Effectiveness of early cycles of fast-acting treatment in generalised myasthenia gravis

Background Early fast-acting treatment (EFT) is the aggressive use of fast-acting therapies such as plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and/or intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone (IVMP) from the early phases of treatment. EFT is reportedly beneficial for early achievement of minimal manifestations (MM) or better status with ≤5 mg/day prednisolone (MM5mg), a practical therapeutic target for myasthenia gravis (MG). Objective The current study aimed to clarify which specific EFT regimen is efficacious and the patient characteristics that confer sensitivity to EFT. Methods We recruited a total of 1710 consecutive patients with MG who enrolled in the Japan MG Registry for this large-cohort study. Among them, 1066 with generalised MG who had received immunotherapy were analysed. Prognostic background factors were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching analysis between patients treated with EFT (n=350) and those treated without EFT (n=350). The clinical course and time to first achieve MM5mg after starting immunotherapy was analysed in relation to treatment combinations and patient characteristics. Results Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that EFT had a significant effect on the achievement of MM5mg (p<0.0001, log-rank test; HR 1.82, p<0.0001). Notably, EFT was efficacious for any type of MG, and the inclusion of IVMP resulted in earlier and more frequent achievement of MM5mg (p=0.0352, log-rank test; HR 1.46, p=0.0380). In addition, early administration of calcineurin inhibitors also promoted MM5mg achievement. Conclusion Early cycles of intervention with EFT and early use of calcineurin inhibitors provides long-term benefits in terms of achieving therapeutic targets for generalised MG, regardless of clinical subtype.

[1]  Shigeaki Suzuki,et al.  Japan MG registry: Chronological surveys over 10 years , 2022, Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology.

[2]  R. Govindarajan,et al.  Adverse Side Effects Associated with Corticosteroid Therapy: A Study in 39 Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis , 2021, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[3]  J. Statland,et al.  Safety, efficacy, and tolerability of efgartigimod in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis (ADAPT): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2021, The Lancet Neurology.

[4]  A. Uzawa,et al.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in generalized myasthenia gravis , 2021, Journal of Neurology.

[5]  F. Zimprich,et al.  Subgroup stratification and outcome in recently diagnosed generalized myasthenia gravis , 2020, Neurology.

[6]  A. Uzawa,et al.  Predictive score for oral corticosteroid-induced initial worsening of seropositive generalized myasthenia gravis , 2019, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[7]  M. Freimer Faculty Opinions recommendation of Rituximab as treatment for anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis: Multicenter blinded prospective review. , 2018, Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature.

[8]  Hidekazu Suzuki,et al.  Oral corticosteroid dosing regimen and long-term prognosis in generalised myasthenia gravis: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan , 2017, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[9]  G. L. Masson,et al.  Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. , 2017, The Lancet. Neurology.

[10]  M. Benatar,et al.  Rituximab as treatment for anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis , 2017, Neurology.

[11]  Hidekazu Suzuki,et al.  Early fast‐acting treatment strategy against generalized myasthenia gravis , 2017, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  M. Benatar,et al.  International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis , 2016, Neurology.

[13]  Nils Erik Gilhus,et al.  Myasthenia gravis: subgroup classification and therapeutic strategies , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  H. Murai Japanese clinical guidelines for myasthenia gravis: Putting into practice , 2015 .

[15]  C. Montomoli,et al.  Complete stable remission and autoantibody specificity in myasthenia gravis , 2013, Neurology.

[16]  P. Vermersch,et al.  Rituximab in refractory and non‐refractory myasthenia: A retrospective multicenter study , 2012, Muscle & nerve.

[17]  K. Fujihara,et al.  The MG‐QOL15 Japanese version: Validation and associations with clinical factors , 2012, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  K. Fujihara,et al.  [The MG-QOL15 Japanese version: validation and associations with clinical factors]. , 2012, Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology.

[19]  K. Fujihara,et al.  Factors associated with depressive state in patients with myasthenia gravis: a multicentre cross-sectional study , 2011, BMJ Open.

[20]  Shigeaki Suzuki,et al.  Early Aggressive Treatment Strategy against Myasthenia Gravis , 2010, European Neurology.

[21]  D. Sanders,et al.  Immunosuppressive therapies in myasthenia gravis , 2010, Autoimmunity.

[22]  D. Sanders,et al.  Autoimmune myasthenia gravis: emerging clinical and biological heterogeneity , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[23]  M. Pagala,et al.  Lifetime course of myasthenia gravis , 2008, Muscle & nerve.

[24]  D B Sanders,et al.  Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. , 2000, Neurology.

[25]  A. Lefvert,et al.  Treatment of myasthenia gravis with methylprednisolone pulse: a double blind study , 1998, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.