A Framework of Multi-Criteria Decision Making For Candidate Short Listing System

Recruitment and selection processes are an important task in human resource department. Recruitment process is the first step which determines the competitiveness of the company. Concerning to this issue, developing a framework for decision support system which implements multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is really needed. This research involved knowledge acquisition phase to capture the expert knowledge including collecting documents of current recruitment and selection processes, knowledge from the literature review and interviews with experts from various companies. The data collected are used to create a theoretical model for employee selection that represented by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The main objective of this research paper is to eliminate the degree of personal preference. The proposed framework integrates selection set test and AHP to shortlist the application which acts as an interface between the applicants and selection panel. AHP was used to develop a model which utilizes pair-wise comparison to identify the relative importance of each criteria used to evaluate candidates. Furthermore Simple Additive Weighting Model (SAW) was used to develop a score for each candidate according to their qualifications and the weight assigned by AHP. As a testing of the proposed framework, eliminate the need for manual labor by 85.7% and speed up time by 74.8%.

[1]  Fei Ma,et al.  Capability adaptation algorithm based on joint network and terminal selection in heterogeneous networks , 2011 .

[2]  Eleonora Bottani,et al.  An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection—An application oriented to lead-time reduction , 2008 .

[3]  Kazuhiko Ohe,et al.  Relationship between risk information on total colonoscopy and patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening options: Analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2008, BMC health services research.

[4]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Pablo Aragonés Beltrán,et al.  An AHP-based evaluation procedure for Innovative Educational Projects : A face-to-face vs. computer-mediated case study , 2008 .

[6]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process in Maintenance Problem , 2008, IEA/AIE.

[8]  James G. Dolan,et al.  Risk communication formats for low probability events: an exploratory study of patient preferences , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[9]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[10]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[11]  Alexander Setiawan,et al.  Application of Multi Criteria Decision Making for an Online Awardees Short Listing System , 2012 .

[12]  Cheng-Ru Wu,et al.  FAHP Sensitivity Analysis for Measurement Nonprofit Organizational Performance , 2008 .

[13]  A. Kaka,et al.  Culture change through the use of appropriate pricing systems , 2008 .

[14]  Müjde Erol Genevois,et al.  A Fuzzy Multiattribute Decision Making Model to Evaluate Human Resource Flexibility Problem , 2008, J. Multiple Valued Log. Soft Comput..