Fresh and hardened properties of 3D printable cementitious materials for building and construction

Abstract The main advantage of 3D concrete printing (3DCP) is that it can manufacture complex, non-standard geometries and details rapidly using a printer integrated with a pump, hosepipe and nozzle. Sufficient speed is required for efficient and fast construction. The selected printing speed is a function of the size and geometrical complexity of the element to be printed, linked to the pump speed and quality of the extruded concrete material. Since the printing process requires a continuous, high degree of control of the material during printing, high performance building materials are preferred. Also, as no supporting formwork is used for 3DCP, traditional concrete cannot be directly used. From the above discussion, it is postulated that in 3DCP, the fresh properties of the material, printing direction and printing time may have significant effect on the overall load bearing capacity of the printed objects. The layered concrete may create weak joints in the specimens and reduce the load bearing capacity under compressive, tensile and flexural action that requires stress transfer across or along these joints. In this research, the 3D printed specimens are collected in different orientations from large 3DCP objects and tested for mechanical properties. For the materials tested, it is found that the mechanical properties such as compressive and flexural strength of 3D printed specimen are governed by its printing directions.

[1]  Robert L. Peurifoy,et al.  Formwork For Concrete Structures , 1964 .

[2]  Phillip Frank Gower Banfill,et al.  THE RHEOLOGY OF FRESH CEMENT AND CONCRETE - A REVIEW , 2003 .

[3]  Ming Jen Tan,et al.  Properties of 3D Printable Concrete , 2016 .

[4]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  A thixotropy model for fresh fluid concretes: Theory, validation and applications , 2006 .

[5]  Richard A. Buswell,et al.  Development of a viable concrete printing process , 2011 .

[6]  Robert J. Flatt,et al.  Linking yield stress measurements: Spread test versus Viskomat , 2006 .

[7]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Additive manufacturing technologies : 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing , 2015 .

[8]  Kamal H. Khayat,et al.  Effect of W/CM and High-Range Water-Reducing Admixture on Formwork Pressure and Thixotropy of Self-Consolidating Concrete , 2006 .

[9]  Phillip Frank Gower Banfill,et al.  Rheology of fresh cement and concrete , 1991 .

[10]  Jian fei Chen,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Structures 3D-Printed With Cementitious Powders , 2015, 3D Concrete Printing Technology.

[11]  A. Gibb,et al.  Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete , 2012 .

[12]  Freek Bos,et al.  Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing , 2016, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction.

[13]  Don de Koker,et al.  Manufacturing processes for engineered cement-based composite material products , 2004 .

[14]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Processing and Properties of Construction Materials for 3D Printing , 2016 .

[15]  Behrokh Khoshnevis,et al.  Automated construction by contour craftingrelated robotics and information technologies , 2004 .

[16]  Mohsen Seifi,et al.  Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review of Mechanical Properties , 2016 .