Functional impacts of exoskeleton-based rehabilitation in chronic stroke: multi-joint versus single-joint robotic training

Stroke is a major cause of disability in the world. The activities of upper limb segments are often compromised following a stroke, impairing most daily tasks. Robotic training is now considered amongst the rehabilitation methods applied to promote functional recovery. However, the implementation of robotic devices remains a major challenge for the bioengineering and clinical community. Latest exoskeletons with multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) may become particularly attractive, because of their low apparent inertia, the multiple actuators generating large torques, and the fact that patients can move the arm in the normal wide workspace. A recent study published in JNER by Milot and colleagues underlines that training with a 6-DOF exoskeleton impacts positively on motor function in patients being in stable phase of recovery after a stroke. Also, multi-joint robotic training was not found to be superior to single-joint robotic training. Although it is often considered that rehabilitation should start from simple movements to complex functional movements as the recovery evolves, this study challenges this widespread notion whose scientific basis has remained uncertain.

[1]  S. Micera,et al.  A Robotic System for Quantitative Assessment and Poststroke Training of Forelimb Retraction in Mice , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[2]  Foreman,et al.  The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. , 2013, JAMA.

[3]  S Claiborne Johnston,et al.  Global variation in stroke burden and mortality: estimates from monitoring, surveillance, and modelling , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[4]  J. Fung,et al.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  N. Schweighofer,et al.  Task-Oriented Rehabilitation Robotics , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[6]  Paul Cordo,et al.  Treatment of Severe Hand Impairment Following Stroke by Combining Assisted Movement, Muscle Vibration, and Biofeedback , 2013, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[7]  Jeroen N. Struijs,et al.  International Comparison of Stroke Cost Studies , 2004, Stroke.

[8]  B. Brewer,et al.  Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: A Review of Robotic Systems and Clinical Results , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[9]  Vicky Chan,et al.  A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  E. Burdet,et al.  Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. , 2010, Current opinion in neurology.

[11]  R. Riener,et al.  Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  L. Der-Yeghiaian,et al.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Joanna J McAdam,et al.  Does repetitive task training improve functional activity after stroke? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.