Developing Critical Implementations of Technology-Rich Innovations: A Cross-Case Study of the Implementation of Quest Atlantis

This study examined the tensions surrounding the implementation of a technology-rich educational innovation called Quest Atlantis (QA) in a local public elementary school. Three qualitative case studies of three classrooms implementing the innovation and a subsequent cross-case analysis were undertaken to illuminate: 1) the reasons why teachers chose to implement the innovation in their classrooms; 2) the core challenges and tensions of implementing this innovation; 3) the supports necessary to successfully implement the innovation; and 4) the adaptation that the innovation underwent in the course of its implementation. The results of this study indicated that teachers implemented QA because of its alignment with their existing curricular goals, its flexible adaptivity, and its emphasis on social commitments. Findings also indicated that teachers persisted in using QA because the students enjoyed it and were enthusiastic for its continued use. Core challenges and tensions in the implementation included security concerns related to QA's use of web-based communication features, providing appropriate technical and social support for implementation, and balancing the innovation's intended use and its actual use.

[1]  M. Cole.  Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[2]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[3]  Clifford Stoll,et al.  High-Tech Heretic: Reflections of a Computer Contrarian , 1999 .

[4]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[5]  M. Mclaughlin,et al.  Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. VIII: Implementing and Sustaining Innovations. , 1978 .

[6]  D. P. Crandall,et al.  The Teacher's Role in School Improvement. , 1983 .

[7]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Case Study Research in Education : A Qualitative Approach , 1991 .

[8]  Craig Locatis,et al.  Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology , 1994, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[9]  S. Barab,et al.  Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation , 2003 .

[10]  Glenda Mac Naughton.  Doing Foucault in Early Childhood Studies : Applying Post-Structural Ideas , 2005 .

[11]  K. Squire,et al.  Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .

[12]  R. Lewontin.  ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[13]  M. Mclaughlin.  The Rand Change Agent Study Revisited: Macro Perspectives and Micro Realities , 1990 .

[14]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Innovations in learning : new environments for education , 1996 .

[15]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[16]  David A. Erlandson.  Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods , 1993 .

[17]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Critical Design Ethnography: Designing for Change , 2004 .

[18]  Ronald K. Goodenow.  Book reviewTeachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920: Larry Cuban. Teachers College Press, 1986, 134pp. , 1988 .

[19]  Ernest R. House,et al.  Technology versus Craft: a Ten Year Perspective on Innovation , 1979 .

[20]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[21]  D. Schwartz,et al.  Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional design , 1999 .

[22]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Creating Scalable and Systemic Technology Innovations for Urban Education , 2001 .

[23]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. , 1996 .

[24]  R. Elmore.  Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice , 1996 .

[25]  P. Twining.  Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom , 2002 .

[26]  Michael Scriven,et al.  Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation , 2000 .

[27]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Online Learning: From Information Dissemination to Fostering Collaboration , 2001 .

[28]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-design Theories and Models : A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume II , 1999 .

[29]  Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[30]  L. Corno,et al.  Teachers as Innovators , 1997 .

[31]  M. Mclaughlin,et al.  Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change , 1975 .

[32]  R. Yin.  The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy , 1981 .

[33]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[34]  Jane M. Healy,et al.  Failure to Connect: How Computers Affect Our Children's Minds -- and What We Can Do About It , 1999 .

[35]  Steven M. Ross,et al.  Scaling Up School Restructuring in Multicultural, Multilingual Contexts , 1998 .

[36]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[37]  T. Guskey.  Staff Development and the Process of Teacher Change , 1986 .

[38]  M. Fullan,et al.  The Meaning of Educational Change , 1984 .

[39]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[40]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[41]  Allan Collins,et al.  Toward a Design Science of Education , 1992 .

[42]  L. Schauble,et al.  Design Experiments in Educational Research , 2003 .

[43]  M. Miles,et al.  Mustering the Will and Skill for Change. , 1990 .

[44]  G. Macnaughton.  Doing Foucault in Early Childhood Studies: Applying Post-Structural Ideas , 2005 .

[45]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[46]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture , 2003 .

[47]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[48]  Michael Fullan,et al.  Research on Curriculum and Instruction Implementation , 1977 .

[49]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation , 1983 .

[50]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating a Framework for Research on Systemic Technology Innovations , 2004 .

[51]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[52]  Hilary McLellan,et al.  Virtual realities , 2018, Fiction and the Languages of Law.

[53]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .