TASSER‐based refinement of NMR structures

The TASSER structure prediction algorithm is employed to investigate whether NMR structures can be moved closer to their corresponding X‐ray counterparts by automatic refinement procedures. The benchmark protein dataset includes 61 nonhomologous proteins whose structures have been determined by both NMR and X‐ray experiments. Interestingly, by starting from NMR structures, the majority (79%) of TASSER refined models show a structural shift toward their X‐ray structures. On average, the TASSER refined models have a root‐mean‐square‐deviation (RMSD) from the X‐ray structure of 1.785 Å (1.556 Å) over the entire chain (aligned region), while the average RMSD between NMR and X‐ray structures (RMSDNMR_X‐ray) is 2.080 Å (1.731 Å). For all proteins having a RMSDNMR_X‐ray >2 Å, the TASSER refined structures show consistent improvement. However, for the 34 proteins with a RMSDNMR_X‐ray <2 Å, there are only 21 cases (60%) where the TASSER model is closer to the X‐ray structure than NMR, which may be due to the inherent resolution of TASSER. We also compare the TASSER models with 12 NMR models in the RECOORD database that have been recalculated recently by Nederveen et al. from original NMR restraints using the newest molecular dynamics tools. In 8 of 12 cases, TASSER models show a smaller RMSD to X‐ray structures; in 3 of 12 cases, where RMSDNMR_X‐ray <1 Å, RECOORD does better than TASSER. These results suggest that TASSER can be a useful tool to improve the quality of NMR structures. Proteins 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Yang Zhang,et al.  The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Skolnick,et al.  TOUCHSTONEX: Protein structure prediction with sparse NMR data , 2003, Proteins.

[3]  U Bastolla,et al.  How to guarantee optimal stability for most representative structures in the protein data bank , 2001, Proteins.

[4]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  DRESS: a database of REfined solution NMR structures , 2004, Proteins.

[5]  Alan E Mark,et al.  Relative stability of protein structures determined by X‐ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy: A molecular dynamics simulation study , 2003, Proteins.

[6]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  G Vriend,et al.  Validation of nuclear magnetic resonance structures of proteins and nucleic acids: Hydrogen geometry and nomenclature , 1999, Proteins.

[8]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  C. W. Hilbers,et al.  Improving the quality of protein structures derived by NMR spectroscopy** , 2002, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[10]  Yang Zhang,et al.  TASSER: An automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6 , 2005, Proteins.

[11]  P. Güntert Structure calculation of biological macromolecules from NMR data , 1998, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[12]  Miron Livny,et al.  RECOORD: A recalculated coordinate database of 500+ proteins from the PDB using restraints from the BioMagResBank , 2005, Proteins.

[13]  Ton Rullmann,et al.  Completeness of NOEs in protein structures: A statistical analysis of NMR data , 1999 .

[14]  J. Drenth Principles of protein x-ray crystallography , 1994 .

[15]  J. Rullmann,et al.  Quality assessment of NMR structures: a statistical survey. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  G. Clore,et al.  Sources of and solutions to problems in the refinement of protein NMR structures against torsion angle potentials of mean force. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[17]  A. R. Fresht Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding , 1999 .

[18]  Yang Zhang,et al.  SPICKER: A clustering approach to identify near‐native protein folds , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[19]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Application of sparse NMR restraints to large-scale protein structure prediction. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Gert Vriend,et al.  The precision of NMR structure ensembles revisited , 2003, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[21]  R Kaptein,et al.  Completeness of NOEs in protein structure: a statistical analysis of NMR. , 1999, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[22]  W. Chazin,et al.  Protein solution structure calculations in solution: Solvated molecular dynamics refinement of calbindin D9k , 1997, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[23]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Tertiary structure predictions on a comprehensive benchmark of medium to large size proteins. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[25]  A M Gronenborn,et al.  Improvements and extensions in the conformational database potential for the refinement of NMR and X-ray structures of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[26]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR_3 threading algorithm , 2004, Proteins.

[28]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality , 2004, Proteins.

[29]  M. Nilges,et al.  Influence of non-bonded parameters on the quality of NMR structures: A new force field for NMR structure calculation , 1999, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[30]  M. Y. Lobanov,et al.  Comparison of X‐ray and NMR structures: Is there a systematic difference in residue contacts between X‐ray‐ and NMR‐resolved protein structures? , 2005, Proteins.

[31]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Local energy landscape flattening: Parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding , 2002, Proteins.