Interdisciplinary Data Driven Production Process Analysis for the Internet of Production

Abstract Recent developments in the industrial field are strongly influenced by requirements of the fourth industrial revolution (I4.0) for modern Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS) and the coherent phenomenon of industrial big data (IBD). I4.0 is characterized by a growing amount of interdisciplinary work and cross-domain exchange of methods and knowledge. Similar to the development of the Internet of Things (IoT) for the consumer market, the emergence of an Internet of Production (IoP) in the industrial field is imminent. The future vision for an IoP is based on aggregated, multi-perspective and persistent data sets that can be seamlessly and semantically integrated to allow diagnosis and prediction in domain-specific real-time. In this paper, we demonstrate an exemplary scenario of collaborative cross-domain work, in which domain-experts from largely different fields of expertise, i.e. heavy plate rolling (HPR), injection molding (IM) and machine learning (ML), generate insights through data driven process analysis in two use cases. Specifically, in the HPR use case, reinforcement-learning was utilized to support the planning phase of the process aiming to reduce manual work load and to ultimately generate process plans that serve as a foundation for a simulation to calculate process results. On the contrary, in the IM use case, supervised-learning was utilized to learn a complex and computationally demanding finite element simulation model in order to predict process results for unknown process configurations, which can be used to optimize the process planning phase. While both use cases had the overall goal to utilize ML to gain new insights about the respective process, the actual ML application was utilized with reversed purpose. Particularly, in the HPR use case, ML was used to learn the process planning in order to calculate process results while in the IM use case, ML was used to predict process results in order to improve the process planning. We facilitate the communication between physically separated domain experts and the exchange of gained insights in the respective use cases by a framework that addresses the specific needs of cross-domain collaboration. We show that the insights gained from two largely different use cases are valuable to the domain experts of the other respective use case, facilitating cross-domain data driven production process analysis for future IoP scenarios.

[1]  Jason Weston,et al.  A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning , 2008, ICML '08.

[2]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[3]  Klaus-Dieter Thoben,et al.  An approach to monitoring quality in manufacturing using supervised machine learning on product state data , 2013, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[4]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Deep learning in neural networks: An overview , 2014, Neural Networks.

[5]  László Monostori,et al.  AI and machine learning techniques for managing complexity, changes and uncertainties in manufacturing , 2003 .

[6]  Chong Wang,et al.  Simultaneous image classification and annotation , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  C. M. Sellars,et al.  Modelling Microstructure and Its Effects during Multipass Hot Rolling , 1992 .

[8]  Daniela M. Witten,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R , 2013 .

[9]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  A Review on Basic Data-Driven Approaches for Industrial Process Monitoring , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  Rainer Stark,et al.  Data Management in Collaborative Interdisciplinary Research Projects - Conclusions from the Digitalization of Research in Sustainable Manufacturing , 2016, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[11]  Katharina Morik,et al.  Quality Prediction in Interlinked Manufacturing Processes based on Supervised & Unsupervised Machine Learning , 2013 .

[12]  Jason Weston,et al.  Natural Language Processing (Almost) from Scratch , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Fabrizio Sebastiani,et al.  Machine learning in automated text categorization , 2001, CSUR.

[14]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[15]  N. B. Anuar,et al.  The rise of "big data" on cloud computing: Review and open research issues , 2015, Inf. Syst..

[16]  Fei-Fei Li,et al.  What, where and who? Classifying events by scene and object recognition , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[17]  William Z. Bernstein,et al.  A system and architecture for reusable abstractions of manufacturing processes , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[18]  Pietro Perona,et al.  A Bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[19]  Wolfgang Schulz,et al.  Self-optimizing Production Technologies , 2017 .

[20]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[21]  Tobias Meisen,et al.  Transfer-Learning: Bridging the Gap between Real and Simulation Data for Machine Learning in Injection Molding , 2018 .

[22]  António Gaspar-Cunha,et al.  Modeling and optimization of the injection-molding process: a review , 2018 .

[23]  Alex Pentland,et al.  A Bayesian Computer Vision System for Modeling Human Interactions , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[24]  Markus Bambach,et al.  On instabilities of force and grain size predictions in the simulation of multi-pass hot rolling processes , 2015 .

[25]  Heidi Ledford How to solve the world's biggest problems , 2015, Nature.

[26]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 3/E , 2014 .

[27]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[28]  Dilip Datta,et al.  Process parameter optimization of plastic injection molding: a review , 2015, International Journal of Plastics Technology.

[29]  S. Kamaruddin,et al.  Practical Applications of Taguchi Method for Optimization of Processing Parameters for Plastic Injection Moulding: A Retrospective Review , 2013 .

[30]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Learning Generative Visual Models from Few Training Examples: An Incremental Bayesian Approach Tested on 101 Object Categories , 2004, 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[31]  Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm,et al.  Emotions from Text: Machine Learning for Text-based Emotion Prediction , 2005, HLT.

[32]  Fanhuai Shi,et al.  Optimisation of Plastic Injection Moulding Process with Soft Computing , 2003 .

[33]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  Sustainable Materials - With Both Eyes Open , 2012 .

[34]  John Fulcher,et al.  Computational Intelligence: An Introduction , 2008, Computational Intelligence: A Compendium.

[35]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Learning to classify text using support vector machines - methods, theory and algorithms , 2002, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.

[36]  I. Pandelidis,et al.  Optimization of injection molding design. Part II: Molding conditions optimization , 1990 .

[37]  Walter Friesenbichler,et al.  Robust Process Control for Rubber Injection Moulding with Use of Systematic Simulations and Improved Material Data , 2015 .

[38]  László Monostori AI and machine learning techniques for managing complexity, changes and uncertainties in manufacturing , 2002 .

[39]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Wikis and collaborative learning in higher education , 2015 .

[41]  Ronay Ak,et al.  Analysis and optimization based on reusable knowledge base of process performance models , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[42]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[43]  László Monostori,et al.  ScienceDirect Variety Management in Manufacturing . Proceedings of the 47 th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems Cyber-physical production systems : Roots , expectations and R & D challenges , 2014 .

[44]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.