69]  Sven Weber.  Design Science Research: Paradigm or Approach? , 2010, AMCIS.

[70]  Christoph Rosenkranz,et al.  The role of boundary objects and boundary spanning in data warehousing - A research-in-progress report , 2009, ECIS.

[71]  Raymond Y. K. Lau,et al.  An Empirical Study of Online Consumer Review Spam: A Design Science Approach , 2010, ICIS.

[72]  Thomas A. Horan,et al.  Sharing behavior in emergencies: An instantiation of a utility-focused prototype of a secure mobile near-real-time content device in pre-hospital and hospital settings , 2010, AMCIS.

[73]  Susanne Strahringer,et al.  Rigorous Selection of Input Artifacts in Design Science Research - TAVIAS , 2010, AMCIS.

[74]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Preparing a Negotiated R&D Portfolio with a Prediction Market , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[75]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  Tinkering, Tailoring and Bricolage: Implications for Theories of Design , 2009, AMCIS.

[76]  Surendra Sarnikar,et al.  Towards a Design Theory for Process-Based Knowledge Management Systems , 2009, ICIS.

[77]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  An Information Systems Design Theory for Collaborative ePortfolio Systems , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[78]  Andrea Back,et al.  Towards a Maturity Model for E-Collaboration - A Design Science Research Approach , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[79]  Ivan Aaen,et al.  Essence: facilitating software innovation , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[80]  Ning Nan,et al.  Using Multi-Agent Simulation to Explore the Contribution of Facilitation to GSS Transition , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Felix Wortmann,et al.  Uncovering Four Strategies to Approach Master Data Management , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[82]  Benjamin Schooley,et al.  Development of a Disability Employment Information System: An Information Systems Design Theory Approach , 2012 .

[83]  Peter Rittgen,et al.  Collaborative Modeling - A Design Science Approach , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[84]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using A Positivist Case Research Methodology To Test Three Competing Theories-In-Use Of Business Process Redesign , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[85]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[86]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..